Saturday, Feb 11, 2012
workaround

Donate Now tile

User login

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.




workaround



Triangle Park Creative

Two philosophers throw journalism a lifeline

June 17, 2008
I spent a little time recently trying to dream up a name for this new weekly column. I tried to distill in my mind the most essential and useful work that journalism offers society in a single phrase, and I ended up with talking with strangers.

From the first day that I worked as journalist 29 years ago, the toughest and most rewarding part of the job has always been this single bit – walking up to perfect strangers and having the chutzpah, the fabulous bad manners, to start asking questions.

So I Googled “talking with strangers” and I read a couple of books, and lo and behold, I discovered that the ancient Greeks considered talking with strangers – they called it “xenia” or “love of strangers” – an essential civic practice.  They saw this form of hospitality not merely as a polite thing to do, but as an absolutely required Athenian duty.

 
Debating Chops

For the Greeks, talking with
strangers was a way to glean troves of new and useful ideas to put to use
themselves. Socrates used it to hone his debating chops. But most of all,
xenia was a national security policy for ancient Greece because it helped
catch wind of plots against Athens that always were brewing nearby on the
peninsula.   


This got me wondering. America’s
foreign policy and predominant mood today isn’t xenia but its opposite,
xenophobia, an unreasonable yet still gut-grabbing fear of strangers.  


If we flipped that around and made
xenia instead of xenophobia our national obsession, would we be doing
better? Would we be happier, more popular in the world, and safer? 


Could xenia become the ethical
basis of a more generous, inspiring, imaginative and realistic citizenship
and journalism? 



Averting Eyes


Which brought me to my main Google
treasure – a

dazzling debate
on just these questions between two political
philosophers, Danielle Allen and Dana Villa, on Chicago Public Radio a
while back. Their recorded conversation is the richest and most suggestive
discussion of this topic I’ve ever encountered. 


Allen, who joined the School of Social Science at the Institute
for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J. about a year ago, argued
strongly that xenia is the paramount civic practice. She recalled
the classic schoolyard admonition -- “Don’t ever talk to strangers!” --
and she called for new, xenia-based American social values to counteract
xenophobia’s corrosive effects.  


“The averting of eyes is a habit
of citizenship,” Allen said. “We need a different habit. We need to prove
ourselves to other citizens to try to build trust. We must talk to
strangers in order to learn more about what’s out there in our polity, and
what our world is like, so that when it comes time to make choices about
national policies, we have a good database to draw on.”  



"Too Much Trust"


Villa, a professor at Notre Dame
and a specialist in Socrates, argued with equal persuasiveness that xenia,
while useful and important, is the lesser of two civic virtues, the prime
one being the will to fight dangerous national policies with the truth.  


“I don’t think that distrust is
the problem,” Villa said. “I think there is too much trust, too much trust
in government, too much deference to authority. At the national level, the
talking with strangers model breaks down and we have to focus on fighting
against the way that prejudices and popular opinion congeals to give a
seeming mandate to fairly radical and extremely dangerous national
policies.”  


Journalism is in chaos these days
with many newspapers and other news media closing, downsizing and changing
their business models, often by increasing celebrity and lifestyle stories
and decreasing news.  



A Lifeline


Many journalists and citizens are
seeking a return to basic guiding principles, and I think Villa and Allen
throw journalism a lifeline.   


They offer an interlocking pair of
axioms of enormously inspiring common sense, ethical depth, descriptive
power and potentially practical use to journalism and society.  


Dana Villa’s axiom is already
familiar and, in an ultimate sense, probably the more important of the
two: society needs citizens to speak truth to power. It’s more
important because if power doesn’t hear and act on the truth, ultimately
we all may die.  



Local to Global


But Allen’s axiom – society
needs to value and teach the practice of talking with strangers
-- is
the actual stepwise method to reach that end. It’s the local practice that
starts in the breast of a single individual person, then builds outwards
to embrace  neighbors and small communities and finally the state, the
nation, and the world.  


Talking with strangers and
speaking truth to power are continuous and interlocking, linked as means
and end. We’re all quite familiar and comfortable with the second part of
the equation, but we haven’t considered the first part for a couple of
thousand years.  


It’s time to dust off xenia and
give it a spin.  


Copyright @ 2008 The
McGill Report

Permalink http://www.mcgillreport.org/twophilosophers.htm





dougmcgill's picture
Douglas McGill

Douglas McGill has reported for the New York Times and Bloomberg News--and now the Daily Planet. To reach Doug McGill: doug@mcgillreport.org. And visit The McGill Report at www.mcgillreport.org.

Article Tags:

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Doug — thanks for

Doug -- thanks for this! It's terribly difficult to approach a stranger, especially with a video camera, but you've shed new light on the importance of that activity. -chuck

CORRECTION: Danielle Allen's affiliation

In your column on Danielle Allen and Dana Villa, you incorrectly refer to Danielle Allen's affiliation. She is actually the UPS Foundation Professor in the School of Social Science at the Institute for Advanced Study (not Studies). While located in Princeton, NJ, the Institute is not now, nor has it ever been, affiliated with Princeton University. A private, independent academic institution founded in 1930, the Institute for Advanced Study is one of the world’s leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. We would appreciate it if you would make a correction, as we work hard to try to change the misperception that we are part of the University, and errors such as this make our jobs more difficult.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <img> <span> <div>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use [google_ad:ad_slot] to display Google Admanager ads within your content.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
workaround

Free Speech Zone

The Free Speech Zone offers a space for contributions from readers, without editing by the TC Daily Planet. This is an open forum for articles that otherwise might not find a place for publication, including news articles, opinion columns, and announcements. The opinions expressed in the Free Speech Zone and Neighborhood Notes, as well as the opinions of bloggers, are their own and not necessarily the opinion of the TC Daily Planet.

Click here to see a display of Twin Cities problem reports, from potholes to neighborhood eyesores. Click here to report a problem. Have you used SeeClickFix? Have you gotten any response from city officials? Let us know - email info@tcdailyplanet.net