Wednesday, Mar 17, 2010
workaround

User login

Connect
Sign in using Facebook
«  
  »
S M T W T F S
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 

workaround
view counter
view counter
view counter
view counter

REPORTER'S NOTEBOOK | Background checks bar parks volunteers

Share
June 30, 2009
Minneapolis parks have recently tightened enforcement of rules about background checks for volunteers. But does the "systemic bias of the criminal justice system" mean that many African American males will be barred from serving as volunteers?

For full story, go to Do backgrond checks unfairly weed out some volunteers?


The Minneapolis Park Board policy calls for background checks for workers and volunteers. The policy is not new, writes a community resident in the Powderhorn Park Forum, but enforcement has become more strict—and that has meant the loss of some staff and volunteers who have been at the park for years.

Pro strict enforcement: Criminal background checks can screen out people who could be dangerous to the children of the community.

Anti strict enforcement: Criminal background checks disproportionately screen out people of color, "excluding people who have struggled, had bad experiences or overcome challenges ... the very people most able to connect with struggling youth."

"No one doubts the need for a careful and thorough background check for all park staff and volunteers. Obviously, there are categories of offences for which no exceptions should ever be considered. But, in light of the systemic racial bias in our criminal justice system, how we enforce a policy based solely on data from that system needs careful evaluation."

The Park Board Commissioners will be holding their monthly meeting at Powderhorn Park on Wednesday, July 1, 2009 from 5:00-8:00 p.m. with opportunities for public input at 5:00 p.m.

What do you think? Send us your comments, or contact Anna Pratt at annaprattjournalist@gmail.com

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Volunteer Coordinator

It's about risk management and liability. Imagine some volunteer working with the Park and Rec does something unspeakable to a child or vulnerable adult - it's then discovered that this is part of a pattern - they've done this before, in a similar situation and were caught. What do the parents do in our sue-happy society (after filing criminal charges against the perp)? Find a lawyer and sue the Park and Rec Dept and/or City (whoever they can hold liable) for allowing the individual to volunteer with them, despite the fact they have a procedure in place to filter out risky individuals. It's due diligence to figure out what these high risk positions are and what the appropriate requirements should be. Example here is: http://www.startribune.com/40327012.html?page=1&c=y "Nobody with the district ran a criminal check on Gregory B. Washington before he was hired. District policy requires contractors to complete background checks on their employees and the district reserves the right to review individual employees records." Now how does it sound?

Common Sense

Should we wait until someone with a criminal background does something unspeakable before we decide to play by the rules? If you decide to engage in criminal behavior, there is a price to pay. You have just put yourself into a high risk catagory. Citizens do not want to take that risk. I am shocked that there was not more strict enforcement before now.

update? details?

I realize this may have already been decided a couple of days ago. But if it is still under consideration, would you elaborate on what kind of background check we are talking about? In other words, are people with misdemeanor crimes against property being disqualified the same as people with felony crimes against people? THAT wouldn't make sense. Without that context, this article is not very informative.

update

i agree with you -- pitbull friend -- my update is definitely going to include that context. thanks for your response and stay tuned.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <img> <span> <div>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

view counter
workaround

Assignment Desk

view counter

Free Speech Zone

The Free Speech Zone offers a space for contributions from readers, without editing by the TC Daily Planet. This is an open forum for articles that otherwise might not find a place for publication, including news articles, opinion columns, and announcements.

Have you used SeeClickFix? Have you gotten any response from city officials? Let us know - email info@tcdailyplanet.net

Click below to report a problem, or to see more detailed reports from your zip code, city or neighborhood. Minneapolis 311 and the St. Paul mayor's office in St. Paul monitor SeeClickFix.

Minneapolis
St. Paul
Other