New legacies between old friends
A war leaves many legacies.
This month, on July 11th, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made a historic trip to Laos, the first time in 57 years. I tried to put it into perspective for my young niece, who was having a hard time wrapping her head around what it really meant.
When I try to explain to her that a Secretary of State hasn't set foot in Laos for almost 6/10ths of a century, it clicks a little bit. When I tell her that her grandma was only 1 year old then, it clicks a little more. Halley's Comet comes by only once every 75 years or so, in comparison.
I tried pointing out a few trivia facts.
That in 1955, Albert Einstein died that year and the war began between North and South Vietnam. Scrabble debuted and for the better part of the year, “Rock Around The Clock” was the #1 song. She looked at me like I was from Mars as I tried to sing the lyrics to her.
I even pointed out that Bruce Willis, Chow Yun-Fat and the inventor of Tae Bo were born that year, but I realized I was stretching.
So, I tried to break it down for her by pointing out that after 57 years, we're supposed to be happy with a single day. Somehow, we have to hope in that in those 24 hours, everything that could be said, should be said, would be said amid all of the photo ops and the safe speeches, the symbolic gestures and efforts to observe diplomatic formalities.
There was once an old USAID worker named Ed Buell who worked in Laos during the war. He believed that anyone who spoke English in the country didn't understand the real problems of Laos at all. It’s easy to see how someone might come to that conclusion.
I was born in 1973, the year the secret bombing in Laos stopped, a bombing campaign that would leave Laos the most heavily bombed nation of the 20th century. There are more bombs than people in Laos.
Almost 40 years later, we're still trying to remove nearly 1/3 of the bombs that had been dropped on Laos because they failed to detonate properly. Thirty percent of the victims are children under twelve. Many of their parents hadn't been born when the war ended. In the US, children sing about London Bridge falling down. In Laos, we have to sing songs not to touch any of the bombs that cover almost 30% of the Lao countryside.
A few months ago, I had a talk with some friends who wished I wouldn't focus so much on the war or unexploded ordnance issues in Laos because it makes it sound like the whole country is covered in bombs, when it's really a beautiful place, otherwise. They felt I should use my voice to speak more about the poverty in the rural areas and the need for education and good nutrition and modernization there. I could have drawn them the diagram between a family's inability to farm or send their children to school safely because of the hazards of UXO, or the devastating effect trying to get a family member to the hospital can have on all of a family's limited finances in those zones.
I tried not to laugh, but it seemed ridiculous to use a "half-full or half-empty" view that we've still got 2/3rds of a bomb-free country and somehow "that ain't bad."
I point out to my niece that much of the work being done today to rebuild Laos has come from people like her taking a stand. Of finding any way possible to get their voice heard, and to understand their rights to ask for solutions.
As my niece watches the pictures unfolding on the internet of Secretary of State Clinton's visit, I can see she's starting to process what it means to be Lao in the world. What it means to be an American, and considering why many of us embrace the term Lao American. Why we might want to hold onto the best of our 700 years of tradition even as we rebuild in a 236-year old country. What we might bring to the great American tapestry, and what American ideas might flourish in Laos. I hope she can see that neither of our nations has employed perfect statesmanship over the centuries, but we can keep working towards it as an excellent ideal.
It’s thinking like that that I hope continues to be part of not just a peaceful legacy, but a growing legacy.



We're people-powered journalism! 
• Juventino Meza 


Comments
On Dr Pao Saykao’s important posting
This is a very interesting posting and goes to the nub of the matter.
I am not here referring to the judgments drawn at the end, but to the main issue of whether there were N Vietnamese troops in northern Laos (not the Ho Chi Minh Trail, where there were quite apparently large numbers of Viet Minh).
I have seen figures ranging up to 71,000 N Vietnamese soldiers in Lao PDR (this figure was given in the 1st Edition of the Lonely Planet Guide to Laos, 1994, by Joe Cummings, and repeated in subsequent editions, and comprised 34,000 combat troops, 18,000 support troops, 13,000 army engineers, and 6,000 advisors: in addtion, there were, so says the LPG, 7,000 Chinese troops in the north).
Noam Chomsky and Fred Branfman, in contemporary accounts, quote a US embassy official as saying that there were never more than a few thousand N Vietnamese troops in Northern Laos.
So, which of these is true? Has anyone seen the definitive evidence to support either view? Definitive means based on original documents, preferably from the Vietnamese archives.
As an example, a book entitled The Road to Freedom: the History of the Ho Chi Minh Trail (2006) by Virgina Morris, contains substantial details of the North Vietnamese army engineering units deployed in creating and maintaining the multiple branches of the Trail. The details come from original sources made available to Ms Morris. Do we have similar materials available on the North Vietnamese troops stationed in or deployed to Northern Laos?
I should be very pleased indeed to receive any information on this.
Cleaning UXO in Laos
Nice piece of reading... Thank you for put that in such perspective.
Another you have forgotten to mention is that WHY those bomobs were dropped in Laos. We know that thw Americans dropped those bombs... and today every ine us very aware of the UXO and many countries (eg.myi Oz country has been given $$$ to help to clean those UXO) and it is heart-warming to hear finally that the US is now decided to provide some $90 millions to this UXO clean up.
Let's come back to the missing bit.. WHY those bombs were dropped? And sure.. the USA dropped them so the USA has the reposbility to help to clean that up... But WHY dropping those bombs?.
Those bombs were not dropped to kill the Lao people, not even to kill the Pathet Lao soldiers but the bombs were target the more than 60,000 North Vietnamese soldiers and "volunteers" in Laos, to keep the Ho Chin Minh trail running and to "liberate" Laos from the Imperarist as part of their "international" responsibity as a communist!
If there was no North Vietnamese troops in Laos, there would be NO bombs to be dropped.
Hence, when we come to talk about the problem of the UXO, a BALANCE view needs to be prseneted.
Both the Americans and the Vietnamese are the TWO responsible parties.
Both of them should be in Laos to start cleaning these UXO. So far, we have not heard any one calling on the Vietnamese to come in to clean up these UXO. Why?
Dr Pao Saykao
Australia.
Post new comment