Northland readers offer pretty good reasons for opposing marriage amendment
|
I’m all for hearing the other side of the marriage debate to get a better feel for why supporters are inclined to oppose marriage equality.
Twin Cities Daily Planet (https://www.tcdailyplanet.net/tag/lgbtqia/page/19/)
I’m all for hearing the other side of the marriage debate to get a better feel for why supporters are inclined to oppose marriage equality.
William Mitchell College of Law faculty voted on Wednesday to oppose a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage which will be on the ballot in November. In an email to faculty, staff and students, Eric Janus, Vice Dean of the school, the resolution was passed by a “substantial majority” of the faculty.“As you may have heard, this morning the Faculty of William Mitchell adopted a resolution opposing the proposed amendment to the Minnesota Constitution that would constitutionally define marriage as between one man and one woman (That definition is currently state law in Minnesota.)” wrote Janus. “While some Faculty members opposed the resolution, the resolution passed by a substantial majority of the Faculty.Janus was careful to explain that the resolution is not the college’s stance on the issue, just the faculty’s.“The faculty resolution expresses the sentiment that adoption of the constitutional amendment might hinder the school’s ability to maintain our culture with respect to LGBT employees and students,” wrote Janus. “Equally as important is our bedrock principle of academic freedom and freedom of expression. The Faculty’s vote does not establish or express an official position of the college on marriage, and every single one of our employees and students remains free to adopt and express her or his own views on the subject of marriage.”The resolution includes a statement acknowledging that some members of the William Mithcell community may disagree.“Many people of good faith support [the] Amendment [defining marriage as between one man and one woman], including some co-workers, students, and alumni, and they have every right to do so.”The resolution can be viewed here. Continue Reading
My buddy Bruce linked me yesterday to author Ann Bauer’s lengthy post about her disappointment (okay, shame and anger) upon returning from Washington State to live once again in Minnesota–only to find out the state that’s voting on a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage is not the Minnesota she used Continue Reading
When the Minnesota state legislature voted to place the marriage amendment on this fall’s ballot, “something clicked,” Twin Cities wedding photographer Pat Connolly said a couple weeks ago.
The 3:00 am vote last May took place on the same day Connolly was shooting his first same-sex wedding and felt more than a little ironic.
I’m pretty sure I was the only nut-job who fled Phoenix, Arizona, to Duluth, Minnesota, back in 1980. It was 115 degrees above the June day a guy at UMD name Jim Reinardy called to tell me I’d been awarded an assistantship to attend grad school.
St. Louis Park joined Minneapolis, St. Paul and Duluth on Monday when the city council voted in favor of a resolution against the anti-gay marriage amendment slated for the 2012 ballot.
My close personal friend Amber C. Continue Reading
Minnesota voters will confront the issue in simple black letters on a white ballot this November. Continue Reading
In the old Jewish joke, two guys are standing in the firing line, awaiting their fate.
“You have any last words?” the tsar’s soldier sneers.
“Death to the tsar!” one guy yells back. “May you all go to hell!”
“Sha!” says the other guy. “Don’t make trouble.”
* *
An anonymous guest post in opposition to the Minnesota Marriage Amendment from a reader at wantmarriageequality@gmail.com: