Local baristas join nationwide drive to organize Starbucks workers
As the world’s largest coffee company announced plans to close 27 stores statewide, several baristas in the Twin Cities announced plans of their own to fight back. Those plans begin with forming a union.
“We are not the first Starbucks workers to take this step, and we will not be the last,” said Erik Forman, a former barista at the first-floor Mall of America Starbucks and member of the Starbucks Workers Union (SWU). “Even at Starbucks workers can come together and make the kind of changes we need to see in this country.”
Forman joined four other Mall of America Starbucks workers in a press conference outside the mall July 22. The baristas shared with reporters their reasons for joining the SWU and the steps they have taken to change working conditions for themselves and their co-workers nationwide.
A day earlier, the baristas said, they briefly walked off the café floor to deliver a letter to their manager. In it, they demanded a fair severance package for workers at closing stores, a living wage, automatic cost-of-living pay increases, guaranteed hours, an end to understaffing and tuition reimbursement.
So far workers’ efforts to unionize have been met with stern resistance from the company. That resistance has surprised some employees and consumers, who listened to Starbucks tout itself as a socially responsible company.
But Starbucks’ response to their organizing efforts didn’t surprise the baristas outside the Mall of America.
Forman, fired in early July, believes he was targeted for promoting the fledging union to his co-workers. At the press conference, he called out the company for waging a “vicious anti-union campaign.”
“I’m a hard worker,” Forman said. “I’d been a half hour late to one shift after being on time for a year. Then I was fired because I talked about my final warning with another worker.”
Forman’s union filed charges against Starbucks with the National Labor Relations Board, and he expects to be reinstated within the coming months. More than 50 baristas at Starbucks stores throughout the Twin Cities have signed a petition calling on the company to reinstate Forman.
“For every person I talked to about my firing, I heard another story about someone they work with,” Forman said. “It’s inspiring to see co-workers break the silence about their treatment at Starbucks.”
Ted Dewberry, meanwhile, gave reporters a firsthand account of how he lost his employer-provided health insurance after failing to maintain a 20-hour-per-week average over the course of the last financial quarter. After Dewberry took his family on a week-long vacation, he came up short of that threshold.
Sarah Bright and Jake Bell, Dewberry’s co-workers, added that the high cost of enrolling in the company’s benefit plan puts coverage out of reach for most part-time baristas, who start off earning just $7.60 per hour. And the seasonal nature of retail work – particularly in the Mall of America – means hours oftentimes grow scarce.
Michael Moore edits The Union Advocate, the official publication of the St. Paul Regional Labor Federation. Visit the federation’s website, www.stpaulunions.org


Subscribe






Comments
seriously?
“high cost of enrolling in the company’s benefit plan”....hmmm, you mean to tell me that Sbux offers benefits to part-time employees?
How unfair is that?
I bet these minimum wage baristas are expected to shell out $75 a month for full medical/dental/vision coverage….oh my gosh! That is so extremely ludicrous!
Can you imagine if other fast food restaurants started offering benefits?
MADNESS!
re: anonymous Actually,
re: anonymous
Actually, it can be less than that. I work for the company, and spend less than $50 a month on my entire benefits plan. Granted, that number goes way up if you’re covering a spouse or dependents, but yeah. Pretty progressive for a part-time hourly job.
I’ve never agreed with those who want to unionize; our working conditions are simply not that bad. We already offer tuition reimbursement, among many other perks (how many McDonald’s workers do you know that get stock options and paid vacation?), and staffing/hours issues are a store problem, not a company problem. I don’t want unions to siphon money from my paycheck to get me things I already have.
you're missing the point
The point is that should these be jobs pay wages and benefits that people can raise a family on or are they always going to pay poverty wages if you’re anything but a 16-18 year old still living with your parents?
Since we’ve decided to ship all our manufacturing jobs overseas, these service sector jobs are the types of jobs that have stepped in to fill the employment void. But as you can see, because they’re not unionized, they don’t pay squat. Listen to you guys, you’re talking about being grateful that you get paid like $8/hour because it’s better than McDonald’s? How about you compare it to what you would actually need to live if this were going pay all your bills, allow you to save for retirement, buy a home, and perhaps even live a decent life and have some leisure time. That’s what a union will do for you as it’s done for 10s of millions in this country before you. It and the New Deal made the middle class in this country. And until people wake up and realize that they have to band together to demand the compensation they deserve for the labor they’re selling to their employer, then the middle class is going to continue to decline in this country and all of us are just going to sink deeper into debt as we replace real wages for credit card ‘wages’.
Post new comment