OPINION | Sidestepping race in Zimmerman’s trial only puts a bandaid on America’s racial wound

Over the past several days, I have been watching the trial of George Zimmerman in horror, anger, and disgust. My heart has been heavy.

I watched at the attempts to discredit Trayvon’s parents - Sybrina Fulton and Tracy Martin. I watched as they cried throughout the trial, my heart aching as Trayvon’s mother looked away when her son’s dead body was shown on the screen. I could see the immense pain in her eyes.

And then there was Trayvon’s friend, Rachel Jeantel. I watched how Zimmerman’s defense attorney grilled Jeantel with unnecessary details. I noticed the mocking tone, and the condescending requests for her to repeat her words “loudly and clearly.” The disrespectful attempts to paint her as dishonest, ignorant, and uneducated were obvious.

And then I watched the closing arguments -- how the prosecution provided point after point demonstrating where truth and justice in this case lie; while the defense attorney relentlessly tried to tear apart a kid’s character, painting him a criminal, aggressor, and thug.

What is striking to me about the Zimmerman trial and overall media commentary is the intentional erasure of race, as if Trayvon was murdered in a vacuum. It’s as if race and racism in this country do not exist, as if race had nothing to do with Trayvon’s death, when in reality, race is at the heart of it all.

For those of us who understand how race relations in this country work, race is the elephant in the room. To us, it is clear what happened: Trayvon, a young, black male, was walking down a street in white, upper-middle class suburbia. He was consequently racially profiled, followed, and then killed - by a man who made assumptions about his identity and values merely by looking at him.

We all know Zimmerman did not have to act; he was told not to by authorities. He didn’t have to follow, shoot, or kill. But he did, because what he made himself believe was that Trayvon was a criminal. Just another “f***ing punk, one of “those assholes” who always gets away.

This trial and Trayvon’s death hurt. It hurts because this is not new. It’s part of a long history of violence against black and brown bodies, a history of violence that is intimately connected to our own present-day lives.

On a daily basis, people of color are profiled and policed. From the way we are perceived when walking down the street, in the airport, and malls; to the way colleagues and peers make assumptions about our competence in schools and workplaces; to the subtle microaggressions we deal with from passersby; to the disproportionate state violence and brutality of our communities by police and authorities.

Racial profiling is our daily lived reality.

That’s why it is a slap in the face for people to say race had nothing to do with the way Zimmerman profiled Trayvon. This statement in itself completely denies us our truths and our lived realities. It essentially says, “We don’t believe you. We don’t see race, racism, or racial profiling, so it can’t be there. Stop making this up.” To that I say: “We know it when we see it. Just because you don’t see it does not mean it is not there. It means you are privileged enough to not have experienced it or understand it.”

And that is the gut-wrenching irony in all of this: that the victims of racial profiling, racial violence, harassment, and microaggressions are told to keep quiet. We are told race doesn’t matter. That racial bias did not play a role in Zimmerman’s decisions. And, in fact, the judge herself ruled the term “racial profiling” would not be allowed during the trial.

Well, this begs the question: How can you even begin to fairly administer justice if you have already sanitized the crime? How can you get to the bottom of it, if you have already eliminated the very real possibility of racial bias? It seems to me that justice for Trayvon was - from the beginning - set up to be a futile effort.

The double irony in this is, it was, in fact Zimmerman who first made this a race issue. Had Trayvon been a white, blond-haired teenager, I doubt Zimmerman would have acted in the way he did. But, Trayvon wasn’t privileged enough to be white. He was black. He was wearing a hoodie. And that was enough for Zimmerman to assume he was a threat.

Sadly, something in my gut tells me justice will not be served. That, even in the best case scenario, Zimmerman will not face the full charge. For those of us who are on the side of justice, obviously this is not enough. All we can do is anxiously wait for the verdict.

However, what is clear to those who understand America’s race problem is that the Zimmerman trial merely spotlights how black life in America is worthless and disposable. The refusal to acknowledge racial bias and stereotyping as a cause for Trayvon’s death represents a myth: the myth of “post-racial” and “colorblind” America.

This America simultaneously devalues black life, while e-racing racism and tangible manifestations thereof. This America attempts to “move forward” from the race conversation, while completely sidestepping it. This America tries to apply a band-aid to the wound, without stopping the bleeding first.

I submit that our country’s race problem will never go away until we first heal the wound. Until then, it will keep coming back to haunt us.

Related stories:

Talking about Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman (Mary Turck, 2013)

BEHIND THE STORY | Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman: When will the cycle of racism stop? (Sheila Regan, 2013)

COMMUNITY VOICES | In the aftermath of Zimmerman’s acquittal, racial justice remains elusive (Nekima Levy-Pounds)

  • "America is not the land of the free for all Her sons" - by Michelle Vilakati on Sat, 07/13/2013 - 10:36pm
  • Is it likely for a man to be crying for help when someone is sitting on him on the ground and punching repeatedly? Might he be too busy dealing with all this to have an opportunity to cry for help -- in the steady way that we hear it on the 911 call? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtObAo3LBoI Also, the 911 recording only captures the tail end of the fight. What we hear are not screams of a man getting punched, pummeled or pounded. Rather, we hear the desperate pleas for help by someone in grave danger, a danger that he knows and appreciates. Indeed, the cries are of such desperation that they pierce the coldest of hearts. Yet, Zimmerman says it was he who was screaming for help. And he also says that just then Martin was prying his gun away. But if Martin had grabbed the gun how come we have none of his DNA on it? There should have been something, even if Martin had only touched the gun, let alone grabbed it, or struggled for it. Indeed, we might expect a struggle for control to leave a heavier DNA imprint on the gun. Yet, it left none. What about the silence, that dead silence we hear after the gunshot? Does it tell us anything? If Zimmerman was the one crying for help that eerie silence after the shot is odd. Moreover, just before then we would expect his cries for help to be interrupted by the fight, by the struggle for the gun. They were not. Rather, they continue on steady, though more desperate, by in the same tempo as they had started. This is not possible from someone having his head pounded on the pavement; not possible from someone struggling for control of a gun. No, those steady heart wrenching howls were coming from someone being held at gun point; someone that is feeling the hard cold steel of a gun in his side; someone young and untested with the dangers of life, someone who suddenly realized that he is over his head and that life is about to come to an end. Our experience tells us that this is how things went that February night in Florida. The person who fired the gunshot heard another human being's repeated and desperate pleas for help, but ignored them. A murder conviction is thus in order. It is supported by all the available physical evidence -- the only reliable thing we have to go on in this case -- and by ordinary common sense. - by George Kafantaris on Sat, 07/13/2013 - 3:23am
  • well said - by Bill LIndeke on Sun, 07/14/2013 - 8:49pm

Our primary commenting system uses Facebook logins. If you wish to comment without having a Facebook account, please create an account on this site and log in first. If you are already a registered user, just scroll up to the log in box in the right hand column and log in.

Lolla Mohammed Nur's picture
Lolla Mohammed Nur

Lolla Mohammed Nur was Community Engagement Editor of TC Daily Planet, 2013-14.