FREE SPEECH ZONE | The obvious was there—and ignored here


Bill Knowles, a consultant and pitchman from Salt Lake City, visited the Twin Cities twice. Mr. Knowles’ visits were sponsored by the banks, insurance companies, government agencies and other vested interests (lobbyists, consultants, contractors etc.) (sometimes called “stakeholders”) comprising the Central Corridor Partnership.

The Free Speech Zone offers a space for contributions from readers, without editing by the TC Daily Planet. This is an open forum for articles that otherwise might not find a place for publication, including news articles, opinion columns, announcements and even a few press releases.

During his first visit, where he spoke at University United on University Avenue in St. Paul, after making his pitch for LRT, Mr. Knowles responded to questions. One questioner asked: “What were the factors that Salt Lake City (used) to determine to build (LRT) parallel to the freeway (along the rail corridor) rather than a corridor like University Avenue?” Knowles responded: “It’s where the existing railway was and it was the quickest and cheapest way to put it together…The obvious was there.”

Salt Lake City, the 35th largest market in the country, has multiple LRT lines. The Twin Cities, the 13th largest market, have one line? Apparently, in the Twin Cities, the obvious has been ignored.