OPINION | The courage of our convictions
If 21st Century Progressives led the 19th Century Abolition Movement, we'd still have slavery, but we'd have limited it to 40 hour work weeks, and we'd be so proud of the progress we'd made.
In earlier eras of U.S. history, progressives believed they could fight injustice and move society forward, and they did so. Today however, many progressives have lost faith in their ability to affect significant change. Many are content simply to tinker with problems, whether the issue is getting living wages for work, ending poverty, or removing toxins from our food supply.
For example, consider universal health care. All progressives claim to support this, but many aren't willing to fight for it -- not because they believe it's bad policy, but because they believe it is "politically unrealistic." When our proposed Minnesota Health Plan is offered as a way to deliver universal health care, some dismiss it as legislation that can't happen for decades. They talk about universal health care but offer and support proposals that are mere band-aids.
It is instructive to look back to the past. Despite the reality that men were the only ones who held office and the only ones who could vote, suffragettes fought and won the seemingly impossible goal of gaining the right to vote. In the 1960s civil rights activists believed they could get rid of segregation laws and get equal rights under the law. When told they were expecting change to occur too rapidly, Martin Luther King wrote a book explaining, "Why We Can't Wait."
Today, however, regardless of the speed of other changes in society, many progressives have lost hope. For them, such a book would now be titled, "Why We Need to be Pragmatic and Accept Token Change."
This timidity can be explained by decades of defeat at the hands of right wing politicians like Newt Gingrich and Karl Rove, which caused many progressives to retreat from a "Politics of Principle" to a supposed "Politics of Pragmatism" that is not only lacking in courage, but also has been highly ineffective.
Under the politics of principle, the progressive movement would fight for the goal, using pragmatic politics only to figure out how to promote the message.
But with the current politics of misguided pragmatism, some progressives calculate what is politically acceptable, and then determine what they will stand for. For example, using this "pragmatism," President Obama decided to push for health insurance for more instead of health care for all.
One cannot totally fault the President for failing to push for comprehensive reform. He shied away from principle-based reform because he knows that members of Congress working on health reform take big campaign contributions from the health insurance lobby and other powerful interests. He knows that they are afraid of nasty campaign attacks and believe they need the big money to win reelection.
"Pragmatically," Democrats in Washington are pushing for "universal" health care that isn't universal. They are pushing for reforms that cost more, not less, and policies that focus more on their sense of pragmatism than on real public health and prevention.
It's time for progressives to have the courage of our convictions. If we claim to believe in universal health care, we need to fight for it. The MN Health Plan -- which covers everyone for all their medical needs, and costs less than we are spending now -- is on the table. Those who are not willing to take on the powerful insurance lobby, ought to be honest and admit that reelection and other priorities matter more.
Refusing to fight for it because it is "not politically realistic" becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Likewise, dismissing it as something that will take decades to pass means leaving the problem to the next generation.
Whether the issue is living wages for workers, environmental protection, or LGBT equality, many progressives have lost courage. They fight to raise the minimum wage by fifty cents for every dollar that inflation takes away. Even in victory, we accomplish little.
It is time to move beyond fear and stand up for the principles we say we believe in. Minnesotans deserve nothing less.
The Twin Cities Daily Planet is an edited news source produced by professional journalists working in collaboration with citizen journalists from the local community. We publish original reported news articles, articles republished from media partners, and some content (Free Speech Zone articles, reader-submitted blog entries, comments) that is moderated but not edited. Click here for a complete description of our editorial policies. Support people-powered non-profit journalism! Volunteer, contribute news, or become a member to keep the Daily Planet in orbit. |












We're people-powered journalism! Click on story links (below) to see more story information, and then email editor@tcdailyplanet.net if you want to report.
• 
Comments
Bull
I have taken all kinds of heat from my friends on this issue, but I will speak my opinion. Say all you want about progressives not having the guts to support universal healthcare, but this is not the civil rights fight. This spending money we don't have. We are running the biggest deficits in the history of any nation in the history of the world. We have no money. We borrow money to just keep going, let alone add new programs. We have no money to grow healthcare coverage. I want free or cheap healthcare...who doesn't, but we have got to pay for it. By borrowing more money from the Chinese? By going bankrupt? You really think the senate bill will CUT the overall cost of healthcare in America? Well, you are the only one who does. Cut $500Bil from Medicare? Right. No one with any sense of how government programs operated and develop believes this.
Get the economy growing first. Get tax revenues growing first. It was a different ball game in the 60's when we had a young workforce to support Medicare and Medicaid. George Bush foolishly bought the 2000 election by pushing the drug benefit in Medicare. If crated a huge multi-trillion dollare future unfunded benefit.
This foolish article represents the proverbial ostrich with his head in the sand. Complete denial of reality. You have got to be willingly ignorant and delusional to write an article like this.
Why I support John Marty for Governor
This article highlights (for me) the critical difference between Marty and most of the other "liberal/progressive" folk running for Governor. John's leadership has shown courage and insight.
Marty's right
I believe the Wilder Foundation has committed to doing a $2 million study to determine how much the MN Health Plan (www.mnhealthplan.org) would cost. Rough estimates are that it would SAVE us 20%. Not only is universal health care the compassionate this to do, it's the economically prudent thing to do.
Pragmatism isn't. Realism isn't. Fighting for it is progress,
The status quo's best friends are the realists and the pragmatists. These people will never challenge the power disparities that are at the root of injustices.
What are they holding back for? They believe they are week and lacking in resources. But that is an illusion. We are strong, and collectively rich in capability.
Someone once said "Many people spend their lives asking themselves "Why?", I ask myself "Why not?"
If we don't open our minds to possibilties, they can't happen.
The most pragmatic result possible will always occur when those pushing for change go for that which people consider most just. Then they are guided and fueled by the fires of justice. the result seldom is as far as they reached for; but there always is the most possible gained.
The least pragmatic result always happens when those pushing for reform push only for what they consider most pragmatic to try for. People seldom get particularly fired up about this; they start from the assumption that they are weak, and so they ask for little and accept less.
John Marty gets it, and I really like him for governor.
Progressive Legislation
Thank you, Senator Marty, for posting this. This was my first glimpse into your character and the issues you stand for, and I must say, I'm proud that a person of your caliber is running for governor. I support your positions on every issue, and were you to get the DFL endorsement I would campaign for you tirelessly. However, if there is one thing that I've learned in watching the national health care reform debate unfold, it is this: we cannot have progressive legislation without progressive legislators. The governor may (like the president) be able to set the agenda, but it is the unique individuals in the State House and the Senate that will craft how that agenda manifests itself in the lives of the rest of the population. I want to see Minnesota move to a single-payer system for a variety of reasons, including both the financial and moral arguments, but I don't know how the state is better served by losing the chief author of the bill in the Senate. We need people like you to fight the good fight in the legislative body, to continue to push for universal coverage in the place where action can actually happen.
Post new comment