Parenting percentage bill going to the House floor

Heading to the House floor is a bill that would give fathers greater rights in child custody disputes.

HF322 would change current law to a presumption of joint legal and joint physical custody with a minimum of 45.1 percent of parenting time for each parent. A parent is currently entitled to receive at least 25 percent of parenting time.

It was approved on a split-voice vote by the House Ways and Means Committee.

Rep. Peggy Scott (R-Andover), the bill’s sponsor, said custody issues are generally worked out between the couple without court intervention.

“Two parents going into to a custody issue will have time to work this out on their own, and if they don’t, then the judge steps in,” she said. “This bill doesn’t say that out of the chute they have to have 45.1 percent parenting time. This bill allows flexibility.”

But this is projected to come at a $1.5 million cost to the General Fund in fiscal year 2013 and $4 million in each of the following two fiscal years. The cost reflects the additional court staffing that will be added, according to a nonpartisan fiscal note.

“I think this is a small amount of money to invest in making children have as close to equal access to both parents as possible,” Scott said.

There will be savings to the state in other ways, she said. “Children from single parent homes have a higher rate of teen suicide, drug abuse, teen pregnancy — a whole plethora of social problems that our counties and the state are paying for.”

Rep. Jean Wagenius (DFL-Mpls) disagreed.

“The assumption that this experiment will save folks money, we have no idea if this is the case or not. And I, for one, don’t believe it at all. To assume that you can use the model of a single parent raising a child and then say those kids have additional problems, and then moving it over and saying this will solve those problems? There’s no relationship.”

She noted the significant change in state policy regarding child custody issue that the bill proposes.

“I’m very troubled by changing the standard we have in the state which is in the best interest in the child, to essentially moving to a parent standard which is the best interest of the parent. I think we are taking a huge expensive road that is not good for children, either.”

The companion, SF1402, is sponsored by Sen. Pam Wolf (R-Spring Lake Park). It awaits action by the Senate Finance Committee.

Our primary commenting system uses Facebook logins. If you wish to comment without having a Facebook account, please create an account on this site and log in first. If you are already a registered user, just scroll up to the log in box in the right hand column and log in.

leeannwahi's picture
Lee Ann Schutz Wahi

Lee Ann Wahi blogs at B-Ville News, "because telling Burnsville’s stories enriches my life."


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

HF 322 fiscal note

This bill is a battle between Conscious and Self-Interest. Is it and any wonder why Senator Newman and Senator Thompson, Representative Smith,  Senator Latz and Representative Bobby Joe Champion may oppose this legislation. The Fiscal note was contrived with only the debit side of the balance sheet without considering the credit side of the balance sheet. Whom was responsible for the Fiscal Note? The Judiciary.  We are asking the Fox to guard the little hen house and telling the Fox not to nimble.  How insane! Everyone agrees it is best to have two parents in a child’s life.  The National average is 90%/10% of physical custody after a divorce. Give a voice to the children and stop the hypocrisy, when individuals are really only concern about their pocket book. Please Do what is best for the Children!!! As parents we sacrifice for our children. The greatest sacrifice is to give your life for another. Allow a parent to do best by their children. The children just want to be know and Love by their parents!!!