100 million tons of unlovable plastic: The container-bottom numbers game

Rachel Cupp looking for plastic symbol on detergent bottle at Mississippi Market in Saint Paul

Every year 1.3 percent of the world’s crude oil and an equal amount of energy are used in the production of 100 million tons of plastic packaging that we will toss out almost immediately after we buy it. This is called “post-consumer” plastic and according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, only eight percent of the plastic we throw away gets recycled. Until recently what was accepted for curbside recycling were only bottles with a neck and the symbol #1 or #2 inside tiny recycling arrows. Now some local recycling programs have added more plastics but what is accepted differs by community, creating confusion as to what to put in our blue bin and whether this stuff is getting recycled.

Recently, Minneapolis announced that it will collect for recycling all plastics, labeled #1-#7. Hennepin County now requires recyclers to start picking up plastics labeled #3, #4 and #5 by the end of 2012. Are all those plastics really being recycled? Or are they going somewhere else?

FULL DISCLOSURE: The author, Susan Hubbard, is founder of Nothing Left to Waste, a consulting practice aimed at helping people to prevent waste. Before founding Nothing Left to Waste, Susan co-founded and worked at Eureka Recycling, a 501(c) 3 nonprofit corporation whose mission is to demonstrate that waste is preventable.

It’s About the Numbers – Or is it?

In the struggle to explain which of the thousands of plastics are recyclable the only way to distinguish between the different types of plastics is through the recycling arrows and numbers on the bottoms of the containers. Besides being nearly impossible to see, the numbers represent the type of resin used to make the plastic — not whether it is recyclable. To top it off, # 7 plastic is a general category for the thousands of other plastics that aren’t #1 through #6.

For plastics to really get recycled, what we put at the curb must be made into a new products or packaging and that demands a market. The company that picks up curbside recycling then delivers it somewhere (the market) to be recycled into something new. Not all of the plastic labeled #1 through #7, or even #1 through #6, has a market.

The Market’s Appetite for Plastic

#1 & #2 plastics, the market loves them. There are ample opportunities to make new products out of these plastics. But it is very different for #3 plastic. According to Steve Alexander, CEO of the Association of Post Consumer Recyclers (APR), the #3 plastics are simply a “contaminant to other plastics that can get recycled.” # 4 plastics are bags. While the markets for plastic bags are good, the bags need to go to grocery and retail store recycling bins because they create big problems for sorting machines at the recycling centers. #5 plastic looks better and better to the markets, especially as health and environmental concerns with plastic #3 and #7 increase. #6 plastic also has a bleak outlook for real recycling. A #6 manufacturer operates a drop off site in California. They won’t pay anything for it and you have to get it there.

As for #7 plastic, Alexander, from APR states “If the companies that collect plastics are not required to prepare it for recycling, that means separating it all out – then you can’t make sure it gets recycled.”

What Do We Put in Our Bin?

Last November, Hennepin County notified recycling coordinators that by the end of this year, plastics #3, #4 and #5 must be added to the old standbys #1 & #2. When asked why #3 plastics are required since there are no markets, Paul Kroening, Supervisor, Waste Reduction and Recycling at Hennepin County explained “We didn’t want to confuse people more than they already are so we left the #3 plastic in to simplify education but we are hoping that it will ultimately disappear in the packaging market place." Kroening said that they were hopeful that adding these plastics would “reinvigorate people’s interest and increase recycling in general.”

Scott Merkley, St Louis Park Public Works Coordinator said that they are working with the nonprofit that collects and processes their plastics, Eureka Recycling, to add more materials including other plastics. “Eureka has concerns about #3 in particular because they can’t find markets.” St. Louis Park’s contract requires Eureka to verify where they sell the materials to assure that they are being recycled. “Is there a market? We want to be honest with the public. If we collect it for recycling then it needs to get recycled.” said Merkley.

“Recycling isn’t just collection” said Bryan Ukena, Business Development Director at Eureka Recycling. “We won’t collect and ship plastic unless we know it is getting recycled. It just puts the environmental burden on another community”

David Heberholz, Director of Solid Waste and Recycling for Minneapolis said they decided to add #1 through #7 plastics in April, when Allied Waste Inc., the company that processes and sells their materials gave them the green light. Heberholz said Minneapolis’s current contract does not require Allied to provide proof that the material actually gets recycled but that the city is about to issue a new RFP for these services that will include that requirement. Rich Hirstein of Allied Waste did not return our calls. (The Minneapolis city website says: "Contracts require that all materials be sold for recycling purposes only.")

The Solution is Not in Our Blue Bin

Amy Fields, General Manager who led a recycling effort at the Eastside Food Cooperative for the past five years spoke from her experience operating a #1-7 plastics drop off there. “If people think they are recycling it, then they think it is okay to keep using it,” she said. Fields is convinced that this isn’t the consumers' issue but a legislative one, and points to the bottle deposit legislation which has been "stalled at the legislature for five years." Fields says she feels that it is demoralizing to be in a business that is forced to sell so much single use packaging. “Multiply our impact by millions," she said, "and that is the size of the problem.”

What do you think?

What kind of plastics do you recycle?

Do you think that cities should collect plastics in the recycling process, even if they won't be recycled?

When you put something in your blue bin, do you expect it will be recycled?

  • I think that we need to stop making needless plastic products and making disposable containers out of plastic, and buying stupid, cheap plastic toys and other inferior products that end up in landfill or being burned. Both disposal alternatives are harmful to the environment and the health of all living things. This I know about plastic: it is a petroleum product and it helps to burn up the other refuse in the garbage burner, so no, I don't trust that anything gets recycled. The idea of recycling plastic into furniture or other plastic products is not practical, to put it mildly. When they are turned into clothes or blankets, these eventually end up in landfill, thrown out without a thought. So that's a dead end. The trouble with not making all these products for the good little consumers of America is that the economy will suffer. Never mind that we are poisoning the earth, air and water. We could have an economy that is sustainable. But I don't think the 1% would like that. There are zillions of jobs that need to be done and need to continuously be done that don't harm the earth. - by Janet Nye on Tue, 08/07/2012 - 9:37pm
  • I just wish they would make the recycling numbers readable on all packages because right now the recycling symbol is so small on most and the number just blends in. There are times that even with a magnifying glass I can't tell what the number is on the plastic. Since I live in St. Paul, I can't just put all of them in the recycling bin, just the 1 & 2. Our society is aging but we're making the information on our packaging smaller and smaller. - by Wendy Dickerson on Wed, 01/16/2013 - 3:24pm
SusanHubbard's picture
Susan Hubbard

Susan Hubbard (susan [dot] hubbard [at] gmail [dot] com) is a zero waste advocate and aspiring freelance writer.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Thumbs up

Thanks for a thorough article. Plastic chasing arrows have always been a PR gambit by the packaging industry. Let's all please ask our favorite take-out to go to cartons and abandon the little plastic bins.

No-waste game

Excellent information by Ms. Hubbard to guide me in my 3"R"'s - Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle. I'll now minimize the purchase of #3 & #7 containers until I hear of a developing market for the same.

By the way, is there any market for shredding polystyrene (#6 - PS) for use as a lightweight filler in composite materials such as concrete, asphalt, maybe even in potting mixes?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <img> <span> <div>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Each email address will be obfuscated in a human readable fashion or (if JavaScript is enabled) replaced with a spamproof clickable link.

More information about formatting options