Is Minneapolis's North High a terminal case?
Photos of Superintendent Johnson and Board member Williams from last week's Board of Educaton meeting. All photos by James L Stroud.
To many, Minneapolis Public Schools Superintendent Bernadeia Johnson's recommendation to phase out North High School in three years finally confirmed a long-standing rumor that a "systemic" plan to close the city's oldest high school had already been in place for several years.
Coverage of issues of race and race relations, cultural diversity and immigrant health issues is funded in part by a grant from the F.R. Bigelow Foundation.
Johnson told the packed audience at an October 12 board meeting that previous efforts to boost the school's attendance, including adding a new international baccalaureate program, reducing the school's "walk zone" from two miles to one mile, and establishing a city-wide attendance area, have not been successful. That, and the fact that the district spends $4,000 more per child to educate North students than in the other six city high schools, left her no other choice but recommend closing North High.
"This can't be a decision based on what was, but what is," she said.
"There must be a minimum number of students participating to make it economically feasible and educationally viable," agreed Board Member T. Williams, adding that North High "might not be the school we need today." Although students once were required to attend only the schools in their neighborhood, "We are in the open enrollment era where students can go to the school of their choice," he noted.
"We need a school that can meet the needs of today's youth, and can engage the current community in helping it design and build that school. Whatever we do at North have to be competitive and attractive to parents in and outside of North Minneapolis, and outside the Minneapolis School District," Williams said.
However, as a Northside resident pointed out after Johnson publicly announced her plan last week, "North High is now off life support," where its future has been gingerly hanging on for several years now. Questions still abound on what ultimately caused North High to experience a 75-percent enrollment drop in six years, from over 1,100 students to the 265 students presently enrolled.
"I know people want to get into a point-by-point debate on what happened," said Johnson during an interview with the MSR last week. "But we have made several attempts to try to make North an attractive option for families in the community. I've been monitoring the enrollment at North High since January."
“All the elementary schools are gone — we don’t have anybody coming to North… Once you lose a school, you lose a community.”
However, some blame the Minneapolis School District's closing of several area elementary and junior high schools in recent years. These schools once served as North High's main source of students.
"[The school board members] have made some pretty lousy decisions as far as North Minneapolis in the last few years," said Buzzy Bohn, whose son graduated from North in 1995. "They closed the feeder schools - Willard, Lincoln and Franklin - and I knew that it would hurt North's attendance," she pointed out.
Said 17-year-old Tisha Rogers, who attends Henry, "All the elementary schools are gone - we don't have anybody coming to North. How we are going to get [North High's] enrollment up if all the middle schools are gone? Once you lose a school, you lose a community."
Others believe that when it came to North High, MPS offered only "defective promises."
“The community is not choosing North High as a school.”
"This decision has been hard for me," Johnson admitted last week, adding that North had the lowest test scores among the district's seven high schools: 26 percent are proficient in reading, eight percent in math, and four percent in science.
"You look at the overall academic achievement of the students in the school, and you look at the number of key staff members who have left the school, and you think about what is happening to students and what they deserve," said the superintendent.
"Ultimately I have to ask the question, 'If your children were high school age, would you send your children to North High?' The community is not choosing North High as a school."
Johnson also disputes those who contend that she has not supported the school or went back on her word. "I have supported the Friends of North [an alumni support group]... I said that I would keep [North High] for the 2010-11 school year, but if things didn't change, I would have to make a different recommendation for 2011-12. I was quite clear about that."
“This school board can no longer be trusted to educate anybody’s kids… The North High thing was the last straw.”
For Minneapolis NAACP President Booker Hodges, "The trust with the school board is nonexistent." Last week he strongly suggested that city parents consider pulling their children out of city schools.
"Parents in general just need to consider options other than the Minneapolis School District," Hodges told the MSR. "This school board can no longer be trusted to educate anybody's kids. At this point, there is a general feeling that they have no desire to educate kids in North Minneapolis. The North High thing was the last straw."
Hodges further explained that after the March 2000 settlement of an NAACP lawsuit that allowed more Minneapolis families access to suburban schools and magnet programs, the city's school board did not respond positively. As a result, Hodges believes the school board must take full responsibility for North's demise.
"Had they improved the schools back when the lawsuit was done, we wouldn't be having this conversation," he said.
"Everybody is looking for someone to blame," said Williams, who proposed last week that no decision on North be made until "a comprehensive plan" is completed that includes whether or not the school can be saved.
Johnson wants all students in her district "to get the best education" and believes that the community wants this as well, which is why the superintendent supports "Minneapolis College Prep," the two charter schools slated to open in North Minneapolis in the fall of 2011.
"It is a proven program that has worked in Chicago for a number of years, and they are interested in opening in North Minneapolis," said Johnson.
But some parents like Bohn do not favor MPS sponsoring two new charter schools next school year given North's decline. "I feel like [district officials] want to get rid of North so that they can turn it over as a charter school. That's very disturbing to me as a Northside resident," Bohn said.
Johnson and other MPS officials were scheduled to meet Monday evening with the community at North High. Although no final decision has been made, many feel that the school's fate has already been sealed.
“We have to be held accountable in our community for not continuously sending our kids over the years to Minneapolis North.”
"I think the writing has been on the wall for a while," noted KFAN personality Henry Lake, who discussed the North High situation on the sports station last week. "The problem is that we have to be held accountable in our community for not continuously sending our kids over the years to Minneapolis North."
Lake also brought up the "burn North High down" comment made several years ago by Minneapolis City Council Member Don Samuels, which gave an unfavorable impression of the school. Lake believes the comment caused "irreparable damages," adding, "It is a determent to the school that those perceptions continue to exist."
The MSR left several messages for Samuels requesting his comments on the proposed closing of North, but he did not return our calls.
"I felt like my education was superb," said 2009 North graduate Brittany Williams. "Test scores don't tell the whole story on what is going on there."
"This school is a viable high school," Tamela Washington-Green insisted. Her son is a 2010 North graduate, and she currently has a daughter in the 11th grade at the school.
She believes that by adding in three new programs - adult basic education, a school for teen mothers, and a charter high school - "They [MPS] have created a hostile learning environment in that building by physically changing how the campus is designed and set up." Washington-Green also blames district officials "for not putting out accurate facts" about North's current situation.
Marcus Owens, an area homeowner and North graduate, said he fears the community without a high school will adversely affect his property value. He also suggested that a new board - "a new, fresh set of eyes" - should take up the North High matter after the November elections.
"They're the ones who will have to reap what happens [if North High is closed]," said Owens. He added that what's needed is "a thorough analysis of the failures that led to this, the root cause on why students have left, but also the root cause on why students left the community in general."
Charles Hallman welcomes reader responses to challman [at] spokesman-recorder [dot] com.


We're people-powered journalism!
• Minneapolis Somali photographer 


Comments
The North High situation is
The North High situation is the result of many factors, including the NAACP lawsuit and historical actions by MPS and the community. When a school gets a reputation, deserved or undeserved, it is sometimes impossible to reverse it. There have been situations where a bad teacher 20+ years ago haunts a school today and, in one case, resulted in enrollment so low that the school was closed. The Minneapolis NAACP has to understand that the negative comments they are making will doom any chance of improvements at North, or other MPS schools. Given the current level of educational funding under the Pawlenty Administration no school district can support a school that does not have the enrollment to be financially viable. Any school that drops from over 1,100 students to 265 students is not sustainable. MPS would be doing a disservice to the students to continue North because at 265 students the school cannot possibly offer the selection of classes necessary for a quality education. Other school districts, including Anoka and Saint Paul, Minnesota's largest districts, have faced this and made the tough choice to close schools for the good of the educational program and the students
Superintendent Johnson's comments that the Minneapolis Board had reduced the school's "walk zone" from two miles to one mile is curious, disturbing, and systematic of the free and loose attitude that has driven MPS decisions for many years. Minnesota Statute §123B,86 requires that a district shall provide equal transportation within the district for all school children to any school when transportation is deemed necessary by the school board because of distance or traffic condition in like manner and form. How is it that MPS can offer one group of students preferential treatmemt over all others?
Preferential
The over all problems of the lawsuit are because the school board did not fix the existing problems in the schools. The community is what matters as a whole to over the best educaiton at what Tax payers are paying for to provide for their children. problem with closing multiple schools is a diservice and in asking for future support is an obligation they have not met. The Truth is simple opening brand new schools in it's place rather then fixing the existing one that has stood for over 100 years.
Unbelievable
What I find ultimately disturbing are the rash of comments being thrown around by people who are not, "directly" involved. In my opinion, Minneapolis School District is not directly involved. You have the government who manages to find an opportunity to squeeze dollars out of everyone's education by pulling from the impoverished areas first and then subsequently, creating opportunities for the richer districts. Realistically speaking, the only people who are going to be sending their children to North, are northside residents and homeowners, primarily minorities. Miniorities have been told and fed that suburban area schools provide a better, well rounded education! For who???!!!! Certainly not our students.
So we as parents believe the grass is greener on the other side and that North Mpls schools provide a risk to our students. We utilize the, "No Child Left Behind Law" and the option of "School Choice" which is fed to us from the district and from the state and from the federal. We then end up moving our kids out to "suburbia" for education and those schools create "one" diversity plan or one "understanding another culture" program in the school and the federal and state feed them money for every "racial project" that is taken on in a community that is predominantly white.
We as parents have to understand what is happening. We are moving out to these communities where they don't want us anyway and we're taking our children too and guess what, they don't want our children either! So now the kids are going to school, sitting and listening to the same information but the same help is not offered. Not all of that is racist, but it is simply that they have no idea on how to evaluate and educate our children based on what is needed from the home to the school yard. The reality is, that if we take our same household and its same functionality out to the suburbs, we have the same issues only we are further away from people who understnad how to help us.
This goes to our education. If we don't send our kids to community schools where we grew up, etc then others certainly are not! We need to keep some things for our students and for us and an area school is good for everybody. It keeps the community viable, property values higher, businesses with more revenue, school teachers and custodians working, students makig more of an effort to go to school.
Everyone's talking about school scores but I know for a fact that these other school districts in well to do suburbia did not make AYP. IF you talk to the president of those schools, they'll tell you that AYP is calculated incorrectly and parents should look at individual progress. One test doesn't define how well we can do something or what we comprehended from the test. My kids are doing very well at North High. As a matter of fact, this is the best that they have done in a few years and are exceeding expectations every day. Teachers and staff work with my kids to help them get the best out of their education with A and B work!
We use to say, that if we could make a difference in one child's life, all of the effort we put into it was worth it. My 2 kids that are there are doing the best they've ever done. I need North High School to stay open because without it, I don't know what will happen with my 2 teenagers education. They have yet to find success at any other high school and they've been to 6 schools in two years! I even moved closer to North High to make it easier for my children. I really hope the school board considers to WHOM they are making decisions for. It could impact my children greatly!
North High - Minneapolis
Turn North High, Mpls. into a 'Green High School' funded by every every Green funding instrument available. Let 'The Renewables Resesach and Policy Institutes' Consultants and Engineers define it's Sustainable path
1988 Graduate of North High
This makes me sad. The time spent busing kids all over the place could be spent studying. Now Mpls north kids have to get up even more early to go to school. Having a building without many windows certainly does not help. Many class rooms had a jail cell feeling about them. When I went to north it did feel like there wasn't enough attention spent preparing kids for college and maybe to much attention trying to keep problem kids in school. A good school can do both. What happen 6 years ago to change the enrollment?