Domestic abusers, stalkers could be prohibited from having a firearm

Someone who commits domestic violence or stalks another person could lose access to a firearm.

On a 111-15 vote Wednesday, the House approved HF3238 as amended. It would prohibit a person subject to an order for protection in a child or domestic abuse case from possessing weapons for the length of the order under certain circumstances, and require them to surrender their firearms as would someone convicted of a domestic assault or stalking offense if being prohibited from possessing firearms is part of their punishment.

“I know this bill will not save every life, but this is an action that I believe will save lives,” said Rep. Dan Schoen (DFL-St. Paul Park), the bill sponsor.

He emphasized the bill does not allow the government to take guns without due process or a court conviction nor does it allow illegal searches and seizures. “This bill does not target the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens,” Schoen said.

The bill now goes to the Senate, where Sen. Ron Latz (DFL-St. Louis Park) is the sponsor.

An abusing party would need to transfer possession of their firearms to a law enforcement agency, a federally licensed firearms dealer or a third party. A person who accepts a transferred firearm from an abusing party or offender would be guilty of a gross misdemeanor if the offender obtains possession of the transferred firearm while prohibited from possessing firearms.

St. Paul City Attorney Sara Grewing told the House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee March 25 that her office handles approximately 1,000 misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor domestic abuse cases annually, while the Ramsey County Attorney’s Office handles more than 800 felony and juvenile cases each year.

“It is our experience that guns make domestic abuse more terrifying,” she said. “Firearms are an instrument of torture in relationships involving domestic abuse.”

Rep. Tony Cornish (R-Vernon Center), an avid gun rights supporter, voted for the bill “without hesitation.”

“We put as much protection for gun owners as we possibly could, and also protect a woman or a man from getting shot and killed.”

Left: Rep. Dan Schoen explains provisions of his bill, HF3238, which would prohibit a person subject to an order for protection in a child or domestic abuse case from possessing weapons for the length of the order under certain circumstances. (Photo by Paul Battaglia)

    Our primary commenting system uses Facebook logins. If you wish to comment without having a Facebook account, please create an account on this site and log in first. If you are already a registered user, just scroll up to the log in box in the right hand column and log in.

    Mike Cook's picture
    Mike Cook

    Mike Cook writes for Session Daily, a publication of the Minnesota House of Representatives.

    Comments

    Comment viewing options

    Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

    Absurd

    Until the gun shows are outlawed, there's no way whatever to keep felons and abusers from guns.  For some reason, maybe the financial clout of NRA, politicians shy away from doing anything effective.  So it becomes political theater, and articles like this will run again and again with no further forward progress.