Monday, Jul 6, 2009

workaround

workaround

SMTWTFS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The Minnesota Health Plan

by Erica Mauter • I think we can all agree that our health care system is f’ed up. There are so many parts to it that just do not work and it gets more and more expensive to deliver arguably equal value.

fresh.mn is a cityblog for and about life in the Twin Cities, published by Erica Mauter. Contact erica@fresh.mn

I know when I think about it, it just seems hopeless. The scope of needed change is so far-reaching. There are service providers, insurance companies, corporations, and don’t even get me started on the pharmaceutical industry and the cost of drugs.

But then, Massachusetts has already tried something. So when I read that there’s a plan for health care reform in Minnesota, I was pretty frickin’ excited, even though it kind of boggles my mind that there even is a plan in the first place. I mean, they’re proposing it could be implemented within a couple years!

Some say that providing good, affordable health-care coverage requires additional state revenue expenditures to subsidize the cost. But with the state’s $5 billion-plus deficit, it’s hard to see how that can happen. As it is, there will be desperate fights to maintain existing health care spending. Any improvements, the reasoning goes, must wait until the economy improves.

That’s where the Minnesota Health Plan comes in. Rather than competing for vanishing general revenue, this proposal (introduced last year as SF 2324 and HF 2522, with more than 50 co-sponsors) would achieve affordable, universal coverage by restructuring the overall financing of health care. A unified public plan for all Minnesota residents would be created with standardized comprehensive benefits, no copays or deductibles, full choice of providers, and financed mostly by a sliding-scale premium, according to household income. It would reduce and hold down overall spending by eliminating the huge administrative waste of our current multi-insurance system, create a common-sense distribution of expensive equipment and facilities, negotiate for reduced drug prices, hold down excessive fees for acute care, and emphasize primary and preventive care. (More information is here.)


Plus, one of the bill’s authors is Sen. John Marty, my favorite straight guy/LGBT ally in the state legislature.

That MinnPost article is definitely pretty broad and completely lacking in real details. mnhealthplan.org’s FAQ is also somewhat lacking in details, but does speak to a lot of the most common questions about insurance, the government’s role, socialized medicine, consumer choice, undocumented immigrants, taxes, etc.

I only got so far through the text of the bill introduced in the state legislature last year (also available at mnhealthplan.org), so I’m still not 100% clear on how the money would flow. I’m wondering what kind of premiums (which would be sliding-scale based on income) we’d all have to pay to actually cover the cost of all services provided. I’m also thinking that the insurance industry is so bloated that I have no real clue what the actual cost of health care really is, which is a problem in and of itself.

But it appears there’s hope. There’s a workable plan. I’d love to see our government grow a pair and try something. Be a leader in this country.

Comments

Post new comment

The Twin Cities Daily Planet encourages readers to submit comments voicing their views in a constructive and civil fashion. The editors reserve the right to edit comments for length and clarity, and we may decline to publish comments that advertise services or goods, take an intemperate tone, or that contain potentially libelous allegations.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

workaround

Stories We're Working On

In progress

These are some of the stories we are working on. We invite and encourage you to contribute to these stories, or to suggest other stories that you would like to see covered.

REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK | North Minneapolis We’ll tell you what the judge decides on the flurry of lawsuits around last winter’s Jordan Area Community Council controversy as soon as the decision is made (probably the week of July 6). What do you think about what’s been going on at JACC, in Jordan, and around the Northside? Tell us what you know – and what you think we should be covering.

REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK | Background checks bar park volunteers
Minneapolis parks have recently tightened enforcement of rules about background checks for volunteers. But does the “systemic bias of the criminal justice system” mean that many African American males will be barred from serving as volunteers? We want to hear your ideas.

REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK | Hmong Freedom Celebration and Sports Tournament Coming up this weekend! We’re looking for community input about the sports tournament, your experiences at the tournament, how it has changed over the years, what the gathering of Hmong from around the country and around the world means, and any other thoughts you might have about the weekend.

MORE »

MUSIC | Black Blondie and Foxy Tann knock 'em dead at the Uptown Pride Block Party

The Uptown Pride Block Party on June 26 was an LGBT Pride Week affair, but you didn’t need to be lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender to get with it. For that matter, you didn’t have to have a dime in your pocket. All you had to bring was the willingness to enjoy a damned good time. MORE »

We get comments

Recent comments

MOVIES | Johnny Depp and Christian Bale in Public Enemies: Michael Mann doing what he does best: Austin Kennedy – I don’t mind independent pictures using HD video ‘cause they don’t have enough money for film, but when a major studio is making a multi-million dollar picture (and a period piece at that), shoot the friggin’ thing on film. No excuse! MORE »