American pundits' anti-Muslim hate speech predictably ends up costing lives
This is not to say that Islamophobia has not already cost a barrage of human lives. In addition to direct hate crimes committed against Muslims and Muslim-looking individuals in the US and Europe, hate speech against Muslims or at least the broad criticism of Muslims’ way of life is to blame, in my opinion, for the general public’s inaction toward the thousands of lost lives deemed “collateral damage” during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
So to me, the terrorist attacks that took place recently in Norway are not the first time that anti-Muslim hate speech has cost innocent lives. What’s different about it, however, is that this time it cost European lives as opposed to Arab or Afghani ones.
This calls into question the standards of some media outlets that exposed the hate mongering of Pam Geller and Robert Spencer after Europeans were killed, yet failed to do so as Non-Western lives were transgressed upon. Anti-Muslim pundits did not only influence the Norway attacker but also people at various levels of our society, including the FBI and political leaders who make decisions that can affect Muslim lives here and abroad.
It is time to stop giving air apace to people devoted to bashing Islam and Muslims. How it came about that pundits in America think it’s ok to call for a Jihad against Islam itself, a religion shared by over a fifth of the world’s population, is beyond me. Not even Saudi Arabian TV would ever host a Muslim extremist calling for the “defeat of Christianity”. So to me it is beyond excessive for a station viewed as “moderate” like Minnesota Public Radio to repeatedly host a hate monger like Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the dubious atheist who explicitly calls for all religions to join hands and “defeat Islam”.
This nonsense has been allowed to fester for too long. Extreme Islamophobic pundits need to be in the fringe radio frequencies where they belong, not on major stations and certainly not on MPR. This is an open invitation to all media outlets to think of what they’re propagating. They should ask themselves a simple question: would it be ok if the pundit they’re hosting is bashing another religion, like Buddhism or Judaism? Hate speech is hate speech, and it is bound to cost lives here and overseas unless exposed and stopped.
The Twin Cities Daily Planet is an edited news source produced by professional journalists working in collaboration with citizen journalists from the local community. We publish original reported news articles, articles republished from media partners, and some content (Free Speech Zone articles, reader-submitted blog entries, comments) that is moderated but not edited. Click here for a complete description of our editorial policies. Support people-powered non-profit journalism! Volunteer, contribute news, or become a member to keep the Daily Planet in orbit. |














We're people-powered journalism! Click on story links (below) to see more story information, and then email editor@tcdailyplanet.net if you want to report.
• 
Comments
Fight against Islamophobia
With tragic Norway's massacre, media are finally talking about Islamophobia especially out of Far Right movement. This could be the beginning of an international awareness regarding islamophobes both in Politics and Media. To continue the fight against Islamophobia, join the Mass Protest of Stop the War Coalition on October 8th in Trafalgar Square.
To get more information go to: http://antiwarassembly.org/
just to add, according to
just to add, according to her
Most muslims and non muslims DO NOT know about the core ideology of islam and life of prophet mohammed and hence reflexively try to defend to it as well meaning individuals.
You have to listen to Ayaan
You have to listen to Ayaan hirsi ali without a pre judiced mind to understand her.
I think she is an intellectual and an extremely important voice who needs to heard More and not less.
Her point is that not all relgions and ideologies are equal. Just like we have a freedom of practising religion, we have freedoms of criticizing religions and that is what she does. Islam as an ideology (and not muslims) should not get a pass at this time in history and should be subject to critical reflection and criticism.
She makes a distinction between islam as an ideology and muslims who might or might not practice it. According to her muslms and specially muslim women are a victim of this ideology.
American pundits' anti-Muslim hate speech
Ayaan Hirsi Ali makes sweeping egregious generalizations about Islam and posits them as truth for all Muslims. Her claims are not only irresponsible but potentially dangerous for Muslims throughout the world.
Ayaan was forced to resign as a digraced Dutch MP and announced her departure for the US. She has proven to be a rampant opportunist who succesfully seduced soft-in-the-head Dutch liberals with lies and divisive posturing (as this video shows) before defecating on them and joining her right-wing, neo-liberal compatriots in the US, the American Enterprise Institute (AEI). They exploited her predicament to forward their Neocon anti-Islamic/war agenda. In turn she has to carry water for them.
Post new comment