Minneapolis wi-fi network nearing completion
The network, which will cover 95 percent of outdoor space in the city, is being assembled in six phases. The first four and a half phases have been completed, said James Farstad, program manager for the city’s wireless network. These phases include the downtown, midtown, southwest, and north neighborhoods.
Phase five, which covers Northeast, and phase six, which includes the Nokomis area on the southeastern tip of the city, have yet to be completed.
“We need a phased approach so we have some control over ... how some segments of the network are working,” Farstad said. Building the network zone by zone allows USI to experiment and determine the best way to hang the equipment.
Joe Caldwell, CEO of USI Wireless, said that as of the first week of February, 11.4 square miles of the city were still waiting to receive the hardware needed to broadcast the signal. Despite complications, he said Minneapolis should be wireless in time to meet the March deadline.
Neighborhoods like Loring Park and Kenwood still lack signals because they're in what USI calls "challenge areas." In these areas, USI has had trouble finding ways to mount the necessary equipment.
USI uses electrical poles to hang the signal broadcasters. According to an Xcel Energy spokesperson, some poles don't have room to hold any more equipment. They have denied USI access to a total of 40 in Minneapolis but are considering a request from USI to reconsider. Also, a number of poles in structurally dense areas like Loring Park are too low to the ground to broadcast the signal well.
“(Loring Park) is probably going to be one of the last areas to get done because of it,” Caldwell said.
Around 8,000 people have signed up for the service, Farstad said. People can subscribe to one of three possible speeds. The one megabit-per-second bandwidth costs $19.95 per month, the three megabit costs $29.95, and the six megabit costs $35.9. Farstad expects 10,000 people will have registered for the service by the end of February.
Peter Fleck, webmaster for the University of Minnesota Extension's Family Development group, tracks the wireless network on his technology blog PF Hyper.com. Fleck said the city and USI Wireless could do a better job of keeping residents informed about the progress they’re making.
“They’ve hurt themselves by not communicating with city residents,” Fleck said. “We don’t know if they’re meeting their projections, we have to take their word on that.”
In the past, Fleck has recommended a list ways that USI and the city could market the wireless network and avoid confusion. He was unsure about the effect his advice had.
“If you have a private company operating a major network for the city, it’s important to know if they’re successful,” Fleck said. “Their success is critical for the city.”


We're people-powered journalism!
• North Minneapolis debates 


Comments
Early Reviews?
What I think
USI Wireless
USI Wirelss suck when it's snow -- Give an F minus
I just sign up with USI wireless for about a month. I bought their moderm for $79. When its first snow this year (Nov 2010), that moderm didn't have good signal at all.
Which service will be the best? I had netzero DSL, but the bad thing was when you move (within contract year) you have to pay the early termination FEE $150. This is true even you just move next door.
need modem too?
No
Network not actually as completed as advertised
USI signal sucks!!
Almost.......well Everyday around the times of 930am-1200pm and 100pm-400pm, the usi signal doesnt work. I am a block away from a node so therefore the signal/service should be better, but yeh its not! SOOOO irritating!!!
USI Sucks
Prepaid for a year and bought the wireless antenna only to find out USI thinks they are the internet police. You can forget about file sharing, USI Wireless will slow your traffic to a crawl and send you copyright notices. You can forget about stable connections or advertised speeds as well, because you will get neither. (I live 100 feet away from their node.) Unless you like getting lag stomped, you can forget about gaming too; my 256 Kb DSL was better then this. I am trying to get a refund, but their customer service is almost nonexistent - buyers beware.
Why bother.
I've tried USI and I have the same complaints as everyone else. When first I tried the roaming option with my USB adapter the signal is sketchy and I live 5 houses in either direction of 2 nodes. I have my antenna on the roof with clear LOS to each node yet the connection is unstable at best. When I rented the modem and antenna they provide I hoped for a better connection. Alas, not much of a difference. If you don't mind dial-up speeds and stability then it's okay.
I enjoy this post, it's great
I enjoy this post, it's great as well as informative article. O like looking over your blog, thanks for posting. Permit me to bookmark this article for future reading. I will look forward to some progress in the future. Keep it up! <a href="http://www.adreview.com/">internet marketing review</a>
I'm just going to say this, as blunt and honest as possible.
USI is f@#king terrible. Awful service. Randomly stops working. When I first heard "100$ for a year long plan" I thought hey, that's not too expensive.
It's not worth that. You're better off just connecting to your local Dunn Bros. That connection may be just as slow, but hell, at least it stays connected and it's free.
USI wireless is the ABSOLUTE worst.....
Trust me. I have ordered USI in 4 differnet parts of minneapolis( every time I moved ). If you rely on Internet more than several times a week, avoid at all costs. I have literally had dozens of visits by "technicians" who off the record told me to try CenturyLink or Comcast if I wanted reliability. It is terrible. Not even the city uses it when they need reliable service. What is sad is the amount of money Minneapolis has spent to buoy this company.
Post new comment