Monday, Jul 6, 2009

workaround

workaround

SMTWTFS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Sober house vote in St. Paul

June 30, 2008

After months of discussion, the St. Paul city council is set to vote on an ordinance regulating sober houses on Wednesday.

City councilmember Russ Stark explained in a telephone interview that, at present, “There’s no registration per se. There’s 34 or 35 sober houses that have been identified, meaning they have self-identified with the building inspectors. There’s likely to be more than that out there.”

Under St. Paul zoning laws, any housing unit can have up to four unrelated adults. The Federal Fair Housing Act protects people with disabilities, requiring that the city make reasonable accommodations for them.



St. Paul Planning Department proposal for city definition of sober houses:

A dwelling unit occupied by more than four (4) persons in recovery from chemical dependency and considered handicapped under the Federal Fair Housing Act Amendments of 1988 that provides a non-institutional residential environment in which the residents willingly subject themselves to rules and conditions intended to encourage and sustain their recovery. The residents of a sober house are similar to a famly unit, share kitchen and bathroom facilities and other common areas of the unit. Sober houses are financially self-supporting; i.e. this definition does not include facilities that receive operating revenue from governmental sources. Sober houses do not provide on-site supportive services to residents, as defined in section 321.01 of the Legislative Code other than basic informational referrals.

“With the new proposal,” Stark said, “there would be a form that a new sober house would be asked to fill out — a request for reasonable accommodation form. It would ask how many residents would be living in the unit and basic contact information for the operator. It would also include information about parking. It’s a request for reasonable accommodation to bypass the 4-adult limit.”

The originally-proposed ordinance would have required 330 feet between sober houses with five or six residents and 660 feet separation for sober houses with seven to ten residents. In effect, that would allow two of the smaller sober houses in a single block, but only one larger sober house. The restriction applies to RL-R4 residential districts.

A substitute ordinance offered June 25 provides for 330 feet of separation between sober houses and limits the size of sober houses to 10 residents “per unit.” The substitute ordinance refers to “property containing one or more sober house units.”

Both ordinances contain detailed provisions for adequate parking spaces.

A debate over regulation of sober houses heated up in the spring, when new sober houses were proposed for the Merriam Park area, which is already home to several sober houses.

The Union Park District Council (which includes the neighborhoods of Merriam Park, Lexington-Hamline, Snelling-Hamline and Desnoyer Park) has been at the forefront of ongoing discussions on regulation of sober houses. Union Park District Council wants tighter regulations than the city ordinance would provide, including a larger separation between sober houses, legal definitions of who qualifies as a sober house resident, and a city-wide list of sober houses.

Additional information on sober houses is available from the Minnesota Association of Sober Houses.

According to the Union Park District Council, city council discussion of the sober house ordinance will begin after 5:30 p.m. The meeting convenes at city hall at 3:30 p.m.

Care to comment? Click on the comment button below to leave a comment here. Or contact your city council member or leave a comment on the Union Park District Council Web site.

Article Tags:

Comments

Post new comment

The Twin Cities Daily Planet encourages readers to submit comments voicing their views in a constructive and civil fashion. The editors reserve the right to edit comments for length and clarity, and we may decline to publish comments that advertise services or goods, take an intemperate tone, or that contain potentially libelous allegations.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

workaround

Stories We're Working On

In progress

These are some of the stories we are working on. We invite and encourage you to contribute to these stories, or to suggest other stories that you would like to see covered.

REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK | North Minneapolis We’ll tell you what the judge decides on the flurry of lawsuits around last winter’s Jordan Area Community Council controversy as soon as the decision is made (probably the week of July 6). What do you think about what’s been going on at JACC, in Jordan, and around the Northside? Tell us what you know – and what you think we should be covering.

REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK | Background checks bar park volunteers
Minneapolis parks have recently tightened enforcement of rules about background checks for volunteers. But does the “systemic bias of the criminal justice system” mean that many African American males will be barred from serving as volunteers? We want to hear your ideas.

REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK | Hmong Freedom Celebration and Sports Tournament Coming up this weekend! We’re looking for community input about the sports tournament, your experiences at the tournament, how it has changed over the years, what the gathering of Hmong from around the country and around the world means, and any other thoughts you might have about the weekend.

MORE »

MUSIC | Black Blondie and Foxy Tann knock 'em dead at the Uptown Pride Block Party

The Uptown Pride Block Party on June 26 was an LGBT Pride Week affair, but you didn’t need to be lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender to get with it. For that matter, you didn’t have to have a dime in your pocket. All you had to bring was the willingness to enjoy a damned good time. MORE »

We get comments

Recent comments

MOVIES | Johnny Depp and Christian Bale in Public Enemies: Michael Mann doing what he does best: Austin Kennedy – I don’t mind independent pictures using HD video ‘cause they don’t have enough money for film, but when a major studio is making a multi-million dollar picture (and a period piece at that), shoot the friggin’ thing on film. No excuse! MORE »