Friday, Feb 10, 2012
workaround

Donate Now tile

User login

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.




workaround



Triangle Park Creative

Supreme court race to the finish

October 26, 2008
In a race that has recently heated up, Supreme Court Justice Lorie Skjerven Gildea and Fourth District Court Judge Deborah Hedlund are battling for the Associate Justice seat on the Minnesota Supreme Court held by Gildea since her appointment by Governor Tim Pawlenty in January 2006. Hedlund has been a trial judge in Minneapolis since 1980.



Hedlund, Muslims and controversy
Hedlund made the news recently over an e-mail that expressed anti-Muslim sentiments. She says she did not read all of the e-mail, which was sent to her and others from a campaign-sign vendor.

According to Hedlund, she clicked onto the e-mail and started talking about sign price negotiations, and then mistakenly hit “reply all.” Some readers thought Hedlund’s reply to the sign vendor was an agreement about the anti-Muslim statements.

“I’ll never forward another email in my life,” exclaimed Hedlund.

For details on the e-mail controversy, see Minnesota judicial races: Evangelical Supreme Court candidate tells anti-Muslim correspondent ‘We speak the same language’

Hedlund thinks that voters should know more than they do about judges up for election, but she and Gildea both say politics should have no role in judicial campaigns.

For Hedlund, that stance wobbled a bit when she wondered if Gildea’s husband, Andy, who is the Executive Assistant to Minority Leader –GOP Caucus, might affect her balance of the law.

Gildea points to the fact she is the only candidate who has been hired by leaders from three different political parties. Former Governor Jesse Ventura of the Independent Party appointed her to the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission, Republican Governor Tim Pawlenty appointed her to both the trial bench and the Supreme Court and Senator Amy Klobuchar, a Democrat, hired Gildea to prosecute white-collar criminals and criminals who abused vulnerable adults when she was Hennepin County Attorney.

“I thought we’d gone past the time when something a woman’s husband does is used against her,” responded Gildea.

Experience is the main reason Hedlund thinks that she is the best candidate for Supreme Court. She has been elected five times by the public, has tried at least 21 murder cases and has 28 years of trial court experience as opposed to Gidea’s four months. Hedlund says her trial experience is important because most of the cases the Supreme Court reviews are criminal.



The Supreme Court decides which of the 700 or so cases that come before them, need review. Then the justices prepare for oral arguments, which entails many days spent on research and writing opinion.

The Supreme Court interprets the law and constitution on appeals from trial court decisions. Trial courts hear criminal and civil cases. Sometimes trials involve a judge and jury and sometimes the judge alone decides. In the Supreme Court, decisions are made collectively by all of the judges. They then issue decisions and written opinions.

Gildea counters that the “length of trial experience might be relevant if we were running for a job on the trial court, but we’re not. We’re running for a job on the Supreme Court and I have almost three years of experience doing that job and my opponent has zero.”

“I take great pride in the opinions that I have had the privilege to write for the Supreme Court. I enjoy digging down and really exploring the issues of a case and then putting forth an opinion that is readable, logical and will stand the test of time,” said Gildea

Hedlund has handled as many as 500 to 800 civil cases a year. “I loved it –but I will say that I have very experienced law clerks,” she said.

Endorsements for Gildea include three former chief justices and three former associate justices, eight past State Bar Association presidents, 115 appellate lawyers, and three former Hennepin County judges, to name a few.

Joining the race late, Hedlund has a shorter list of endorsements. Hedlund expressed concern that perhaps those whom endorsed Gildea did not have a chance to change their minds.

“Endorsement is not an irrevocable act. Only one person has asked to be removed from my support list since my opponent entered the race. Supporters are still coming on board, including three of Judge Hedlund’s former colleagues,” said Gildea, “People who know what it takes to be a good Minnesota Supreme Court Justice are supporting me in this race.”

Both candidates have undergraduate degrees in political science. Hedlund earned her law degree from the University of Minnesota in 1972 and Gildea earned hers from Georgetown Law Center in 1986.

Both candidates have impressive resumes that can be viewed in full at the Minnesota Lawyer website, which also includes information about other candidates running for judicial offices. The Minnesota Lawyer blog also posted videos from both candidates.


Justice Gildea's campaign web site has more information.


Judge Hedlund's campaign web site has more information.

Before attending law school, Hedlund taught English at an inner-city high school in Kansas City, Missouri and for the past 11 years, has been an adjunct professor of criminal law, teaching one night a week at Northwestern College in St. Paul. In her free time, she is a competitive tennis player, loves to ski and garden.

While a lawyer for the University of Minnesota, Gildea was instrumental in the addition of women’s ice hockey teams there and in Duluth. She is an avid Gopher women’s sport fan to this day. “Some might say an unreasonable Gopher fan,” laughs Gildea. She is an equestrian and also a drummer, just like everyone else in her family.

Active involvement in the area of advancement for women is common in both candidates. Gildea currently serves on the Supreme Court Gender Fairness Implementation Committee, has served on the Minnesota’s YWCA Advisory Board from the summer of 2000 until the summer of 2003, is involved in the American Legion Auxiliary Girls State program, which teaches high school seniors how government and the political process work on national and local levels.

“Today at the court room, I spoke to a government class from Kasson-Mantorville, and met with the Women Law Student Association over lunch,” said Gildea.

Hedlund is involved as a resource and mentor for Girls in Action, a North Community High School program aimed at providing encouragement, instilling confidence and helping set personal goals. She has been part of both minority and gender task forces.

“Something I’ve enjoyed lately is being invited to foreign countries to speak on human rights, especially the rights of women,” said Hedlund. She was recently in India where she spoke about how dowries can be lethal to new brides, among other things.

Hedlund is a strong supporter of using volunteers in the correction system and recruits them actively. She started a program called adopt-a-defendant, where mentors are provided for predominantly non-violent offenders to help them follow through with probation. “Someone outside the system, someone who really cares – makes a big difference,” said Hedlund of volunteers. “It’s one of the places where you can plug hope back in.”

Mary Schoen lives in White Bear Lake with her husband and her muse, Rudy, a Rat Terrier with Holstein markings. E-mail pmschoen@usfamily.net).

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The judiciary’s answer to

The judiciary's answer to Michele Bachmann? I'm glad Hedlund wants Minnesotans to know more about judges. Readers might be interested to know that last week she drew some attention for forwarding to others an anti-Muslim email she received. She was quoted recently as saying that what she knows about the Presidential candidates would fill a thimble. She also is the judge who, in the 1990's, granted an injunction that blocked domestic partners benefits for Minneapolis city employees from going into effect.

Hedlund v. Gildea

Look closely at this one peeps. I'm an ardent Dem and lefty, but this is one race in which I'll be voting for Gildea, the candidate with the Republican husband. I have no use for Gov. Pawlenty-of-nothin', but for the record, his judicial appointments have actually been pretty good. I suggest you ask around, talk to people in the court system about Hedlund. It's no accident that she has a short(er) list of endorsements. The League of Pissed Off Voters originally endorsed Hedlund, (didn't do their homework on that one) but were so swamped with objections from people in the know that they decided to rescind the endorsement. In this race, Hedlund is simply not the right choice.

Get ALL the facts BEFORE you judge

Hedlund knows the law and follows it. Now, if that makes her unpopular, then doing her job well is what makes her unpopular. Check out the debate on Mpls Mirror that her opponent failed to show up for. Check out Hedlund’s website to see that those who are judging her so harshly are doing so prematurely and without facts to base those judgements on. BUT ABOVE ALL – FIND OUT THE FACTS BEFORE YOU JUDGE (as she does in her court room – I can personally attest to that) – AND find them out for yourself – not second OR third hand through the rumor mill. P.S. Keeping the elitists in power is what Gildea stands for – check that out.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <img> <span> <div>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use [google_ad:ad_slot] to display Google Admanager ads within your content.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
workaround

Free Speech Zone

The Free Speech Zone offers a space for contributions from readers, without editing by the TC Daily Planet. This is an open forum for articles that otherwise might not find a place for publication, including news articles, opinion columns, and announcements. The opinions expressed in the Free Speech Zone and Neighborhood Notes, as well as the opinions of bloggers, are their own and not necessarily the opinion of the TC Daily Planet.

Click here to see a display of Twin Cities problem reports, from potholes to neighborhood eyesores. Click here to report a problem. Have you used SeeClickFix? Have you gotten any response from city officials? Let us know - email info@tcdailyplanet.net