Saturday, Feb 11, 2012
workaround

Donate Now tile

User login

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.




workaround



Triangle Park Creative

Immigration law separates Minnesota family

Martin and his grandfather on the farm in Wisconsin (Photos courtesy of Naomi Hagen)

July 09, 2009
Martin is not quite five years old, but he's a veteran of trans-Atlantic cell phone calls. He and his father are separated by immigration rules and an ocean, so photos and phone calls are Martin's main connection with the man who once held him close.

Martin's parents come from two different continents. Mom Naomi Hagen grew up in farm country in central Wisconsin. Her mother and step-dad still live on a farm there. Naomi moved to Minnesota, got a bachelor's degree in education, and is "close" to completing a master's degree in Organizational Leadership from Bethel College. She has a teacher's license, and has worked for nonprofits and for a consulting firm.

Nana Opoku Asare had been successful in Ghana, working in information technology and computer systems, but he wanted more out of life. When he had the chance to move to New Jersey and work with his uncle there, he took it.


Immigration reform and family reunification

Energy of a Nation Information on immigration from Advocates for Human Rights

Immigration Policy: Family Reunification from the League of Women Voters

Minneapolis assembly sends message to Obama on immigration reform (TC Daily Planet)

No Turning Back: Rep. Luis Gutierrez Is Making Immigration Reform a Personal Cause (Washington Post)

Immigrant Law Center of Minnesota Legal assistance in Minnesota

In a thoroughly modern manner, Naomi and Nana met through the internet. They got to know each other over a period of months, and finally decided to meet in person. After that, their courtship proceeded along traditional lines – dating, meeting each other's families, an engagement. Finally, their wedding day arrived. On July 18, 2003, they became husband and wife in the same small Wisconsin Lutheran church where Naomi's grandparents had been married.

Right after the wedding, they filed an application for Nana Opoku Asare to become a permanent legal resident of the United States. They didn't think there would be any problem. They filled out the paperwork themselves, figuring they didn't need a lawyer. They had heard that the spouse of a U.S. citizen could become a legal resident without much delay.

Immigration took a year to process the papers, said Naomi, and then sent more forms to the couple. Some of the forms asked for more information, and there was the standard immigration medical exam – and lots of fees. At some point, the case was transferred to an office in Kansas.

As the paperwork continued, Naomi became pregnant, and they looked forward to the birth of their baby. Martin was born in May of 2005.

The bad news came soon after – Nana Opoku Asare would have to return to Ghana to adjust his immigration status. Because he did not have a current visa, he was not eligible to adjust his immigration status inside the United States. Naomi remembers an ominous phone conversation with the immigration office: "Someone said on the phone that he could be sent back for seven years, but because you're married and have a child, they could overrule that."

In October, 2005, Nana Opoku Asare went back to Ghana, as the immigration officers told him to do. In an email message, he tells what happened next: "After the United States immigration center took thousands of dollars of our money for processing fees, they asked me to return to Ghana for my immigrant visa interview. I came to Ghana literally without much money. And to make matter worse i was refused the visa. The judgment letter they gave me said I could file for an appeal which also costed me about $700. Another $545 for waiver fee. I patiently waited for two years for the embassy to tell me that my application is being denied."

"We thought it would be a few months, we would complete the paperwork, and he would return," Naomi says. "Now, nearly four years and three filings later, he is still 'stuck' in Ghana, and we have not seen him since then."

From Ghana and from Minnesota, Naomi and Nana have worked at the immigration paperwork, and have tried to deal with their involuntary separation.

"Martin has been separated from his daddy since October 24, 2005 - when he was only five months old," Naomi explains. "We talk to him almost every day via phone, internet, email, texting, and other media.

"It has been a difficult journey since he's been gone on so many levels - emotionally, physically, financially ... we have had a good friend and family support system, but the government has not supported us. We had Jim Ramstad's office look into things for us - just to find where in the immigration wasteland our case had gone. They 'found it on a shelf' (the exact words of the Immigration advocate) and looked into it. However, they could do nothing to help us and eventually learned that our appeal to have our husband/father returned was once again denied due to 'lack of hardship' on my end."

For Martin and his parents, the hardship is real. "If only Martin could tell you," Naomi says. "He just knows he hasn't seen his father since before he can remember. It's hard - he knows he's not like other kids."

In theory, Naomi and Martin could move to Ghana. Naomi and Nana have talked about the possibility, but so far have decided against it. The expense is one concern. When Nana had to leave so soon after Martin was born, the family finances were severely strained. Then came more fees for more immigration filings. And now, in the midst of the recession, Naomi has been laid off.

So the family waits. They visit the Wisconsin grandparents, and Naomi teaches Martin about African culture. For a year and a half, his babysitter was "an African grandma," she says. "Martin loves African culture, food, clothes - he wants to wear the African clothes to church every Sunday. … He's both African and farm country."

Speaking on the cell phone from Ghana, Nana Opoku says, "It's so, so, so painful -- I cry about it every day, being apart from Martin and apart from Naomi as well.

"I love America. I just wish they could bring families back together, especially families like mine, especially we who have clean records and are good guys out there."

In June, Naomi attended her first immigration rally, bringing Martin with her. She had never been an activist, but now she is committed to working for change.

The rally was "really cool," according to Naomi, "because it was like a thousand people here who care. They care about me.

"I feel so differently about looking at the immigrants around me now. Like I don't know your story but I'm sure it's tough."

"Immigration reform is much needed," she wrote in an email. "In our case, it is personally urgent as my little boy grows without his daddy - and a daddy who loves him and wants to be here. My husband is a good and caring man who just wants to experience what every other immigrant dreams of - the American dream. For us, it has become the nightmare of separation, and not knowing who can come beside us to reunite our little family."

Mary Turck is the editor of the TC Daily Planet.

Mary Turck's picture
Mary Turck

Mary Turck is the editor of the TC Daily Planet.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Same problem here...

She could have filed statements using a psychiatrist. One of my friends was able to get her husband back home in 2 weeks because they presented enough information that it would cause mental harm and anguish to the kids. I have the same problem, but due to lack of money we haven't filed. We need reform, I need my partner to not only work but be there for me as well. Without reform, I'm afraid I will be destitute and struggling to get by everyday with our 3 children.

Understand the Process

Victims, victims, victims. The Daily Planet at times seems to be a constant flow of victimology. This is one side of the story from people in the middle of the immigration process. A clue is he had "no current visa". They had no lawyer involved and they did little research into the process. They did not do their homework. Then you have Jennifer above suggesting that you game the system by claiming mental harm and anguish. No wonder immigration is skeptical of many applications. Poor planning. No valid visa. What do you expect? I migrated to this country after I met my future husband in my native Brazil. We researched the process, got the advice of an immigration lawyer and we were completely honest with everyone. It took a while, but we did it and spent a lot less money than family in the article above. Sometimes people can be victims of their own actions.

please reunite them....

This is what the goverment needs to do to help families.Martin is a true copy of his dad, they look so much alike.Naomi, is a wonderful mother who needs her hansband by her side to support their family.Nana is hard working, caring and a good person with a beautiful heart.Please don't take their joy away and re-unite their family.They need each other.Martin, misses his father and he does too, what about Naomi, every woman needs a man, please do something about this case before severe mental damage happens to this family.I won't stop praying till your reunion happens.I feel your pain. a worried supporter.

spouse can file in US

There is normally no requirement for the foreign spouse of an American citizen to move back to the home country to file for a Green Card. If the spouse for example slightly overstaid the old visa and, thereby, made him- or herself deportable, then the marriage with the citizen is "healing" that visa deficiency. The only thing to proof is the authenticity of the marriage. A baby is normally considered proof enough that the marriage is no sham. By returning to the homeland, the spouse has done a mistake, and a lawyer or immigration rights center would have advised better than the USCIS - which brings me to the main point: Of all American bureacracies, the USCIS seems to be the most inept and error-prone. This is not so surprising, because they screw up the lives of non-citizens and only the occassional American victim, as here. If the American people would know how what injustice and incompetency is delivered in their name, they would clean that house thouroughly. A foreign spouse of an American citizen

You forgot to mention

You forgot to mention contemptuous, unlawful, and corrupt.

Do you know the other side

I feel for them however many United States Citizens are victims of desperate aliens seeking marriage to a USC and having anchor babies to ensure their status in the United States. Enforcement of laws has to begin somewhere. I am guilty of ingnorance too, much like this family who wish to be together and united.

Immigration: myth & reality

While warm and fuzzy, this "human interest" story has all the elements of love and affection which are absolutely honest, true and to be admired. HOWEVER, your story doesn't even attempt to explain "what went wrong" other than to note "When (Nana) had the chance to move to New Jersey and work with his uncle there he took it". Correctly, it should have included what likely happened - that Nana entered the U.S. either with forged papers, a phony visa, or entered the U.S. unlawfully by sneaking across the northern or southern border and thereafter, "human nature took its course" . While the Rule of Law should not be absolute, it is essential and while every case stands on its own merits, law cannot be totally set aside. Naively, like many others, lay people (including journalists) frequently think they know best and there is no shortage of friends and family who rely on old myths about "marry a U.S. citizen and it's automatic". That is why immigration law is a niche profession. Unfortunately, the law did not provide for Nana to adjust his status to Permanent Resident while in the U.S. and when he departed, he subjected himself to a 10 year bar subject to obtaining a "hardship waiver" based on more than missing each other, or he can't earn enough money in his native Ghana to support his midwest family.

What kinds of objections are allowable in immigration arguments?

The writer's comment is a lawyer's argument: it is not a legislator's nor is it a citizen's. What's at issue for the latter two is not just the black letter law but the form the law should take. Even so, the comment is odd because while it appeals to the "rule of law," it also concedes that the rule ought not to be without exception. There is no further guidance here about what exceptions should be considered. Finally, before a commentator impugns the credentials of a "journalist" (the quotation marks are meant to reflect the writer's dismissal of people who write to inform the public), he really ought to have checked on the credentials of the "journalist." Failure to do so sometimes earns egg on the face. This is one such occasion.

Why he couldn't be able to adjust status here in the US?

There is much more to the storey, trust me, which either was no disclosed by the editor or by the people involved itself because US immigration laws do allow an illegal to adjust his/her status in the US if- (1) s/he is an immediate relative of a US citizen on a visa petition, which this person was/is; (2) if s/he was entered into the US with inspection...with a visa/Visa Waiver Privilege, which is not known in this case. If husband in this case entered into the US without a visa or under phony documents/name then obviously he couldn't able to adjust his status in the US even if he has had US citizen-spouse and US born child. Same goes to the situation if he entered on fiance-visa (K-1 visa) but didn't marry within 90 days of entering into the US. However, if he did come into the US with a visa or being inspected and became illegal later on then he should have been able to adjust his status in the US by virtue of being married to a US citizen because immigration laws automatically forgive illegal status and illegal working if the person is an immediate relative of a US citizen. Therefore, when article states-"he has no current visa", it doesn't say anything. There are more to the story. Further, immigration laws don't allow anymore (since 1996) to file a waiver on the ground of having children who are either LPR or US, instead parents or spouse must be the one. Thus, he cannot seek a waiver based on his son but on his wife. Also, there must be an extreme hardship to his wife if a visa is not granted to him which doesn't seem to be the case here...That's why his waiver and appeal got denied. A separation and financial hardship don't count under the criteria of extreme hardship. That's why his application for waiver got denied rightfully. Govt is following and implementing the laws in the book. He is now barred for another 10 years to enter into the US. I know these people and might be along with their attorney are trying to get govt attention to have their case approved by publishing an article like this but this guy's case got denied rightfully. He must have entered into the US without inspected or under phony name/document. Or didn't marry within 90 days if he did enter into the US on K-1 visa. Please don't look this case as a pro-immigrants approach instead look it if law was applied correctly or not. If you have a problem with a law itself then you need to take the matter to your congresspeople and President than USCIS/Courts.

This Story is Emotion and Little Fact

This story is written jerk the emotions around and a plea for fairness. It is also not complete and transparent. Shame on you for writing a story to manipulate people's "feelings" without telling the complete story.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <img> <span> <div>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use [google_ad:ad_slot] to display Google Admanager ads within your content.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
workaround

Free Speech Zone

The Free Speech Zone offers a space for contributions from readers, without editing by the TC Daily Planet. This is an open forum for articles that otherwise might not find a place for publication, including news articles, opinion columns, and announcements. The opinions expressed in the Free Speech Zone and Neighborhood Notes, as well as the opinions of bloggers, are their own and not necessarily the opinion of the TC Daily Planet.

Click here to see a display of Twin Cities problem reports, from potholes to neighborhood eyesores. Click here to report a problem. Have you used SeeClickFix? Have you gotten any response from city officials? Let us know - email info@tcdailyplanet.net