Monday, May 21, 2012
workaround

Donate Now tile

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.




workaround



Triangle Park Creative

Like Goldilocks, survey says police handled RNC ‘just about right’

September 16, 2008
Hey, someone’s been eating my constitutional rights!

After St. Paul announced last week that a man named Heffelfinger would review law enforcement during the Republican National Convention, a local TV station trumpeted what would seem to be Goldilocks’ view on the matter.


This weekend’s SurveyUSA/KSTP-TV poll reported that – in Three-Bears fashion – 60 percent of Minnesotans surveyed chose “Just About Right” as the best answer to this question: “How do you think law enforcement handled the arrests of hundreds of protesters during the Republican National Convention?”

“Just About Right?” Does that mean 60 percent of Minnesotans think that 45 is just about the right number of journalists to be arrested and detained? So 53 would have been too aggressive, 36 not quite aggressive enough? And 27 medics in cuffs is perfect — why, because it’s 3 X 3 X 3?

The other stances offered were “Too Aggressively” and “Not Aggressively Enough” — adherents of which might find they have more common ground with each other than with the blithe Just About Righties.

Never mind that SurveyUSA took the poll just as 9/11 memorials honoring fallen first responders filled the airwaves. Or that KSTP had already told viewers, in an unusual on-air editorial, that police had done a good job protecting the convention of the party the station’s owner gives prodigiously to. Or that, remarkably, the corollary question — Were Americans’ free speech rights protected too aggressively, not aggressively enough, or just about right? – is rarely posed by pollsters.

The question is: Who could look at what happened on the streets of St. Paul and Minneapolis — from the first house preemptively raided to the last faceful of pepperspray — and say law enforcement got it “just about right?” Did Survey USA only poll the mayors of St. Paul and Minneapolis?

“Just About Right” appears with some regularity in public opinion research. SurveyUSA has used it for polls in other states, including in a recent Washington State poll that asked about the level of media scrutiny applied to Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin. And it was used as recently as 2005 in an annual Sunshine Week survey regarding the amount of public access to government data and meetings.

It’s an attractive answer for people taking surveys: in a Washington Post/ABC poll from March, “Just About Right” walloped all comers on the question of whether McCain and Obama were too liberal, too conservative, or just about right. Gallup uses “Just About Right” when asking the same question (and found in July that slightly more people thought McCain too conservative than just about right).

In fact, “Just About Right” was one of the provided responses in the first nationwide public opinion poll, conducted by the Gallup organization in September, 1935: “Do you think expenditures by the government for relief and recovery are too little, too great, or just about right?”

“Just about Right” is a standard middle-response category in the field of consumer research where it goes by the acronym JAR, as in “JAR-scale surveys.” Even there, researchers — call them JARheads — rely on JAR-scales much more as a way to measure sensory responses, such as the taste of a new food than as a method to suss out judgements about concepts such as food product names or marketing campaigns.

And maybe that’s the problem with the SurveyUSA question on RNC policing: it measures whether the level of police aggressiveness was to your taste, not whether it was wrong in concept or practice. Or maybe future polls of this sort need a fourth option: Just About Wrong.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

My protester friends, you

My protester friends, you came to my town to cause violence and mayhem. You bragged for months about the trouble you would cause. You posted recruitment posters and materials on the internet featuring AK47s and Molotov cocktails. You posted manuals on making shields and weapons, tactics, and disabling devices. You blocked streets, broke windows, damaged buses, flattened the tires of innocent motorists, destroyed and damaged police vehicles, and assaulted elderly visitors to our City. You have made a mockery of free speech, interfering with the rights of others in your mayhem. Now you whine because the Saint Paul Police stopped you from doing your damage and you are being held accountable in a Court of Law. Many Saint Paul residents would like to be on the jury that convicts you. You give credence to neocon propaganda. You make me ashamed to be a liberal.

Clearly Clueless...

Either you work for the Mayor's office or you unthinkingly believe what you are told. Clearly you were not on the street and have no first hand knowledge of who the protesters were or of the abusive force by police officers. I was and it was not pretty. You now live in a police state. You'll see it a bit differently when they ransack your house and haul you away. Denial ain't just a river in Egypt.

Reply to "My Protester Friends"

Please DO NOT call yourself a liberal spouting all that garbage about the protesters being a "mockery of free speech"!! The atrocities of the strong arm of the police are what's a mockery! There was absolutely no reason they needed to react in the abusive manner shown over and over again. You obviously are one of those wealthy individuals that sit back in their comfortable living rooms and do nothing except complain. These protesters are trying to get people to notice what the conservatives are doing to this Country. In the past 8 years it's gone from bad to how are we going to get out of this one. And right now it looks like we're not!! I for one applaud all those protesters that have the courage to travel across country to come stand up for their RIGHT to voice their opinion. This Country was started because of atrocities our forefathers were subjected to in England. Protesting is one way to deliver a serious message. The fact that it may include violence is the nature of the business. Why don't you do something to make this Country a better place for EVERYONE not just those that have money. And please DON'T CALL YOURSELF A LIBERAL. I'm embarrassed to think there are liberals like you out there!!!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <img> <span> <div>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use [google_ad:ad_slot] to display Google Admanager ads within your content.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
workaround

Free Speech Zone

The Free Speech Zone offers a space for contributions from readers, without editing by the TC Daily Planet. This is an open forum for articles that otherwise might not find a place for publication, including news articles, opinion columns, and announcements. The opinions expressed in the Free Speech Zone and Neighborhood Notes, as well as the opinions of bloggers, are their own and not necessarily the opinion of the TC Daily Planet.

Click here to see a display of Twin Cities problem reports, from potholes to neighborhood eyesores. Click here to report a problem. Have you used SeeClickFix? Have you gotten any response from city officials? Let us know - email info@tcdailyplanet.net