The Star Tribune’s Thomas Lee reports that “Another Minnesota company leaves for Wisconsin.”
Dr. Joseph Ward, vice president of Marketing, said: “RJA Dispersions chose John Wold’s River Bluffs Business Center not only for its attractive location and economics, but also for the availability of industrial level power. Bill Rubin, director of the St Croix Economic Development Corporation coordinated key resources including availability of financial support from Char Gurney and the West Central Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission which is making our expansion plans possible in this difficult financing climate.”
Hey, I get why a manufacturer might covet “availability of industrial level power,” even though it’s a mystery to me why the company could find better power in Hudson, Wisconsin, than is available in 3M’s backyard. Just a hunch, but I think the “availability of financial support” probably played a bigger role.
|Growth & Justice is a progressive economic think tank committed to making Minnesota’s economy simultaneously more prosperous, fair, and environmentally sustainable.|
Hudson is also home of the long-vacant St. Croix Meadows dog track, which promised big crowds, fancy restaurants and an influx of high-rolling tourism when it opened in 1991. You’d think communities would learn, but maybe the weeds growing up in the cracks in the parking lot aren’t enough of a reminder.
This move is hardly on the same scale, but it brought to mind that only last week, Dell Inc. announced that it will shut down its state-of-the-art desktop computer manufacturing plant in Winston-Salem, N.C. facility by January, with the loss of 905 jobs.
Dell was promised more than $300 million in state and local incentives to open the [$130 million] plant. But it was required to invest $100 million, create 1,700 jobs by September 2010 and maintain those jobs for 10 more years. If those terms weren’t met, the company would forfeit the incentive package.
Dell owed the state another 800 jobs in less than a year. Folding the state-of-the-art tent seems almost honorable.
Dell says it “will absolutely continue to comply with and honor all agreements with various governmental entities,” which means it will pay back at least some of the help it received to locate there. As required.
[Winston-Salem Mayor Allen] Joines said he was assured by Kip Thompson, vice president for facilities, that Dell will honor its commitment to repay the $15.56 million the city has provided since Dell agreed to build the plant.
But millions of dollars won’t be returned. Public agencies paid to prepare the Dell site for construction, widen roads leading to the plant, and equip community colleges to train company workers before the plant opened.
“Here’s what it’ll take,” Dell vice president Kip Thompson told Commerce Secretary Jim Fain in May 2004, according to Fain’s notes. “1) free land; 2) free bldg.; 3) no taxes; 4) training at $5m; 5) participation in creation of future value in the community.” The
following month, Thompson said to Fain: “[I am] not wowed here-not sure the state’s stepping up here …If a state like N.C. can’t get after this, I’m worried for our country – there’s a certain amount of patriotism here.”
Meanwhile, Dell has announced that it would move its Irish operations to Poland in exchange for a 54 million Euro ($80 million) subsidy. The Poles are grateful, but say they are undeluded about the way the subsidy game works.
[W]ith wage costs rising, people here know they may have just a decade to make the most of the “Dell Effect” before the company vanishes again.
Although there’s no specific talk of tax concessions in the brief story about the Minnesota company leaving for Wisconsin, the “another” in the headline implies it is part of a trend, and it may be tempting for readers to assume that our supposed unfriendly business tax climate is to blame.
But Wisconsin’s total taxes as percent of income is now about 12.2 percent, ranking 13th, compared to 11.8 percent and a 19th ranking for Minnesota.
Let’s hope Wisconsin doesn’t decide to become Minnesota’s Poland. Then, who will be Wisconsin’s China?