COMMUNITY VOICES | Mining doublespeak at the Minnesota legislature

Kennecott's Bingham Canyon Mine landslide, Utah, April 2013

Sustainable Mining is an Oxymoron - Legislation has been introduced to create a so-called "Sustainable Mining Institute" ( HF 2842/ SF 2632 ).   Money would be appropriated from the state general fund ($3 million for 2015, and may accept funds from outside sources). 

 Mineral resources are finite, therefore mining is inherently not sustainable. In addition, the mining process depletes clean, sustaining sources of water, and requires enormous amounts of energy. 

This legislation is unnecessary and is a subsidy to the mining industry to promote more mining.  The Natural Resource Research Institute (NRRI) and the Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation Board (IRRRB) are already involved in research on mining, along with the Department of Natural Resources Lands and Minerals Division.

Any new research money should instead be devoted to a sustainable use of our metals.  Our state could create a Sustainable Usage of Metals Research Institute.  Such research could find ways to recycle metals, repair products made from metals,  engineer more efficient design of products,  increase product durability, increase the longevity of metals already in use, re-source metals from abandoned settings, substitute non-metal materials where possible, and promote boycotting of electronic items that are designed for obsolescence.

When our metals run out, they are gone, not to be replaced.  Northeastern Minnesota needs to take a new direction, away from dependency upon a destructive and unhealthy mining economy that is inherently unsustainable.  

Email your legislators in opposition to this bill ( HF 2842/ SF 2632 )   Tell them to stop promoting mining and instead support the clean water and intact ecosystems that truly sustain all of us.

 

 

POINT(114.177987 22.321702)
  • The only reason copper does not get recycled from where it is buried and disconnected within a few feet of the surface, not thousands of feet deep, and not bonded with toxic sulfide rock, is because the multinationals like Glencore can't buy it from our DNR for bargain basement rates. - by Marco Good on Mon, 03/31/2014 - 8:11pm
  • Thank you for this alert. I will notafiy my legislators. - by Jeff Strate on Mon, 03/31/2014 - 9:53am
  • Call it what it is: a pro-sulfide-mining bill using obfuscation to perpetuate a myth. - by Mimi Jennings on Tue, 04/01/2014 - 10:46pm

Our primary commenting system uses Facebook logins. If you wish to comment without having a Facebook account, please create an account on this site and log in first. If you are already a registered user, just scroll up to the log in box in the right hand column and log in.

EP's picture
Elanne Palcich