Will the real Minneapolis Spring Break Academy please stand up?

Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) are targeting a number of interventions this spring, but the descriptions are confusing and sometimes contradictory. This is clearest in two descriptions of the Spring Break Academy, which offer different descriptions of which students will be invited — or allowed — to attend school and receive special help during spring break.

As reported in an earlier article, the district initially said "The focus will start on students scoring in the yellow and then move into students scoring in the red" and "only students in grades 3-8" would be eligible.

Read the other articles in this series:

Then in a second memo, the district said the program was for K-8 "students who in the past may have been disproportionally suspended or expelled."

So what's really going on? I emailed an MPS communications/public relations person:

"I have published two stories that connect to the short-term strategies and Spring Break Academy proposal. I will still work with the district's POV, if anyone would like to get back to me.

"Also, I have a memo that details a different, or alternative, focus for the Spring Break Academy. This one includes frequently suspended students as a target audience for the Spring Break Academy, and notes that the 2 hour Community Ed block should include positive "Behavior Ed."

"Can someone at MPS explain this change? Why was it implemented? Is this 'behavior ed' angle to replace the 2 hour original block of community ed work for students?"

She replied:

"I hope it’s clear that the Spring Break Academy is an effort to provide more quality time to students to help them catch up—one, because students have missed 6-8 days of school this year and two, because we believe that more quality time is critical for many of our students. This is a momumental shift in the way MPS is looking at time—to use breaks and Saturday time in a whole different way that has the potential to expand in future years. Unlike most other districts, MPS took quick action and made an important investment for students.

"We are well aware that students who miss time because of time spent out of class—for suspension or otherwise—often are behind their peers academically. There are many students who qualify for the academy—just because we are offering the academy to students who have missed time because of suspensions, doesn’t mean that it’s a 'different focus.' It only makes sense to include those students in the Spring Break Academy.

"The community education component of the program will continue and each site will provide positive behavior strategies based on the site’s needs. These positive behavior strategies will continue through the remainder of the year and improve the quality of the programs. An example of a positive behavior program is team building and working together."

So — who's eligible for Spring Break Academy —the "yellow zone" students in grades 3-8, who might test as proficient on the Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments, if only they get four half-days of intensive test-taking preparation? Or the K-8 "students who in the past may have been disproportionally suspended or expelled?"

POINT(114.177987 22.321702)

    Our primary commenting system uses Facebook logins. If you wish to comment without having a Facebook account, please create an account on this site and log in first. If you are already a registered user, just scroll up to the log in box in the right hand column and log in.

    Mary Turck's picture
    Mary Turck

    Mary Turck (maryturck [at] gmail [dot] com) is a freelance writer, editor, teacher, and lifelong activist, and former editor of the TC Daily Planet.

    sarahlahm's picture
    Sarah Lahm

    Sarah Lahm (sarah dot lahm at gmail dot com) is a writer, blogger, and former English Instructor, and has children in the Minneapolis Public Schools.