Close calls in dark corners: Questions about Minneapolis bike trail's safety
It was close to 10:30 on a Friday night when cyclist Allison Thoele's regular ride home turned ugly.
As she headed north on the paved trail that parallels the Hiawatha Avenue light-rail line, Thoele, 28, spied three shadowy figures lurking up ahead.
She briefly considered turning around, but - weary from a long day at work at the VA hospital and wanting to get back to her home in Northeast - she opted to employ a tactic used by many other cyclists facing would-be attackers. She rose high off her saddle, cranked up her speed and kept barreling down the trail.
But this time, it was the wrong decision.
The men jumped out of the bushes and wrenched her off her bike; her helmet cracked as she slammed onto the pavement. They pepper sprayed her in the face, and as she lay writhing on the trail, they demanded her money.
Hundreds of feet to the west, Hiawatha Avenue buzzed with the sound of cars moving too fast for their drivers to notice the trouble on the dark trail; to the east, desolate industrial buildings offered no help.
Luckily, the attackers gave up after Thoele insisted she had no money and started hollering for help. They left her on the ground, blinded and "blubbering," but not further hurt.
"I yelled and I screamed, and another biker came along and called the police for me," she said.
(Full disclosure: Thoele is a friend of the author.)
Thoele's attack, which happened in late September, has prompted her and others from the Twin Cities cycling community to reconsider the safety conditions along this north-south stretch of trail that connects the Midtown Greenway with downtown. The trail in question, which is owned by the Metropolitan Council, starts at approximately East 28th Street and ends at 11th Avenue, just southeast of the MetroDome. Compared to the Midtown Greenway, its more prominent east-west counterpart, the so-called LRT or Hiawatha trail is short: It measures less than two miles in length.

Although cyclists say the whole trail needs safety improvements, two particular sections of it give them pause. One, the spot in which Thoele was attacked, is between east 28th and 24th streets. Further north, a second problem area lies between the Cedar Riverside train station and the trail's end.
Advocates for hasty trail improvements say these sections, which are bordered by brush or industrial buildings, turn into danger zones after dark.
"It's pretty creepy," Robin Garwood, policy aide to Ward 2 Minneapolis City Councilor Cam Gordon, said. "It's just ripe for ambush."
But Bob Gibbons, director of customer services and public relations for Metro Transit, an arm of the Met Council that oversees the light-rail line, argued the trail conditions aren't so bad.
Trains frequently pass by, their headlights illuminating the trail and their operators serving as "eyes" that could spot any trouble along it, he said. There's also a transit police station just off the route, so if a train operator were to notice and report suspicious activity along the trail, transit officers would be close to the scene, he said. (Gibbons said he did not know, however, if a Metro Transit train operator has ever done so.)
While there may be no lights on the trail proper, there are plenty of "ambient" lighting sources that provide some trail illumination, he said. Gibbons cited as examples the intersection lights at 26th Street and Hiawatha Avenue, the lights from the Franklin Avenue and Cedar/Riverside rail stations, and those coming from the bars north of the Franklin Avenue station, like the Cabooze.
All these elements add up to the trail not being as remote as some make it out to be, Gibbons said.
"It's not like you're in the Boundary Waters, that's for sure," Gibbons said.
"What trail?"
Unlike the Greenway, the trail in question doesn't have a formal, easily recognizable name. Depending on which cyclist is talking, it's referred to as the LRT trail, or the Hiawatha trail, or as some combination of the two.
Or, in the case of some outside the cycling community - such as crime-prevention specialist Shun Tillman of the Minneapolis Police Department's Third Precinct - it's simply lumped in with the Greenway, and lacks a distinct name identity of its own.
One thing's for certain, though: whatever it's called, cyclists are using this trail. According to figures presented in the Capital Long-range Improvement Committee's annual report, an average of nearly 800 riders were counted cruising down the path during daytime hours. This makes the path the sixteenth-most traveled in the city when compared to other paths monitored in the count.
While the bikers have been counted, quantifying the number of attacks that have happened along the stretch is more difficult, Tillman said.
When the Greenway's 911 call boxes were installed, it was given a street address and corresponding coordinates, so emergency responders would know just where to go when an incident was reported. But the LRT trail hasn't been given these call boxes or a distinct street address, Tillman said.
This can make it difficult for first responders to find an incident scene, as well as for law-enforcement agencies wanting to track problems along the stretch, Tillman said.
The Greenway is owned by Hennepin County and is maintained by the city. Its better safety infrastructure, when compared to the LRT trail, is because trail investments were made after several people were attacked along the Greenway last year, Tillman said.
Tillman was quick to mention the positive results seen from the citizen efforts of the Midtown Greenway Coalition, which has implemented nightly volunteer safety patrols along the Greenway and LRT trail.
But on a bureaucratic level, there's yet to be the same level of effort put toward recognizing the LRT trail as a distinct place like the Greenway.
"It's probably going to have to be a group effort," Tillman said, "... to put everyone on the same ship."
The Daily Planet had little success when it put in a formal request to the Minneapolis Police Department for crime statistics along the trail.
"I have heard back from the analyst section that the material is in the queue to be pulled, but they cannot tell me when they will get to it due to higher priority law enforcement issues," Public Information Officer Sgt. William Palmer said in an email.
The Capital Long-range Improvement Committee was also unsuccessful in finding the data for its annual report, which establishes the city's capital-improvement priorities for the next five years.
"Public Works was unable to obtain current crime statistics for CLIC, but there have been several well-publicized attacks," the July report said. "Typical is the case of a Seward resident, who was knocked off his bicycle, beaten and robbed in a dark area of the trail near 24th Street last July. The attackers were able to see him coming and ambush him because of his headlight, a safety precaution for all responsible cyclists."
Bike-shop chatter and forum conversations found on Web sites such as Minneapolis Bike Love also suggest cyclists have good reason to be wary of traveling the stretch.
Reached through Bike Love, Dale Hammerschmidt, a commuter cyclist for nearly 47 years, recalled how he was assaulted on the trail in July 2007. Riding north toward the Franklin Avenue station, Hammerschmidt ran into four young men blocking the trail.
"The leftmost guy turned and punched me hard, with a closed fist, at the front of the right shoulder; a second blow to the head glanced off my helmet," Hammerschmidt, an associate professor of medicine at the University of Minnesota, said in an e-mail.
Hammerschmidt was able to make his way through the men and emerged mostly unharmed.
But the unprovoked attack, he said, was "was enough to strain a guy's pacifist ethic."
Red-tape obstacles to change
Stories such as these prompted CLIC to plan, in its annual report, for a $1.5 million light installation project along the trail. CLIC ranked the project in the top third of all of those needed across the city in the coming five years.
Right now, the project is slated for completion in 2013, a date deemed reasonable by the Department of Public Works. According to Don Pflaum, a Public Works transportation planner, it will take that long to put in place the funding, plans, contractors and permissions from the Met Council.
But, in the comments section of its report, CLIC strongly recommends the project's completion date be pushed ahead for next spring.
Pflaum called that "extremely aggressive."
"I can tell you it's unrealistic," he said. "2011 is the best-case scenario, and that's if all the chips fall into place."
From his office in Minneapolis City Hall, Ward 2 City Councilor Cam Gordon said he'd like the project to happen sooner than 2013.
"We want the base level of the (trail to) be of the same quality of the Midtown Greenway, because it's not even there yet," he said.
Gordon questioned whether the Met Council shouldn't be improving its own trail.
"It's great that when they put in the (rail) line, the Met Council put in a bike path," he said. "That's fabulous. But it's too bad they didn't put in sort of a finished, more useful bike path."
The city is stepping up, Gordon said, because trail-specific improvements aren't on the Met Council's immediate horizon.
The Met Council plans to build a "light-rail support building" off the trail near east 24th and 26th streets, Gibbons said.
He said lighting planned for the building will have the secondary effect of illuminating that area of the trail, where Thoele was attacked.
That project is "fully funded," he said, and will be completed by early 2011 at the latest.
Gibbons said the Met Council would welcome trail improvements from the city, and suggested it was the city's responsibility to do so in the first place.
"We think that's a terrific idea," Gibbons said. "We're in the public transportation business and primarily we operate buses and trains.
"We don't anywhere else in the region own a bike path," he continued. "But in the cities in which bike paths are developed, either the cities or the counties typically are responsible for the maintenance and the safety of those public facilities."
Biking around the problem
In the meantime, cyclists like Katie Meyer adapt.
Meyer, 39, takes the LRT trail every day as part of her commute to work. On a recent Wednesday, just before dusk, she made haste to get home. She schedules her commute, she said, so she's not out alone on the LRT trail after dark.
"Luckily, I have a very flexible work schedule, so I think I can travel on here when it's light out," Meyer said. "But in the winter, when there are only a few people out biking, it could be a problem."
Gabriel Hoffman, chair of the Midtown Greenway Coalition Safety Committee, said some cyclists choose to "ride dark" - that is, without any front light - if they're caught on a sketchy stretch of trail after nightfall. This tactic allows some cyclists to pass by would-be attackers unmolested, but it can lead to other collisions.
Tim Bekke, 24, works at the Hub Bike Collective and uses the LRT trail to get to work. Compared to Meyer, Bekke was less concerned about the trail's safety conditions after dark. He takes the trail at night, and he sometimes rides dark to escape notice.
"There were a couple of close calls - like branches in the trail - but it's totally doable," he said. "But (trail) lights would be nice."
As for Allison Thoele, she has become more cautious about her commute. If she's not going to get off work until late, she will drive instead of bike.
But she wishes she didn't have to.
"It really goes against our city's goal to encourage people to bike more and to use our city's resources already put into place to drive less," she said.
To Thoele, 2013 seems like a long time to wait for lights, especially in a city recently noted for having the second-highest percentage of bicycle commuters in the country.
"I think it's ridiculous that it's going to take that long - because I know I'm not the only person to have had an incident along there," she said.
"The next person to have a problem may not fare as well as me, and it seems like the city and the Met Council are really dragging their feet," she added. "Someone could get killed."
| Support people-powered non-profit journalism! Volunteer, contribute news, or become a member to keep the Daily Planet in orbit. |



















Comments
I'm tired of the finger pointing
Cyclists have been complaining about this trail since it went in. We've been asking for lights since it went in.
Saying that the trains coming along with lights on them does anything at all is absolutely insane. I'm embarassed for Donald that he would even suggest this. If anything, these trains blind bikers and pedestrians on the path - you can't look down the trail when a train is coming towards you.
At any rate, I don't care if it's the city, I don't care if it's MNDot. Quit pointing your damn fingers at eachother and actually DO something about it.
Close calls in dark corners
Excellent reporting. Thank you for your thorough analysis of this problem.
lights?
I have to ask if any of the people making statements about it having adequate lighting and not being so bad ever ridden this at night? Maybe they should get off thier fat arses and do this along with all of our worthless politicians. Hats off to the cyclists who have started a patrol. Maybe we all need to down there with pruners and other tools and start clearing the crap away.
Devin full-time bike commuter who rides this stretch EVERY day and thanks Odin for protecting him and who has NEVER seen a transit cop driving this stretch.
lights
The train operators better not be watching the trail on that stretch to downtown. There is a walk/bike bridge going over the tracks. They are to busy blowing a warning horn to be looking, and in the dark, for crooks. I would rather have them driving thanks. Smells like excuses, and bad ones at that. HC and MPLS are always trying to duck and cover. It's a shell game.
No more excuses: run temporary light poles until funds found
Congrats to the TC Daily Planet for this excellent story and short video piece on bike trail safety.
C'mon government! Get it together!
Surely the MTC/Met Council, Hennepin County and City can find a way to all work together here and gin up some money for some temporary lights along this stretch, until full funding is available. The power is already running there, so what's the big deal?
As for the MTC's Director of Customer Service and Public Relations: Bob Gibbons?
He should buy a clue. Perhaps he would be willing to back up his words about all the lighting on that trail, by volunteering to ride that unlighted trail every day for the next 2 weeks. Let's see how clueless he is, once "experiences" reality for awhile... Hmm... what's his job title again?
Mark S.
Seward Neighborhood
You live in the city--you can't be out at night in these areas!
I don't like that the thing I am going to say is true, but it is what it is: As city residents, we need to modify our routes after dark to avoid getting jacked up. Clearly, this trail is only for daylight use. When it's not light, you can use the LRT or other nearby streets that are better-lit, such as 26th Avenue and Riverside Avenue. Does it suck to have to use alternate methods? Yes, but it's also better to avoid an emergency-room trip.
As for the Greenway, anyone who thinks it's a good idea to travel in a railroad trench after dark needs to learn how to think straight.
Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.
Sick of avoiding the trails
Bicyclists supposedly have it good in Mpls, and
the city ranks high in the US for its bike-friendliness!
It's too bad that so many cyclists have to avoid riding
in car-free zones like the LRT and Greenway at night due
to assaults and muggings.
I used to turn off my lights and ride these trails anyway,
but I'm not interested in getting beaten up, and far
too many of my friends have been thrown from their
bikes, assaulted, and robbed for me to continue.
Kudos to those taking action to make city bikeways
safer through citizen bike patrols! Better lighting
and trail maintenance would improve things a lot,
as would police patrolling.
the depressing part
The most depressing part about this is that it's hard to refute what Chris David said (above): these routes just aren't safe after dark and that's not going to change anytime soon.
"It's not like you're in the Boundary Waters, that's for sure". Truer words were never spoken.
giving up
So according to Chris we should just not venture out after dark and let the criminal forces take control. With energy prices, bad government money management, and other factors in the future I predict things will get darker and if we do not stand up and take back the darkness we might as well give up now.
Safety for comfort...
Sorry, I put SOME of the blame on the victim.<br><br>
As she headed north on the paved trail that parallels the Hiawatha Avenue light-rail line, Thoele, 28, spied three shadowy figures lurking up ahead.<br><br>
She briefly considered turning around, but - weary from a long day at work at the VA hospital and wanting to get back to her home in Northeast - she opted to employ a tactic used by many other cyclists facing would-be attackers. She rose high off her saddle, cranked up her speed and kept barreling down the trail.<br><br>
IF you KNOW a situation is going to be bad, WHY go into it. She had the situational awareness to see it was not favorable, yet she IGNORED her own best advice.<br><br>
I don't live in the cities, and that is MY choice. Criminal activity cannot be tolerated. LEO's KNOW that there are places like this, but they would rather focus on traffic enforcement or DWI zones. Why can't the put a GEM car on patrol on these trails. Makes sense, and give the residents their public space back.<br><br>
But it still does NOT take away a persons basic responsibility to maintain situtational awareness and follow your own gut instinct. It's a natural instinct that too many ignore.<br><br>
In this case, if she had, she would have never been mugged.
defend yourself.
First thing is to avoid the situation, but if that fails a person has to be able to defend their self. Durring a stressful incident like a mugging a person falls back on to the level of training that person has. IF it is zero level of training it will hurt you. If you are going to use pepper spray train with it.
I am personally a permit holder, I train to protect myself from incidents and gun grabs. The same thing can be applied to a person's pepper spray, tazer, ect... that people carry. There are multiple different ways to defend yourself. I encourage you train and prepair for an attack and pray that it does not happen, but be prepaired if it does. Also getting different tools to help defend yourself does not hurt either. My self I carry my permited pistol and a C2 Tazer when I know I am going down areas that I know are not safe. Not every tool is the perfect end all be all device. But something is better than nothing. I also train monthly to keep myself up on top of my training. Some of you are saying that this person is paranoid. No, I am in the same boat as everyone else who wants call boxes and lighing in that area. Yet even with that there there will still be crime there.
Just remember these people want to HURT YOU, or possible KILL you, and you have to DO SOMETHING to defend yourself, because the police are 4 minutes away after you reached a call box or a cell phone. As a past vicitim there are little to no time to reach for that cell phone or run to that call box, you have to DO SOMETHING to save your life.
Self defense is a Human right, and I plan on defending myself
Post new comment