Is that a busted taillight you got there, son?
Let me shout out "thanks" to Pipil DC and Christina for their comments on my last post.
Here's another quick article about a news story you have missed. It seems that in Arizona, the "Toughest Sheriff in America" has overstepped his bounds.
| The Hispanic Fanatic, who lives and blogs in Los Angeles, is a former resident of the Twin Cities. |
The man with this unimaginative nickname (one that seems self-generated) is Joe Arpaio, who is the law in Maricopa County - and don't you forget it. The sheriff has earned some attention for himself by going after illegal immigrants.
Arpaio had been working with the Department of Homeland Security to enforce federal immigration laws. Unfortunately, it seems that the sheriff wasn't just detaining illegals. He was allegedly rounding up Latinos in general. As such, Homeland Security is trying to limit his power to arrest people for the crime of being brown.
The sheriff denies that he's profiling. He says, "We do not go on street corners and grab people that look like they're from another country."
But the ACLU counters that "He's unconstitutionally acted to racially profile many persons in the community, persons who appear or are Latino" so that he can "appeal to his anti-immigration base."
Now, we all know (because I've heard it on talk radio) that the ACLU won't rest until illegal immigrants are given the keys to our houses and allowed to sleep with our wives. So maybe the sheriff is just being hounded by liberal atheist flag-burners?
But then there is the Goldwater Institute, a libertarian group that has denounced the sheriff's actions and said that his department "falls seriously short of fulfilling its mission." The Goldwater Institute, not exactly known for being a hangout for hippies, says that Arpaio has "diverted resources away from basic law-enforcement functions to highly publicized immigration sweeps, which are ineffective in policing illegal immigration."
It's at times like this that I'm grateful for old-school conservatives, who are still likely to get peeved when civil liberties are trampled. Social conservatives and neocons, of course, are different, in that they are first people to dismiss Constitutional rights as too cumbersome for our modern world. The contradiction between these definitions of "conservative" is far too complicated and depressing to address in this post.
Suffice to say, when you're in Arizona, keep an eye out for Sheriff Joe. He may be arresting people based on the color of their skin. He may be ignoring real crime and sidestepping the law. And he may be shirking his duty in order to get cozy with xenophobic nuts.
But he's a tough guy, you know.
| Support people-powered non-profit journalism! Volunteer, contribute news, or become a member to keep the Daily Planet in orbit. |


















Comments
Where does the Sheriff get his power?
I don't know what the Federal Government is going to do about the Good Sheriff. Sheriffs are Constitutional officers, not U. S. Constitution but State Constitution. Alaska is the only state that doesn't have the Constitutional officer of Sheriff.
The states created the Constitution which empowers the Federal government. Also, the Tenth Amendment reserves to the states respectively, or to the people, any powers the Constitution did not delegate to the United States, nor prohibit the states from exercising.
The office of sheriff is created by the Constitution of the Great State of Arizona. The sheriff is bound by the oath to uphold the Constitution of the state and answerable only to the people of the state NOT the Federal Government. The office of sheriff IS a part of the checks and balances of the United States of America. It is there to prevent the Federal Government from doing what it is trying to do today.
So what is the Federal Government going to do? Amend the Arizona State Constitution? I think not.
Why is it when people
Why is it when people rightfully go after abuse of power, even the left wants to invoke the false stereotype that atheists are out to create a fascist state?
I remember watching an interview with a Viet Nam vet who, while in prison camp had film footage shown to him of "flag burners" by his captors. The camp dictator said, "Look, even your own people do not support you".
The American soldier responded, "That is the difference. When people dissent in America, we don't have them killed or arrested for merely protesting".
Post new comment