OPINION | Education reform industry targets Twin Cities

Rupert Murdoch, the media mogul owner of Fox News and dozens of other companies around the world, recently announced he was moving into the “education” business. He said, "When it comes to K through 12 education, we see a $500 billion sector in the US alone.”

Murdoch is part of a growing list of corporate executives who see schools as profit centers. The education reform industry and their privatization efforts that have virtually destroyed the public education systems in Chicago, Philadelphia and New Orleans have been quietly, and not so quietly, targeting the Twin Cities.

Since 1995, budget cuts and poor policy decisions have closed at least two dozen public elementary schools in Minneapolis, according to Eric Myott, research fellow at the University of Minnesota’s Institute on Metropolitan Opportunity (IMO). The impact has been larger class sizes and fewer neighborhood schools.

At the same time, the number of taxpayer funded charter school slots in Minneapolis has skyrocketed by over 600 percent from 1,529 in 2000 to 10,895 in 2010. In St. Paul, the increase in public funded charter seats has grown from 3,721 to 8,339, a 124 percent increase, according to school enrolment data compiled by IMO.

As our public schools deal with insufficient resources and increasing challenges, they need more support, not less.

But a group of unelected, corporate oriented, “education reform leaders” have announced that they are pushing to develop 20 more charter schools in Minneapolis. Last year, Charter School Partners, a pro-charter school lobbying and advocacy group rolled out their “Charters 2.0” initiative, in which they will use public funds to finance “the creation and growth” of charter schools and fast-track the approval process for new charter schools.

As part of their coordinated “Education Reform” effort, organizations from around the country are pouring money into an aggressive lobbying and public relations efforts to promote the expansion of charters.

According to recent lobbying reports, StudentsFirst, Inc., the controversial Sacramento-based education reform group headed by Michele Rhee, spent $99,122 over the past two years on media advertising to “influence legislative action” and other lobbying efforts. Meanwhile, the New York City-based 50CAN, Inc. spent $144,396 to lobby here. The chair of 50-CAN, Minnesota’s own Matthew Kramer, is also the CEO of Teach for America, a group that has also been spending money in Minnesota to impact legislation and campaigns.

What the national and state charter school proponents fail to reveal is that their “solution” to the challenges facing public education in America is failing.

For example, charter schools in the Twin Cities are even more racially isolated than our public schools. As of 2011, fewer than one in five Twin Cities’ charter schools qualified as “integrated.” As our cities grapple with the negative effects of segregation, charter schools in Minneapolis are making the problem significantly worse.

Just as troubling is the fact that studies continue to prove that charter schools are not “high achieving.” A major study conducted by the University of Minnesota School of Law’s non-profit; non-partisan Institute on Race & Poverty determined that “traditional schools outperformed charter schools after controlling for student poverty, race, special education needs, limited language abilities, student mobility rates and school size.”

The greatest threat of all is that charter schools are undermining the fundamental American principle that public schools should be governed by the communities they were built to serve. But one need only look at the Board of Directors of these various charter schools to see where education reform is taking us. Hiawatha Academies, for example, has a board of executives from major corporate entities such as United Health, Best Buy, Standard Health, and U.S. Bank. Similar evidence can be found with dozens of other charters. In some cases, the charter chain headquarters are not even located in Minnesota.

It is time for our elected leaders to put a stop to this attack on public education and re-dedicate themselves to rebuilding and renewing the public schools of Minneapolis and St. Paul.

Valerie Rittler is a Minneapolis Public High School teacher and parent of three children in Minneapolis Public Schools.

  • While the term “education reform” might have had a more benign meaning in the past, it has become the cover for a growing malignancy perpetrated by those who want to feed off the public trough at the expense of the state's neediest students and communities. It’s no secret what our school systems need: local control and greater, community-wide support. If we could only give our students and teachers adequate resources, including smaller class sizes and some relief from all the ancillary work that saps educators’ time and energy from actually teaching, we wouldn’t be in a situation where fast-talking education “reformers” could get any traction. Public education is NOT a business. It’s part of the social contract. By turning it into a money-making opportunity for business interests whose only allegiance is to their stakeholders (and by allowing those interests to demonize educators in order to weaken resistance to the takeover), we’re doing a tremendous disservice to our students, our communities and our nation. To see what’s really going on here, just follow the money. And by the way, whenever someone feeds you a line about teachers and teachers unions being the “problem,” be very, very suspicious of their intentions. - by Tim Alevizos on Mon, 04/01/2013 - 11:14am
  • If anyone believes Rupert Murdoch, the Waltons, Eli Broad, Bill gates, or Michelle Rhee care more about Minneapolis kids than the teachers who have them in their classrooms every day, I have a bridge to sell them. - by Robert Valiant on Mon, 04/01/2013 - 5:50pm
  • When MinnCan and educatin philanthropists first came on the scene I was heartened to think things might actually be different than the RheeFrm that had so devastated places like Washington D.C., New Orleans, and Philadelphia. MinnCan's first stated priority was early childhood education. Something that actually had proven impact on improving education for the most at risk. It seemed like about a month before MinnCan and other local money pivoted away from reforms that work to reforms that have no correlation to educational achievement. The bulk of the efforts went towards union busting and human resources reforms, and going after teachers. With zero correlation between their largest efforts and achievement, it has to be obvious to any thinking person where these reforms agenda lies. - by Alec Timmerman on Mon, 04/01/2013 - 6:58pm
  • As a native of MN, I'm saddened to see the destruction of our state's public schools for the sake of profit. This is happening everywhere in this nation and there is no doubt that those who are looking to make a profit off of our kids will do just that. They won't improve learning, but will make a profit for a certain few. Great article, Valerie Olsen Rittler. - by Stefanie Rysdahl Fuhr on Mon, 04/01/2013 - 7:05pm
  • I saw somewhere that Education Minnesota spent $1.4M in lobbying over the last two years. So, not exaggerating, over the last 2 years they spent 1000% more than MinnCAN did? Just trying to get my facts right. - by Daniel Sellers on Thu, 03/28/2013 - 9:00pm
  • Corporate private Charter Schools preparing America's students for Corporate private prisons. And all the tax payers dollar. Prisons have a higher payout than schools! - by Mary MacKinnon on Mon, 04/01/2013 - 5:39pm
  • Great video to watch. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2LJzEuodZw&feature=youtu.be - by Stefanie Rysdahl Fuhr on Mon, 04/01/2013 - 7:06pm
  • Thanks Valerie for the shout out. Charter School Partners is proud to partner with Supt. Bernadeia Johnson and MPS to help implement MPS' strategic plan of creating great schools for all kids. - by Brian Murphy Sweeney on Thu, 03/28/2013 - 8:08pm
  • I have to admit, I actually thought this was satire. But upon review, this can only be a propaganda piece to get more parents to choose charter schools for their children. My compliments to the charter school recruiter who came up with this. - by Pat Garofalo on Thu, 03/28/2013 - 8:56pm

Our primary commenting system uses Facebook logins. If you wish to comment without having a Facebook account, please create an account on this site and log in first. If you are already a registered user, just scroll up to the log in box in the right hand column and log in.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

It started with such promise....

When MinnCan and educatin philanthropists first came on the scene I was heartened to think things might actually be different than the RheeFrm that had so devastated places like Washington D.C., New Orleans, and Philadelphia. MinnCan's first stated priority was early childhood education. Something that actually had proven impact on improving education for the most at risk. 

It seemed like about a month before MinnCan and other local money pivoted away from reforms that work to reforms that have no correlation to educational achievement. The bulk of the efforts went towards union busting and human resources reforms, and going after teachers.  With zero correlation between their largest efforts and achievement, it has to be obvious to any thinking person where these reforms agenda lies.