Uproar over Kelliher's data-buy sets her apart in a way she didn't need

Just when Margaret Anderson Kelliher appeared to be pulling away from the pack running for governor with a series of endorsements, charges that she violated campaign-finance rules are setting her apart in ways she didn't need.
Her Democratic rivals for governor raised the alarm over the purchase of a voter database by donors to her campaign rather than by the campaign itself.
Kelliher and the DFL said she asked and was given a green light to have a third party pay for the database. But the DFL decided it wasn't kosher after all, and while her campaign has undone the financial arrangement, Republicans have now joined the outcry, with state Rep. Tom Emmer calling for Kelliher's resignation as House Speaker and the Minnesota GOP filing an official complaint.
Minnesota Public Radio has audio of Kelliher admitting her campaign's lapse:
We have since corrected the mistake. And I take responsibility for not having gone to, you know, directly to an attorney from the beginning of this. That process has changed on our campaign from here on out.
Here is the Republican Party of Minnesota's letter to Gary Goldsmith, executive director of the state Campaign Finance & Public Disclosure Board:
We are writing to file a formal complaint regarding DFL gubernatorial candidate and Speaker of the House Margaret Anderson Kelliher.
News accounts from the St. Paul Pioneer Press and Minnesota Public Radio raise deeply troubling questions about Speaker Kelliher's campaign finance activities and potentially illegal campaign coordination.
Minnesotans deserve a full and complete accounting of the following outstanding questions:
- When were the donations referenced by the Pioneer Press and Minnesota Public Radio made to Speaker Kelliher?
By whom were the donations made?
What were the amounts of said donations?According to the Pioneer Press, "At issue are donations made on behalf of Kelliher, apparently after her campaign reached its limit for nonelection-year donations. Money was given to the DFL, bypassing Kelliher to help buy a pricey database - called a Voter Activation Network, or VAN - of Democratic voters for her campaign's use."
"Under state campaign finance rules, candidates in non-election years can raise $500 each from lobbyists, political action committees and individuals. Once they reach $95,800, however - and Kelliher and several other DFL candidates appear to have hit that mark - they can no longer accept donations from lobbyists and PACs. However, candidates may still raise donations from individuals of up to $250 apiece. The Kelliher campaign asked individuals to help buy the VAN, which one source said costs $13,000. [DFL Chair Brian] Melendez wouldn't confirm that figure but said it was 'in the ballpark.' Such coordinated donations should count against a candidate's fundraising cap," the Pioneer Press further reported.
You were also quoted telling the Pioneer Press: "If there's a coordination like that, it would still be considered a contribution to a candidate."
"The donations also may run afoul of state rules against 'earmarked' donations, or donations made to a campaign committee with the express or implied purpose of being redirected to a specific candidate," the Pioneer Press added.
Speaker Kelliher's fellow DFL gubernatorial candidates have raised concerns regarding potential illegality. "I think there's some questions to be asked. Number one, I don't think it's legal. But also it seems like one candidate is getting preferential treatment," state Senator Tom Bakk told the Pioneer Press.
"If the allegations are true it's really upsetting. The issue would be the party playing favorites, but also it's apparently a campaign violation. ... Why in the heck would somebody think that that's OK to do?" state Senator John Marty told the paper.
Senator Marty further told Minnesota Public Radio: "I can't think of any reason you would say 'If you want to help me give it to somebody else.' The only reason I can think one wants to do that is if they're approaching the limits on how much we can accept from that source of money. In other words, to circumvent the contribution limits and that's what I'd be extremely concerned about."
"It's the responsibility of both Speaker Kelliher and the party to play by the rules. I hope going forward that we have a fair process because that's what the people deserve," State Representative State Rep. Paul Thissen told MPR.
Thank you for your attention to this very serious matter.
Sincerely,
Tony Sutton, Chairman of the Republican Party of Minnesota
Michael Brodkorb, Deputy Chairman of the Republican Party of Minnesota
The Twin Cities Daily Planet is an edited news source produced by professional journalists working in collaboration with citizen journalists from the local community. We publish original reported news articles, articles republished from media partners, and some content (Free Speech Zone articles, reader-submitted blog entries, comments) that is moderated but not edited. Click here for a complete description of our editorial policies. Support people-powered non-profit journalism! Volunteer, contribute news, or become a member to keep the Daily Planet in orbit. |













We're people-powered journalism! Click on story links (below) to see more story information, and then email editor@tcdailyplanet.net if you want to report.
• 
Comments
DFL's sexist double standard
To undermine the strongest candidate of the field. No outcry from the DFL when Rybak was guilty of similar violations, or as I've heard some say even more egregious violations from an ethical standpoint.
Which is why I don't often vote for Democrats anymore. They are, nearly exclusively, despicable.
Kelliher has the best chance of winning the governorship back from the Republicans for the first time in what, 2 decades? And this is what the party does?
Pfffft.
I guess MN deserves 4 more years of Republican rule, just like the US will deserve the ousting of the Democrat majority in the US Congress come next year.
Why? Because they are gutless, cowardly lizards who have no ethics, no principles, and stand for anything.
Corruption
There is corruption everywhere in our elections. What once seemed to be a sacred right is now something to be bought and cheated upon. The biggest problem is that none of it is done to help citizens. casino en ligne
corruption
I agree corruption is everywhere but just we should fight against it is too easy
Post new comment