Friday, Nov 20, 2009
workaround

User login

S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
 
 
 

workaround
view counter
view counter
view counter

Time for a new politics of the center

May 11, 2006
So, Michelle Bachman is endorsed for Congress in the 6th District by a Republican Party faction and Keith Ellison in the 5th by a Democratic Party faction. Unfortunately, the people are left behind.

These endorsements reveal that the two major parties in Minnesota have gone astray, seeking fidelity with their base of ideologues. Each party proposes to save America through moral conformity. America, however, needs saving from the cultural attacks of these two self-centered extremes: on the right, intolerance and self-righteousness; on the left, intolerance and self-righteousness. In the center, apathy and resignation.

Republics, however, grow from the center; they die when passions, ideology or self-interest take over. To destroy the center is to destroy America.

Michelle Bachman’s Christian holiness is not patriotic. Neither the Declaration of Independence nor the Constitution provide for religious tests for holding office. In fact, the Constitution outlaws such intrusion of messianic fervor into republican deliberations over policy and social regulation.

Nor is Keith Ellison’s multi-culturalism patriotic. A passion for all values is a commitment to none. As Dostoevsky once put it: “when everything is permitted, nothing is permitted.” Under such moral and intellectual conditions, Dostoevsky knew that there could be no anchor for the state, no security for the psyche, no grounding for conduct — only power, money and selfishness as guides to politics.

Under the open norms of multi-culturalism, everyone is a perpetual victim, always slighted and denigrated by others who demonstrate lack of empathy with one’s values and lifestyle choices. The struggle for equality and justice under multi-culturalism must go on forever as long as “others” are out there to be intimidated and cowed into acquiescence.

Tellingly, Keith Ellison is not out of the mainstream of today’s Democratic Party. His endorsement was warmly greeted by 4th District Congresswoman Betty McCollum, who said “Keith Ellison has the heart, and his values reflect the best of our Democratic values – he will be a voice in Congress for justice, for hope and for opportunity for all Americans.”

Patriotism implies loyalty to a national community that has a redemptive vision and a purpose. Michelle Bachman’s would-be America is too narrow in its redemptive possibilities; it is a cult gathered out of fear and living in the hubris of its own superiority. On the other hand, Keith Ellison’s community has no core, no discipline, nothing but the un-redemptive energies of self-absorption. This is not a patriotism but more an agenda for endless indulgence.

American patriotism was best expressed in the consensus-building loyalties of Washington and Lincoln to a greater good respectful of human dignity. Had either President been divisive and self-righteous, he would have failed in his charge of leadership during terrible times of ideological strife. Both the right and the left have today abandoned the American dream of responsible individualism. It is time for a new politics of the center.

Stephen B. Young is executive director of the Caux Round Table, an international organization that promotes the implementation of ethical business practices worldwide, and author of Moral Capitalism.

Article Tags:

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Stephen B. Young in his

Stephen B. Young in his erratic, meandering and poorly argued editorial argues that Keith Ellison is no good for Minnesota and that we CD5 denizens have no core and no discipline. I haven't been so insulted since ... well ... just the other day when a friend told me I'm a horrible driver. He argues: "Michelle Bachman’s Christian holiness is not patriotic. Neither the Declaration of Independence nor the Constitution provide for religious tests for holding office. In fact, the Constitution outlaws such intrusion of messianic fervor into republican deliberations over policy and social regulation. Nor is Keith Ellison’s multi-culturalism patriotic …" and proceeds to rant about how Keith and Michelle Bachman are no good for Minnesota and furthermore: "Republics, however, grow from the center; they die when passions, ideology or self-interest take over. To destroy the center is to destroy America." Has Mr. Young forgotten that this nation was founded by immigrant ideologues? Strong ideologies are an integral part of American history and I would argue our psyche. The intent of his argument or what I can gather (because it is so poorly constructed) is that 200 people deciding that Bachman and Ellison should be the candidates for their respective parties disenfranchises the apathetic middle for whom Mr. Young has anointed himself their knight in shining armor. What I think is the real intent behind his sniveling disguised as philosophy is to give someone like Mike Erlandson a reason to run. read the rest of my response at: www.mnblue.com

I kind of agree with Young's

I kind of agree with Young's analysis. But whether it's right or left or in the center doesn't matter so much. We need to have a vision of the kind of society we want and take steps to go there. Young is too pollyannish about our future under globalisation. He thinks we can have an economy based on nanotechnology. I don't think that will work, especially in regards to employment.

This article along with Bill

This article along with Bill Salisbury's Pioneer Press opinion this week are so needed at a time like this in Minnesota. Minnesotan are not this far apart, we are not devisive people. I wish more people could read both Young's and Salisbury's thoughts as they are right on and just the kind of rhetoric we need at a time like this. We need thoughtful leadership. I'm just glad I finally glad there have been two thoughtful and credible journalists as they have been few and far between in Minnesota as well.

mr. young's commentary says

mr. young's commentary says absolutely nothing. all he seems to know is what he DOESN'T want. as far as i can see, mr. ellison EARNED his endorsement by appealing to DFL regulars and people concerned about the Iraq War. that isn't radical--that IS moderate or centrist. And as far as ms. bachman's politics, this country is represented by people who espouse them--the Bush administration. SOMEBODY voted for this guy, even if the election was stolen by dirty politics. it's time for a BIG correction, and Ellison could be said to represent the kind of change we need. To say that all that Ellison represents is multiculturalism is absurd--though the idea of multiculturalism is not a bad one--as long as it teaches tolerance and understanding--my friends include Christians, Muslims, Catholics, Lutherans, pagans, Native Americans, African Americans, Swedes, Germans, Irish, Jewish--there ARE cultural differences between all these groups, yet I count them all my friends. are all mr. young's friends homogenous? GET REAL!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <img> <span> <div>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

workaround

News Day

News you can use

Related content