OutFront Minnesota rally: Jeff Wilfahrt speaks to his son's humanity, and for human rights for all

Jeff and Lori Wilfahrt of Rosemount, grew up in New Ulm, the son of Leo and Ruth Wilfahrt, and daughter of Betty Schaefer. They married and lived in Rosemount, where they raised their family, including Cpl. Andrew Wilfahrt, 31, who died in Afghanistan six weeks ago when an IED exploded.
Jeff Wilfahrt spoke today to a rally sponsored by OutFront Minnesota on the wind-swept steps of the State Capitol in St. Paul as part of the GLBT political advocacy group's yearly Day on the Hill. Andrew Wilfahrt is thought to be the first gay Minnesota soldier to die in the service of his country in the war in Afghanistan.
His sister has said that her brother's sexual orientation was the least interesting thing about him, a remark Jeff Wilfahrt repeated to the crowd today. The elder Wilfahrt's speech, which he read from a statement he prepared, cuts directly to American values and the creation of the American system.
I apologize for the sound quality--at the beginning, the cold April wind carried Wilfahrt's words away. But listen carefully (and the sound gets better as the wind dies down) to a father made a "better human being, a better American, and a better Minnesotan" by the life and death of his beloved son.
Update: Jeff Wilfahrt kindly sent the prepared text of his speech:
Greetings to all, and thank you for the kind introduction.
I have no authority for what I am about to say. My only claim to fame is that I am the father of a fallen Minnesota soldier, the eighteenth to die in Afghanistan since 2007.
To all of you here in attendance and to all of those who serve in the Capitol of the great state of Minnesota I tender these following remarks.
Each of you here today are, first and foremost, a human being, you are in all likelihood an American, and you are in all likelihood a Minnesotan.
Each and every one of you can be described by height, by weight, by eye color, by hair color, by ethnicity, by gender and by sexuality. You were born with these things, not a single descriptor I've stated is a choice.
Each of you has chosen a life arc. You choose with whom to associate, you choose your creed, you choose your politics; you choose your work life. These choices each of us make as humans, as Americans and as Minnesotans.
We had a son. He was gay, he didn't choose it. But he did choose as his life arc to serve in the Army with the 552nd MP Company. He died in Kandahar just six weeks ago. It was death by IED while on foot patrol.
Around ten o'clock that February Sunday morning there was knock at our door. As I approached the door I saw them, two Army officers, in full dress, I knew what this meant.
They asked me to identify myself. When I had stated my name they asked to enter our home. The news was delivered at our kitchen table; news that no one wants to hear.
To all of you as Americans, to all of you as Minnesotans I tell you that you can be proud of the American Army. They treated our family with kindness and respect. They do not give up their dead easily.
Our son had no significant other. But he did have a home and a family which never questioned his sexuality; it is as I have said not a thing about which he had any choice. And as his sister said, "it was the least interesting thing about him."
Having no significant other his mother and I were named as his beneficiaries in the event of his death. I can tell you that a dead soldier is worth one hundred thousand dollars. In Canada it is two hundred and fifty thousand dollars. If you are a banker on Wall Street, your bonus is in the millions; and the bailouts are priceless.
The Minnesota Family Council is raising something in the neighborhood of $4.7 million dollars to promote a ballot referendum to place an anti-gay marriage constitutional amendment on the 2012 ballot. You can see that one hundred thousand dollars stands no chance against the collections from the church pews or $100 dollar dinner entrance fees.
They believe marriage is endowed with some sacredness, and indeed it may be within a creed, and creed as you recall is a choice. They believe that marriage should be between one man and one woman. And I ask them how will that be judged?
I challenge the one man one woman champions to define manliness or womanhood. Will you as a human being, an American, a Minnesotan be asked to open your trousers and to have your skirt lifted when applying for a marriage license?
And what will they do with the androgynous, the hermaphrodites born into this world? Again, this is not a choice. Will the androgynous be allowed to marry themselves as man and woman?
Many of the founding fathers were Deists. They were derived of European stock and knew all too well how religion within the political sphere was a corrosive thing. They turned to the Native Americans, in particular the Iroquois nation, to help form a model of government that would intentionally separate powers, and intentionally separate religion and state. Their model was a secular one
So let us go back to that Sunday morning six weeks ago. Let us human beings, us Americans, us Minnesotans assume for the moment that it had been a significant other to our Andrew who had answered that door.
Would there have been a death benefit? Would he have been offered a chance to go to Dover to receive his remains? Do you, as human beings, as Americans, as Minnesotans believe this denial of civil right to be proper and just?
To deny civil rights, including the right to civil union, to this soldier son of ours, whose life was given in service to this country, is to cast shame upon us as human beings, as Americans and especially as Minnesotans. We are better than that, I know we are, and we must make a change.
We can choose to be Minnesotan, we can choose to be American, but we cannot choose to be human, and that takes us to inalienable rights; the very civil rights our constitution is intended to guarantee. Let us not stumble into the folly of discrimination.
Ours is a secular society for a reason and that is to prevent religious doctrine from clouding our commitment to equal rights. We have not conquered all our difficulties; we have not resolved all of our social ills. We continue to make choices about change.
To the immigrants among us, I say welcome. Help us change. Help us with our melting pot; help us embrace the mosaic of life we humans represent. My sons' ancestors also immigrated here, I have not forgotten.
To the Minnesota Legislature I ask that you stand tall, on principle, on civility, and on the constitution of Minnesota; and I quote from the Minnesota Bill of Rights:
Sec. 2. RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES. No member of this state shall be disfranchised or deprived of any of the rights or privileges secured to any citizen thereof, unless by the law of the land or the judgment of his peers.
I hope my son didn't die for human beings, for Americans and for Minnesotans who would deny him civil rights.
If an anti-gay marriage amendment succeeds, I give you my vow that I will fight it to the Supreme Court of Minnesota to answer the question of what is a man, what is a woman.
I thank you, but mostly I thank my son who made me a better human being, a better American, and a better Minnesotan.
Be good to those you see today, it is the grease of humanity.
Photo: Cpl. Andrew Wilfahrt, 31, of Rosemount, Minn., was killed Sunday, Feb. 27, 2011 by a bomb while on patrol in Afghanistan. (Photo Courtesy of Jeff Wilfahrt via MPR)
The Twin Cities Daily Planet is an edited news source produced by professional journalists working in collaboration with citizen journalists from the local community. We publish original reported news articles, articles republished from media partners, and some content (Free Speech Zone articles, reader-submitted blog entries, comments) that is moderated but not edited. Click here for a complete description of our editorial policies. Support people-powered non-profit journalism! Volunteer, contribute news, or become a member to keep the Daily Planet in orbit. |
Sally Jo Sorensen publishes Bluestem Prairie for those who prefer take their corn with a progressive chaser.














We're people-powered journalism! Click on story links (below) to see more story information, and then email editor@tcdailyplanet.net if you want to report.
• 
Comments
(Civil Law) Marriage is a Fundamental Right of Each American.
(Civil Law) Marriage is a Fundamental Right of Each American.
The United States Supreme Court has held several times that marriage is a fundamental right. The Court was referring to civil marriage, not religious marriage. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution creates the separation of church and state, and provides that no religion shall be establish for all.
For insight into the Federal Constitutional issues involved in marriage equality, go to the website YouTube, then enter search words:
Cato constitutional marriage equality
For another insightful interview, enter the search words:
Bill Moyers Ted Olson David Boies
Lori Wilfahrt Speech at Outserve October 2011
Thanks to the Internet, I watched the mother of U.S. Army Corporal Andrew Wilfahrt (Killed In Action in Afghanistan in 2011) speak at the first conference of OutServe.org (The Association of Actively Serving LGBT Military Personnel) after the repeal of the military's discriminatory Don't Ask Don't Tell (DADT) policy. Lori Wilfahrt's speech was elegant: graceful, dignified, and powerfully simple.
Andrew Wilfahrt's legacy is just beginning because of the extraordinary efforts of both his parents for the cause of marriage equality. For military and civilian gay people, marriage equality would mark the end of the last major vestige of government-sanctioned discrimination in our country. The ideal of equality is baked into the soul of America. The Founding Fathers considered the ideals of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness to be unalienable rights, even though their own lives did not reconcile discrimination based on race, gender, and sexuality. The reconciliation of the ideal in concept with the actual experience of equality has taken hundreds of years. Andrew's legacy now contributes to that reconciliation of equality, through the speeches of his parents (multiplied on the Internet) and conversations around "Andrew's Round Table."
I can imagine that the spirit of Cpl. Andrew Wilfahrt is dancing for joy to experience his mom and dad speaking with such elegant power. With grace and dignity, they are embracing positions of advocacy accidentally arising because their son (who happened to be gay) had the courage to volunteer for the military, and gave his life serving a country founded on the ideal of equality.
Not a good example of what were fighting for
I'm very sorry that this man lost his son. I appreciate the sacrifice he made for his country. I don't think this is a good argument for changing the definition of marriage. First of all, he DIDN'T have a partner. So it's a moot point there. Second, marriage is NOT A RIGHT. I don't know how many times you people have to hear this before it may sink in. It is a religious sacrament defined by God. He is the ONLY one who can change it's definition. I don't thnk that's going to happen. If they want some legal rights let them fight for that but DON'T call it marriage. As a side note, if his sexual orientation was the least interesting thing about him why are the parents allowing themselves to be used to promote the agenda of gay advocates?
Anonymous-my rebuttal
First off why the anonymous, afraid to expose yourself? Supposing you are correct about marriage having been defined by god, then why does marriage exist within the secular legal realm? This god of yours didn't write the constitution did he? And just where are these definitions by god written, would it be the missing stone tablets of Moses you refer to, or the translations from the Hellenes of the Bible? Now this would be the god who apparently screwed up allowing roughly one in one hundred births to be hermaphroditic, where did he write down whether this is male or female? Hold your beliefs within the confines of your church. Maybe you're a Mormon and think Eden was in Missouri. Maybe you're a Sceintologist and are waiting for the spaceships. I don't know, I don't care. But so long as we function under laws, which we do, then marriage should be simply the union of two human beings without sexual distinction.
And as for my son's sexuality, it was part of him, a thing over which he had no choice. He was born to it. He was man enough to lay down his life in service. Are you man/woman/hermaphrodite or anonymous enough to grant him civil rights? I already know your answer because you are a philistine.
Post new comment