Asian carp invasion means disaster for Lake Superior
The Asian carp emergency is not an overblown issue. The threat facing the Great Lakes is very real.
History has shown that the voracious, highly adaptive fish will eat everything in sight when given the chance. The Asian carp are banging on Lake Michigan's door, and unless the U.S. Supreme Court rules tomorrow to close the locks in the Chicago River, the Asian carp will break the door down and burn the Great Lakes fishing industry to the ground.
Led by Michigan, six Great Lakes states, including Minnesota, have sued Illinois, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago to close the locks in order to prevent disaster. But Illinois refused, and unfortunately, President Obama sided with his home state. The President has been a Great Lakes supporter for many years, but on this issue, he is choosing industry over the Lakes.
The shipping industry cried foul the minute the suit was filed saying closure of the locks will hurt their $30 million business in the Greater Chicago area. This seems like a small hiccup compared to the $7 billion Great Lakes sport and commercial fishing industry that will be decimated if the Asian carp enter the Lakes.
And the "Land of 10,000 Lakes" has every reason to be concerned. Lake Superior -- the largest and cleanest of the Great Lakes -- supports a large, healthy fishing industry. If the carp enter the fresh water system, they will eventually find their way into Lake Superior tributaries and our beloved Minnesota lakes. The economic damage, not to mention the irreparable environmental harm, of a collapsed Great Lakes fishing industry will be severe for our state and the region.
The Supreme Court must rule in the best interests of the Great Lakes and the tens of millions of Americans and Minnesotans who rely on them to close the locks while a better solution is hatched to stop the Asian carp.
Allowing them to simply enter the Great Lakes is a devastating option.
The Twin Cities Daily Planet is an edited news source produced by professional journalists working in collaboration with citizen journalists from the local community. We publish original reported news articles, articles republished from media partners, and some content (Free Speech Zone articles, reader-submitted blog entries, comments) that is moderated but not edited. Click here for a complete description of our editorial policies. Support people-powered non-profit journalism! Volunteer, contribute news, or become a member to keep the Daily Planet in orbit. |














We're people-powered journalism! Click on story links (below) to see more story information, and then email editor@tcdailyplanet.net if you want to report.
• 
Comments
Carp
We need Gov and State officials to stop them from moving further north. It would ruin Mn fishing and northwoods life. Close those locks and figure out a way to kill them.
Here we go again...
The same things were said about the alewives and salmon.
well also they could come
well also they could come into lake superior and that could cause a big problem.
invasive s
Another problem that the southern fish farmers pose is the interstate transportation of fish using natural waters.
As bills like H.R.3669 address the problems of invasive species by private pet owners, it should be noted that fish farmers have had meetings with officials of the Federal government discussing their belief that waters of fish being brought into our country need to be considered for problems. As industry will play an important role in helping keep our waters clean, problems including interstate transportation with no federal endorsement, disease, virus, invasive and chemical use are all problematic as fish farmers move their fish across state lines without considering the quality of water used or what is added. If legislation to eliminate exotic species and ornamental fish from being imported into our country is enacted domestic production and the transportation problems should increase. This water often ends back in our natural waters. Some fish farmers will deliver fish through fed –ex by air to all states. They even have a bait fish that has a patent pending that will live in salt or fresh water, which they will deliver this way. The Presidents Ocean and great lakes initiative is aware of this problem and how states such as mine did not bother to address water as problematic so long as the fish had an inspection using an international standard of fish testing with in the last year in another state out of any jurisdiction without regard for the water. Fish transported and sold in the US often change hands many different times with many different water changes and chemicals used without regard for state laws during transportation. In some states such as NY they can be brought into the state from anywhere in the country without worrying about water disposal. I have seen the transport water and it is often milky, suds, full of scales, dead fish, invasive (crabs, polliwog, etc.) with the possibility of pathogens and virus. In the mid 1990’s as the fish being delivered from Arkansas to me were dying of disease, it was not uncommon to see bait fish, ornamental s, food fish on the same truck being spread out from tank to tank as space was freed up, as I know I often added more water to take them to their next delivery. This water and the fish are often unloaded from tanks on trucks through pipes to tanks fed by natural water where the overflow is back into natural waters. I am in the industry and do believe that mandatory safe procedures can solve this and made many ignored suggestions to my state. As high level administration officials that now negotiate trade with China involving water movement through ballast systems, did not recognize virus and pathogens in natural waters for fish transport when they were involved as a senator in NY, despite knowing that our state university, helping formulate policy about bait fish was busy studying virus in water, with a grant, I doubt whether they will care about the dangers of ballast water or the carbon footprints associated with bring foreign products into our country in order to keep our large retail employers shelves filled with foreign manufactured products.
It should be noted in history despite the historic legislation passed by the House of representatives in 2008 to curtail ballast water introduction of virus and pathogens in American waters, ( that was rejected in the 2008 because of fear it would override individual state rights to stronger legislation), this Administration has failed to address ballast water as the economic recovery begins to increase the amount of shipping activity. Other than threw the week Coast Guard 2 decade purposed plan which mirrors another international organization made up of foreign countries, foreign sea captains, and foreign countries (IMO). It should also be noted that a military plan rather than legislation is subject to delay and change by the next commander and chief. To allow this to happen with insufficient protection, is the same way that the last president to address ballast water on a national level did prior to 2001, and it was then, ignoring national security and is now still ignoring national security.
Post new comment