Connecting over the proposed voter ID amendment

Photos By: 
Bruce Johansen

The League of Women Voters does not take voting lightly. In fact, the nonpartisan political organization was founded in 1920 during the convention of the National American Woman Suffrage Association, just six months before ratification of the 19th amendment, which granted women the right to vote. Ratification came after 70-plus years of struggle.

Gwen Myers, a former history and government teacher who serves as a board member and volunteer lobbyist for the state organization, spoke on behalf of the League of Women Voters Minneapolis to a group gathered at Cause Spirits & Soundbar for a Get Connected! event on August 22nd.

Myers, who has been an election judge for the past ten years, warned that the voter ID amendment being put to Minnesota voters this November is “definitely a threat to people’s voting.” She said that the process of acquiring an acceptable form of photo ID with a current permanent address is a burdensome and costly process for many state residents.

Amendment would create unnecessary hurdles 

The League of Women Voters has come out strongly against photo ID requirements for voters, saying they create hurdles for otherwise eligible voters, are unnecessary for election integrity because no one in Minnesota has ever been convicted of voter impersonation, and would add significant costs to the whole election process.

Gwen Myers League of Women Voters

Gwen Myers 

Among other consequences, Myers observed that the proposed requirements would effectively end election day registration as we know it, something that half-a-million Minnesotans typically take advantage of in presidential elections. Furthermore, those voters would be required to vote provisionally, making it uncertain whether their votes would be counted. Absentee voting as we know it would likely come to an end, too, as would the use of passports, military IDs and student IDs as proof of identity. No more vouching for relatives, friends, or neighbors either.

With no history of fraud, a voter suppression effort

For numerous reasons, the photo identification requirements would impact specific groups most harshly, including young people, students, low-income residents, the elderly, people of color, shelter residents, and others living in institutions or facilities where they have no fixed address.

According to Myers, approximately 25 percent of African Americans do not have a current, government-issued ID; nor do18 percent (which translates to 123,000) of voters over the age of 65. At the other end of the age spectrum, 18 percent of citizens ages 18 to 24 do not have a government-issued ID with their current address and name on it. Some 15 percent of voters earning less than $35,000 a year do not have a photo ID either.

Our Vote Our Future estimates that some 700,000 Minnesotans could be impacted if the amendment is approved. Minnesota would likely lose its status as the state with the highest voter turnout in the nation. If approved, the amendment will go into effect in 2015. 

Given that there have been no voter impersonation convictions in Minnesota--the one type of voting fraud a photo ID would prevent--and virtually no cases (one one-hundredth of one-percent of votes cast) of voter fraud of any kind, Myers pointed out that this is a solution in search of a problem. It’s “the big lie,” she said.

“When you sign the roster you’re swearing to a number of things,” said Myers. “You’re told that it’s a felony to lie about your identity, a felony punishable by imprisonment and steep fines” of up to $10,000 and a year in jail.

Fraud, she said, is what lawyers for former Sen. Norm Coleman and his successor, Sen. Al Franken, were looking for in the contested 2008 election. Myers noted that Fritz Knaak, Coleman’s attorney, has said that no fraud was found.

If there’s no evidence of voter fraud, then what is the amendment’s real purpose? “This is a voter suppression effort,” said Myers. “Most of the groups affected are those who would likely vote Democratic.” 

Former Gov. Arne Carlson, a Republican, and former Vice President Walter Mondale, a Democrat, have said that the proposed amendment is, "a product of an organization known as ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council), which is the creation of the Koch brothers, who amassed their fortunes in oil and who live in Florida. The goal of ALEC is to influence legislators across the nation." In its Proposing Constitutional Amendments: A Handbook for State Lawmakers, ALEC promotes the practice of amending state constitutions. It is currently pursuing voter ID amendments in numerous states as a way of giving Repubicans an electoral advantage.

Unfortunately, Myers told the crowd at Cause, amendment opponents aren’t well organized, so opposition “hasn’t been as robust as it should be.”

Organizing through social media

One way to become more organized, responded Marcos Lopez-Carlson of the Twin Cities Media Alliance, is through social media. With nearly a billion users worldwide, the equivalent of the third largest nation on earth, “Facebook is worth paying attention to for that reason alone.” Besides being a place to post cute cat pictures and videos, Lopez-Carlson said, it is one of the places where people are having important conversations, discussions and dialogue.

Marcos Lopez-Carlson at Cause League of Women Voters

Marcos Lopez-Carlson

What people may not realize, he added, is that anyone can now create a Facebook group and select who they want to invite to participate and see posts. These more private spaces exist outside of the general newsfeed and their access can be controlled to invite in only those who share specific interests. Groups allow file sharing, polling, and a place where people can work on documents together. 

Interest lists are another useful new feature that Facebook users may want to take advantage of, he said. Interest lists are good ways to organize news by topic feeds. This can help people manage and limit the clutter of general newsfeeds. That way a Facebook user is more likely to see the news they want to see, for example about proposed amendments.

League program manager Sharon Emery touted the Twin Cities Daily Planet as yet one more important online resource, offering multiple opportunities for people to become involved, get their message across, and reach a large and different audience from more traditional media outlets.

Get Connected! community meetings are part of a larger project of the Twin Cities Media Alliance and Daily Planet. With support from the Bush Foundation, each Get Connected! event is planned and co-hosted with nonprofit organizations that work on one of six issue areas: education, work, health care, immigration, transportation, and the environment.  Get Connected! meetings are scheduled through October, and culminate in an annual fall media forum scheduled for Saturday, November 10, at UROC, the University of Minnesota’s Urban Research and Outreach-Engagement Center.

3001-3005 Lyndale Ave. S.
Minneapolis, MN 55408
  • Oh please. How friggin hard is it to get an ID?? Give me a friggin break. Ya gotta be a legal citizen to vote, and to do nearly anything in this country, ya need to have an ID...quit makin excuses and do whatcha gotta do. Sheesh people. This is pathetic. If you can't prove you're a legal citizen, you don't get to vote. Easy. - by Trish Mauzy on Sat, 09/01/2012 - 9:09am
  • Crock, there is no way to do anything in this country that does not require a picture id, that includes buy some cold medcines and get a social security check. - by Gus Seals on Fri, 08/31/2012 - 3:11pm
  • Could it be that no one has ever been covicted and there are no known cases of voter fraud because there is no requirement to show I.D.? My kids can go to the DMV and get a photo ID. Owning a gun is a constitutional right to, but you still must apply and, oh, show a photo buy one. - by Kim Huff on Sat, 09/01/2012 - 7:26am
  • Voter I'D laws are an effort to prevent the illegal aliens from voting. Seems that they have alot to vote for in Obama's delayed deportation program. Why should non-citizens have the right to vote? Everytime I vote, I have to show my drivers license, why not everyone else too? - by Brian Michael Taylor on Sat, 09/01/2012 - 9:35am
  • Crazy talk , it's not that republicans want an advantage it's that's democrat's need to cheat . My whole life I've had to show i.d . The fact is that dem's need the whino's in the street to vote for more handouts. - by Dennis James Drollinger on Sat, 09/01/2012 - 9:53am
  • Dear Gwen, Some things you forgot to mention and that most rational and functioning people would conclude is this. How would you ever know if voter fraud was being committed without a verafication process that deals with not only data base information but actual identity. Without a documented photo ID you have a weak link in the election process. You see the demo rats have made a profession out of voter fraud and just because Man has not been able to verify and pros acute does not mean that it has not been happening. Republicans and I are done with letting this continue to infect the election process. I wanted to go fishing the other day and went to get a fishing licence. I found out that I needed a photo ID so I needed to drive to the DMV with my birth cert and some utility bills and got my resident ID and went fishing. If someone cannot do that simple procedurt then they don't desetve to be able to vote, get it. Not everyone should be able to vote. First off is no representation without taxation. If you don't pay federal or state taxes, you donor have a right to vote and inter fear with the votes of tax paying individules, get it. That is the American way. re done with letting this continue to affect the election process and - by Richard Mcgarry on Sat, 09/01/2012 - 10:00am
  • If you are an American 18 years old or older you have the right to vote. All these attempts to deny a group of Americans the right to vote because they do not drive a car denies them their constitutional rights. - by Mike Shumate on Sat, 09/01/2012 - 9:50am
  • Gus...None of those things are "Constitutional" rights. - by James Mcnair on Fri, 08/31/2012 - 5:36pm
  • James, What about the right to bear arms?? There is an I'd check, background check and wait period before you can exercise those rights - by Eric White on Sat, 09/01/2012 - 9:33pm
  • Texas is the worst place for first-time voters. They did not let me vote despite having 1) Voter Registration Card, 2) Driver's License, and 3) permanent address. Can't trust Texans! - by Terence Tan on Sat, 09/01/2012 - 8:59pm

Our primary commenting system uses Facebook logins. If you wish to comment without having a Facebook account, please create an account on this site and log in first. If you are already a registered user, just scroll up to the log in box in the right hand column and log in.

Bruce Johansen's picture
Bruce Johansen

Bruce Johansen (brucejohansen [at] tcdailyplanet [dot] net) is programs manager, education and community engagement, for the Twin Cities Media Alliance, and an active resident of Minneapolis's Seward neigbhorhood.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Vote away your rights

They will pry the vote from my cold dead hands.

Voter ID?

The League of Women Voters seems perfectly content to see women unable to vote for themselves, forced to use blackboxes instead of real ballots.


LWV , Non Partisan? HARDLY!LWV

LWV is hardly non partisan!

voter id amendment

since the ridiculous gun rights issue is constantly cited as relative to any conversation, imagine if millions of people wanted to exercise their right on the  same day, or in a 12-hour period. It would not be possible to check ids. Maybe voting times need to be expanded to match the times that guns csn be sold.

ID to vote

Didn't you have to prove who you were to register? In the states I live and have lived in a person goes to the voter registration office and shows an ID to prove who they are and where they live when they register to vote. Just bring the same ID on voting day. As far as illegal voting, if the fellons in MN hadn't voted Frankin would probly not have gotten in. And then there was the Equidorian house keeper who said she voted for Obama. Not the American/Equidorian house keeper. It is the governments job to ensure my vote is not canceled out by an illegal vote.