Unripe library merger bears bitter bookmobile fruit

Eight months into a merger that was sold as a bailout of Minneapolis’ library system, a budget hole threatens to swallow Hennepin County’s bookmobile and other library services. That’s got newspaper editorialists wringing hands that are still smarting from merger backslaps, and library leaders ready to wring cash from naming rights—something St. Paul’s already doing this week at Midway Stadium.
As the Minnesota Independent reported a month ago, the Hennepin County Library is constructing a raft of wholesale service cuts meant to balance a budget that got swamped in the wake of the merger with the Minneapolis Public Library. Now the Star Tribune—a merger cheerleader—is highlighting the county’s imperiled Readmobile service in its news and editorial pages. It’s a story that was just as worthy of sobs two years ago when Minneapolis quietly put its own bookmobile on blocks.
But as the Strib’s own online reader-commenters are quick to point out, today’s editorial bemoans what the bookmobile’s loss would mean to the “littlest library patrons,” and scolds library staff for the current situation: “One-time merger-related costs are running higher than expected—and for that, administrators must shoulder responsibility.”
This from an editorial page that so fervently urged a hurried merger, it couldn’t hardly wait for “expected library board, city, county and legislative approval in a rapid-fire series of votes.” It also could find room for words of caution from two Minneapolis elected officials, whose op-ed on the subject, rejected last year by the Strib, ran instead in The Bridge neighborhood newspaper.
“If this is a good idea now, it will still be a good idea six months or a year from now,” wrote (delete stray characters) Minneapolis City Council Member Cam Gordon and Minneapolis Library Board Trustee Laura Waterman Wittstock, referring to a voter referendum on the merger mandated by state law but skirted by special legislative action. “If it is a bad idea, then we need time to consider the issues involved and make this bad idea better.”
Allowing citizens—and not only VIPs on blue-ribbon commissions—to review the libraries’ ledgers and vote on the merger might have put the mobile library service in a better place today. The Strib doesn’t do the math but supplies the latest numbers: two Readmobiles making 1,080 stops per year serve about 1.5 patrons per stop (in 2007) at a cost of $136 per patron (in 2009).
One of those VIPs told the Strib that getting cash from naming rights “would be a pretty easy sell.” By apparent coincidence, that remark appeared on a news page just above a display ad for St. Paul Saints games at “Skinny Water Park”—otherwise known as Midway Stadium but rechristened for this week only as part of a deal with a bottled-water company. St. Paul, which owns the ballpark, signed off on the deal, the Strib said, although in an email to MnIndy, St. Paul Director of Parks and Recreation Bob Bierscheid told MnIndy it’s only “a promotional marketing activity. No real name change has taken place.”
workaround























Comments
Library concerns
I think it’s important that we look at the facts before giving up on the merger. The fact is, three libraries that the city closed have now been open for more than half a year serving patrons with more computers than they previously had. The re-openings have been a huge success.
The fact is, 13 libraries, four in Minneapolis and nine in the suburbs with most of the money spent in Minneapolis, are now open on Sunday afternoons. Usage is high. Another success.
The fact is, the County Board commited $30 million to improvements to two community libraries in Mineapolis, as much as the entire commitment of referendum dollars by the city to community libraries.
The fact is, the proposed cuts in library services are just that, cuts proposed by the staff. No decision will be made until the final budget is adopted in December. The proposed cuts are a product overall county budget constraints that are largely the result of federal cuts. We know that the Minneapolis Public Libraries were confronting additional imminent library closings in 2009.
I reject the notion that waiting to combine the two systems was the preferable option. That choice would have simply prolonged the closing of the three libraries the city had previously closed, continued the reality of disinvestment in the Minneapolis Libraries and postponed the day of moving forward to create a viable, 21st century library system for the entire county. The choice was to move quickly to stop the bleeding or let it continue as some pursued an elusive solution to the problem, one that I concluded was not to be found no matter how much people talked about and looked for it. We needed to act to sustain an essential public service. We did and we will continue to do so as we address the usual bumps and curves associated with local government budgeting.
Peter McLaughlin
Hennepin County Commissioner
Post new comment