Sunday, Nov 8, 2009
workaround

User login

S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
 
 
 

workaround
view counter
view counter
view counter

St. Thomas drops the curtain: Eliminates theater department, slates Foley Theater for destruction

A collage of student performers on a theater department bulletin board. Below: The Foley Theater.

October 09, 2008
In recent weeks, the University of St. Thomas has announced that it will both close its 80-year-old Department of Theater and tear down the Foley Theater, an on-campus venue that hosted its first production in 1915. The administration is calling this a strategic decision to free resources for other programs with greater student interest, but students and faculty in the department are criticizing what they see as the university’s abandonment of an essential art.

Since 1971, St. Thomas’s theater program has been a joint department shared with the College of St. Catherine. In July, St. Thomas sent letters to its students with declared majors or minors in theater, notifying the students that while the joint department would be dissolved, the students would be allowed to complete their degree programs. The rest of the university community learned of the decision through a September 15 article in the Bulletin, the university’s official news source. The Bulletin article describes a lengthy review process that wound its way through three different academic committees before a final decision was made by Marisa Kelly, dean of St. Thomas’s College of Arts and Sciences, and Alan Silva, dean of arts and sciences at St. Catherine.

A timeline of theater at St. Thomas
• 1885: The Lyceum is founded as a literary club that also produces dramatic performances.
• 1908: St. Thomas offers its first course in theater: “Advanced Studies in Oratory and Drama.”
• 1915: A new auditorium built as an extension to the St. Thomas Armory hosts its first theatrical production, My Friend From India.
• 1928: The Speech and Theater Department is officially inaugurated.
• 1929: Channing Pollock’s The Fool is the first St. Thomas production in which female students from St. Catherine are allowed to appear.
• 1932: Robert Breen, a young student, appears in the title role of Hamlet. Breen left St. Thomas the following year; he would ultimately go on to found his own company and later head the American National Theatre and Academy.
• 1958: The Armory auditorium, converted into a dedicated theater and rechristened the Foley Theater, opens with a production of Aristophanes’s The Birds.
• 1971: The theater departments of St. Thomas and St. Catherine combine.
• 2008: St. Thomas announces that the joint department will be dissolved, with no plans for a freestanding department at St. Thomas. The Foley Theater is slated for destruction.

Sources: University of St. Thomas, Minnesota Theatre by Frank M. Whiting (Pogo Press, 1988)

“We just didn’t feel that there was the critical mass of student interest to be able to maintain the quality of the program going forward,” says Kelly. “We thought that [by making this decision] we could enhance our other programs, and create opportunities for students to be involved in theater in other ways.” Kelly emphasizes that while the formal department is being dissolved, St. Thomas hopes to continue its longstanding partnership with St. Catherine. “Students here would be able to participate in production opportunities at St. Kate’s, and their students would be able to participate in our music programs.” Kelly notes, however, that the exact details of any future partnership cannot be known until St. Catherine, which has recently announced its decision to move from college to university status, works out the particulars of its new organizational structure.

Kelly says that the decision to tear down the Foley Theater, which opened as a gymnasium/auditorium in 1914 and was converted to a dedicated theater space in 1958, was unrelated to the decision to eliminate the theater department. “The Foley Theater is very old,” she says. “It is not handicapped-accessible, and making it accessible would be hugely expensive. We’ve been planning for a few years to put on that footprint what will potentially be part of a new student center and athletic facility; we’d been planning to move all the theatrical productions over to St. Kate’s, which has a black-box theater and the O’Shaughnessy.”

Amelia Kritzer, the theater department’s only full-time faculty member, will retain her tenured position at St. Thomas but will be reassigned to a different department. “I think it’s a mistake,” says Kritzer about the university’s decision to eliminate the theater department. “St. Thomas and St. Kate’s will be much poorer for this decision. There are many other faculty members who agree with me.”

Students involved in theater are dismayed at their program’s impending dissolution. “I think that it was a poor decision,” says Molly O’Gara, a junior majoring in theater and English. “If you’re going to offer a liberal arts education, you need to offer the arts. [St. Thomas is] ignoring a major part of the human experience.”

O’Gara and two other students recently met with Kelly to talk about the transition. While Kelly describes students as being “reasonably happy” with the university’s future plans for offering students performance opportunities, O’Gara says she was “a little disheartened by the fact that there wasn’t an apology offered. There were reasons given, but [Kelly] said that we shouldn’t be upset because we’ll still be able to complete our major. The administration doesn’t understand the emotional impact this has had on the department and its students.”

“I’m disappointed myself,” says Kelly, “in that we want to be able to offer the broadest range of programs that we can. But the reality is that you have to make strategic decisions and you have to look at student interest.” There are currently 11 St. Thomas undergraduates who have declared majors in theater; Kelly describes this as a relatively high number in the context of recent years. “While it’s been a quality program, that was going to be much more difficult to do. I think that when we work through all this transition, the experience for students will be, if not equivalent, perhaps enhanced in some ways.” Kelly says there is significant faculty interest in establishing an independent program in film production, which to date has been taught in the theater department.

Kritzer says that the administration did allow her the opportunity to make her case for retaining the department. “My primary argument has to do with theater in a liberal arts institution,” she says. “Theater contributes in a vital way to the liberal arts. It gives students opportunities for personal development. For those students and for those who come to see the shows, it’s a unique opportunity for experiencing the lives of other people. Without those opportunities, education will suffer.”

The remaining theater majors have resolved to work to raise awareness of theater on campus. “We’ve got the impression that we can’t really do anything to reverse the decision” to eliminate the theater department, says O’Gara, “so we’re trying to step forward through the Theater Club. We’re getting a lot of publicity out about the department and the club and the things we can do. We’re still creative people, who St. Thomas can’t just get rid of.”

Jay Gabler is the Daily Planet’s arts editor.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Foley folly

I never trod the boards in Foley Theater (I did play banjo on the steps), but I have strong, pleasant memories of attending productions there: the fine directorial work of E. Arnold Spencer, who played villains in melodramas at the Stagecoach Theatre in Shakopee; department head John Lee Doll announcing on the evening of Nov. 22, 1963, that the show ("The Importance of Being Earnest") would go on; seeing my own daughter in a lead role in "Steel Magnolias" 35 years after I graduated. I think it's short-sighted to trash the tradition of Foley Theater, but I'm an old sentimentalist. I can't resist asking sarcastically, what will be the final performance? A one-man show by Archbishop Desmond Tutu?

Tragic mistake

It's a tragic mistake. One that will come back and bite St. Thomas University sure as the sun comes up. You can not call yourself a real university without at least some kind of presence in the arts. Attendance is going fall off as prospective students start looking at the place as some kind of second rate community college. It's really a shame about the St. Thomas University theatre students who are being gutted by the ass backward maneuver. Dwight Hobbes Minneapolis

Dissappointment by St. Thomas' choice

As a graduate of St. Kate's married to a St. Thomas graduate and masters graduate, I am deeply dissappointed to see St.Thomas step away from the degree of Bachelor of Arts they pass out. To choose to spend money on other areas which I see as a captialist choice, not to benefit the community of St.Thomas nor to benefit the students. Theater, like music, like visual art, will never make money for the colleges, But like St. Kate's, St. Thomas is lessening the college experience for all the students by weakening the community and lessening the degrees they pass out by removing one of the Arts in the bachelor of arts degree. St. Kate's has allowed to matriculate the music department to become a shadow of what the music department was. But in the world where nothing is valued unless it came make money by either students attending or graduates who can GIVE money to their alma mater, the arts will never create those kind of people. But how much smaller and lesser is the college community, the Twin Cites arts community, and ultimately the degrees St. Thomas gives out on this decision. It deeply saddens me to see this. As a parent of four children, this decision will also affect on my choice for college for them. It will weigh against St. Thomas. How sad.

Money Isn't Everything

I am a sophomore at UST, and while I am not a declared theater major or minor I am currently cast in my fourth production here. I was shocked and angered when the announcement was made to dissolve our department. Part of my decision to come to this school and give the university over $100,000 in tuition money during my four years here was made on the knowledge that UST had a theater department that students did not have to be theater majors in order to be cast in. I turned down scholarships at other less expensive schools in part because I wanted the freedom of choice to keep my convocation separate from my vocation. I wanted to be active in something I have loved since childhood, but I did not want to devote my future finances and family to something I do as a personal hobby. I wanted to study a field such as business or communications while still being able to perform in a way that betters my life on the inside. Since this decision has been made, it almost makes me ashamed to be a part of a school that pays lip service to the theater department in the press and dissolves its theater department behind closed doors for purely financial reasons. Don't get me wrong, there are enough positives about this university that I won't be transferring. I still love most things about this school. However, had I followed UST's example and acted on purely financial reasons when choosing my college I would not have come here in the first place. St. Thomas needs to reexamine its administrative processes if it wants to save face in the arts community.

Identity of the Insitution

I think one of the responsibilities of a school is to make various options available to students, even if at a particular period in time, students are not utilising them. It is not necessarily a place where a majority population's wants are met. Instead, it should be a place where students are confronted with new ideas and thoughts that they should be exposed to, in other words, exposure that they need. I am extremely disappointed especially because it looks to me as thought the "free market" has infiltrated into schools to the extent that the majority of the students population can decide which departments should or should not exist. Where does the identity of St. Thomas as an institution lie? In how it alters itself according to the students' demands and its financial situations, or how it internalizes the demands of the students, while maintaining its integrity and standing up for what it believes in as an institution. Also, where does the idea of diversity within student population fit into this decision? The more departments that are dissolved, the fewer students who are interested in the non-mainstream fields will apply to St. Thomas. Perhaps it is the duty of the school to raise funds for its Theatre Department as opposed to simply dissolve it.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <img> <span> <div>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

workaround
view counter