Plans for Central Corridor LRT make some business owners uneasy

“As a business owner and a property owner, I’m against it.” Kathy Stransky expressed her hostility over the proposed Central Corridor LRT slated to stop outside her front door. Stransky and her husband Tom together own Midway Used and Rare Books in Saint Paul. The store has sat on the corner of Snelling and University for the past 43 years—and the Stranskys have owned it for 27 of those years.
Stransky said she and her husband have expressed their objections to light-rail coming through the neighborhood for the past 15 years. “It’s not that I’m opposed to it. If people want to get somewhere in a hurry it would make more sense to put it on the freeway. For the life of me, I don’t know why they picked University. It’s not taking the place of the bus.”
The logistics of the Central Corridor LRT is one of the main problems Stransky sees with the project. Stransky said that the city will remove all of the parking meters, which would have a major impact on their parking. In addition, the massive construction along University Avenue has her concerned. “Who’s going to pay property taxes when the streets are torn up?”
The proposed route for the Central Corridor LRT would begin in downtown Saint Paul at Union Station, travel along University Avenue until it meets up with Washington Avenue at the University of Minnesota campus, and from there it will continue to downtown Minneapolis connecting to the existing Hiawatha LRT line.
With a price tag nearing $1 billion, the project is currently substantially over budget. The Metropolitan Council is evaluating multiple plans; however, only one plan meets the cost effectiveness index (CEI), which is required to receive matching federal funds. At a total cost of $909.1 million, this plan would have the trains run at street level at the U of M rather than through a tunnel, thus eliminating one of the most costly parts of the plan. In addition, the plan maintains the original University Avenue train stops proposed (Dale, Lexington and Snelling), while allow construction of the underground infrastructure needed for three additional stops (Western, Victoria and Hamline), which could be built at a future time.
With a self-imposed deadline of February 27 looming, the Met Council recently concluded a series of listening sessions designed to elicit public response regarding the project. At these sessions, Peter Bell and other members of the Council sat quietly as, one by one, residents expressed their concerns. Many tried to convince the Council why the needs of the community should outweigh costs.
Stransky chose not to attend the listening sessions mainly because she felt their words would have fallen on deaf ears. Over the years, Stransky has attended countless meeting trying to get Met Council and others connected to the project to listen. She has found the entire ordeal frustrating. She likens this to an incident occurring a few years ago involving the city’s determination to build a new bus shelter on her corner. She and her husband objected, pointing out that the sidewalk was too narrow and that there was a six-person shelter one block away. Against their objections, the city persisted and built a 2 ½-person shelter which now obstructs pedestrian traffic.
She believes that once again the parties in charge will not listen to the wishes of the people. “I believe there are a handful of people pushing this through. I don’t believe it’s about public transit. I think it’s about being new.”
From where Stransky sits, she doesn’t see that many benefits for her or any other independent business in the area. “Who will it be good for except big business? I don’t know of one independent business that is for it. They’re so eager to help non-independents, but not help independents.”
Mike Hatzistamoulos, owner of The Best Steak House at Victoria and University, echoed many of Stransky’s concerns. He, too, is a long-time business owner in the Midway-Frogtown area. Born in Greece, Hatzistamoulos emigrated here as a child with his family 35 years ago. He opened the restaurant and has remained on the same corner for the past 20 years. He commented that perhaps if the light-rail stops at Victoria it might be beneficial for his business; however, he believes the construction will be problematic for his current customers. “How will they get here?”
Over the 27 years the Stranskys have owned the bookstore, they have seen the neighborhood go through many changes. “I’ve watched the neighborhood get worse,” Stransky said. “This neighborhood is getting very, very poor. There are good businesses struggling now…Ragstock moved.”
She anticipates many small business owners will experience a significant drop in business during the construction phase. That, coupled with being obligated to pay taxes, will lead to many small businesses closing their doors permanently, thus making University look even more blighted. “I don’t think it’s good for the city,” Stransky commented.
Stransky fears the light-rail may ultimately lead to the end of her own business. “If we can’t stay here, I don’t think I have it in me to start again.”


Subscribe






Comments
oh, the Stranskys
The Stranskys are a reasonably isolated voice, and they’ve been hollering since the first Light Rail went up. Businesses along the Hiawatha line have boomed as a direct result of the line, and it’s not like they’re being asked to move out.
Quote: “Businesses along
Quote: “Businesses along the Hiawatha line have boomed as a direct result of the line”
This would be about the funniest statement I have heard in years if it weren’t so tragic. I drive Hiawatha from Fort Snelling to I-94 at least three times a week. I certainly have not seen any businesses “booming”, or even that appear to benefit from the line. Hiawatha devistated the neighborhoods and there are few businesses left within walking distance that could/would benefit from this white elephant.
The Central Corridor
The Central Corridor project makes no sense. This is a classic solution looking for a problem. The project will consume a billion dollars in construction cost plus millions of dollars per year in operating subsidies at a time when we cannot adequately fund education, health care, and public safety. If this is really about conservation install a system of trolley lines, i.e. buses powered by overhead wires like many other cities use. It’s cheaper to build, cheaper to maintain, cheaper to operate, and more flexible to change. But this makes sense so the Met Council will continue on the mad rush to spend scarce public funds. It’s too bad Carl Polad was able to sell Twin City Lines to the Council and set the stage for the endless expenditures.
If you’ve ever been
If you’ve ever been inside Stranskys’ store and their heard conservative talk radio blasting or seen their hostility toward the people who unfortunately must wait at the bus stop outside their store; then you already know the Stranskys don’t care for this neighborhood at all. Good riddance to them, and welcome to the Central Corridor!
LRT benefits to small businesses are evident elsewhere
The Stranskys and other small business owners opposed to high quality rail transit are unaware (apparently) of the positive experiences with LRT elsewhere and are being duped into opposing LRT by folks without the interest of the neighborhoods and small businesses at heart. I invite them to investigate LRT’s impact on communities elsewhere before they embrace a car-only University Avenue which is the biggest Un-welcome mat they could put out for potential customers to their establishments.
Minneapolitan filmmaker John Akre, visited Portland to
talk to small business owners along the Interstate Avenue corridor (which is strikingly similar to the University Avenue corridor) to get their opinions on how the LRT line has impacted their businesses. As one would expect, the business owners were worried about negative impacts before construction, but their fears were not realized. The Interstate Avenue Yellow Line design in Portland is a one general traffic lane in each direction configuration along with bicycle lanes and turn lanes at intersections. Here’s the On Transit
episode where business owners share their overwhelmingly positive experience in Portland with LRT:
http://sloppyfilms.blogspot.com/2006/08/on-transit-30-segment-1.html
I hope the residents who
I hope the residents who live on Thomas , Minnehaha, Marshall, and Selby Avenues, are ready to shoulder the traffic that currently flows on University Avenue during and after construction of this fiasco. Traffic will follow the path of least resistance and when encountering obstacles and restrictions to the traffic flow, as this pork project will do, traffic will shift to adjoining streets.
Traffic is the last thing we should be worrying about serving
This “pork project” will give people the option to leave their expensive, wasteful, ball and chain of an automobile at home. This “pork project” will reduce single occupancy motor vehicle trips overall and certainly will not result in more auto traffic on the neighborhood streets cited by Mr. Anonymous commenter who is afraid to stand by his or her meaningless words.
Anonymous fear mongering by anonymous people who know nothing about land use and transportation are becoming quite tiring. Please find something else to rag about.
Not An Isolated Voice
I have seen Kathy Stransky speak at a light rail meeting. She suggested putting the rail underground at Snelling and University so that one of the busiest intersections in the city would not be disrupted, and so that rail riders would not have to wait on the lights. Running on I-94 makes sense, too. So, now I have heard two reasonable plans from her and zero reasonable plans from the LRT powers that be. The current light rail plan is insanely poor design if one’s goal is to actually get from point A to point B in a reasonable amount of time.
p.s.— “listening sessions” are actually “we will pretend to take your issues into account” sessions. Kathy is right about that, too.
Post new comment