PRM moves for fees in DOJ lawsuit
|
Posted by Matt Ehling
Managed care versus fee-for-serivce … then and now
|
On October 1, 2012, the Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) issued an RFP seeking a vendor to Continue Reading
DOJ declares “no documents” – parties move to dismiss
|
In May of this year, PRM sued the U.S. Continue Reading
11,806 pages of files related to Marv Davidov, according to the FBI
|
On February 22nd, PRM filed a FOIA request with the Federal Bureau of Investigation related t Continue Reading
Arm domestic drones? Police aviation committee says “no”
|
The aviation committee of the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) recently issued recommended guidelines for the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) by law enforcement agencies. Continue Reading
Military Operations on Urban Terrain: What are they?
|
For the past several days, U.S. Continue Reading
New report critical of HMO public health care contracting
|
The Greater Minnesota Health Care Coalition (GMHCC) has just released a white paper on HMO health care contracting entitled “Who Was Minding the Store?” The group will present its findings to the public during a Capitol press conference on August 23rd. GMHCC is a consumer advocacy organization that focuses on health care and other policy issues.
License Plate Recognition (LPR) document collection
|
In Minnesota, an increasing amount of attention has been paid to the use of license plate recognition (LPR) technology by municipal police agencies. LPR units are car-mounted recording devices that scan the license plates of passing vehicles. When used in urban areas, they often record thousands of such encounters per day.
Drone lawsuit – pre-trial conference
|
The pre-trial conference for Public Record Media v. U.S. Department of Justice was held on August 14, 2012 at the federal courthouse in Minneapolis. Chief Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan presided. J.T. Haines appeared on behalf of Public Record Media. DOJ trial attorney Amy Powell appeared on behalf of the government. Both parties briefly discussed the state of the case. Continue Reading