Thursday, Sep 2, 2010

Donate Now tile

workaround

User login

workaround

Donor Tile revised

In-kind Contributors

Surdyk's vintage logo

Educators discuss troublesome aspects of NCLB

From left: Dr. Delores Henderson, President of MN-NAME Venoreen Browne-Boatswain, Dr. Michael Rodriguez, and Sharon Radd.
Photo by Colette Davidson

October 13, 2007
Sharon Radd claims that public education in the U.S. has manipulated marginalized populations and has become privatized, imperialized and consumer-driven. “Listen for all the market language in the NCLB [No Child Left Behind] legislation,” says Radd, “You hear words such as ‘competition,’ ‘efficiency’ and ‘personal responsibility.’ I think that’s what makes NCLB really problematic.”

Radd, a public educator for 18 years, a Bush Fellow and a current doctoral candidate at the University of St. Thomas, was part of a panel speaking to the educators, policy makers and activists who met at Hamline University’s Klas Center on October 11. Other panel members were Dr. Michael Rodriguez, Associate Professor of Educational Psychology at the University of Minnesota and Dr. Delores Henderson, an educator in the St. Paul public schools for 33 years and winner of the Minnesota National Distinguished Principal award in 1991.

They discussed ways to promote multiculturalism and individualism in an education system that is bound by the constraints of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), initiated by the Bush administration in 2001. The resulting conversation touched on unfair standardized testing, budget cuts and racism in Minnesota schools. The panel was the fourth installment of the MN National Association for Multicultural Education’s (MN-NAME) Insisting on Education Series entitled, “Subverting No Child Left Behind and the Standards Movement.”

The educators outlined several problems with NCLB. Under NCLB, schools are rewarded or punished each year based on their Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results, which break down students into racial and economic sub-categories. The panelists maintain that there are unrealistic expectations for special education and English Language Learner proficiency requirements, and that too many variations occur nationally regarding aptitude standards. Panelists also expressed concern that art, music and, in some cases, social studies classes have been removed from school curriculums in order to allow more teaching time devoted to reading and math, which are the main focuses of the NCLB tests.

Standardized tests have become a point of contention for those opposing NCLB. They have been criticized as an unfair way to judge a child’s overall intelligence or biased towards the white, middle-class student. Dr. Rodriguez says there is a serious problem in the measurement community in terms of diversity. “I’ve worked with 15 states developing testing,” says Rodriguez, “I have never seen an American Indian represented, there are always very few African-Americans and I’m usually the only Latino in the room.”

As principal at Ames Elementary in St. Paul, Dr. Henderson doesn’t think there is racism in the tests, adding that a “brain is a brain.” She has had great success using Gifted and Talented teaching techniques with her students, 91% of whom are on free or reduced lunch and 80% of whom are people of color. “Every child should be given the same opportunity to learn,” she says, “It’s about equity, leadership in the building and engaging our students to learn. I believe every child is gifted and talented.”

Panel members urged the audience to speak to local government officials about reorganizing the education system. “We have to keep talking to people,” says Radd, “We have to get organized and demand change…It’s really important that we make our voices heard.”

Colette Davidson's picture
Colette Davidson

Colette Davidson (colettedav@hotmail.com) is a freelance writer for the TC Daily Planet and a former assistant editor of the Uptown Neighborhood News, now living in France.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Not every child is "gifted"

Every child is a gift from God, but NOT every child is intellectually gifted. Would Dr. Henderson claim that a child with an IQ 2 standard deviations below the mean (<70) is just the same as every other child? Or would she acknowledge that child has special educational needs because his/her intellectual ability is significantly below the mainstream? If so, then why is it so hard for her to acknowledge that children with an IQ 2+ standard deviations *ABOVE* the mean also have special educational needs?

Nice article, good

Nice article, good information. It's time for parents and educators to stand together and tell our politicians how NCLB is failing our children.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <img> <span> <div>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

view counter
workaround
view counter

Meet your neighborhood correspondent

Daily Planet / DealStork Deals

Daily Planet / DealStork Deals

Assignment Desk

Free Speech Zone

The Free Speech Zone offers a space for contributions from readers, without editing by the TC Daily Planet. This is an open forum for articles that otherwise might not find a place for publication, including news articles, opinion columns, and announcements.

Have you used SeeClickFix? Have you gotten any response from city officials? Let us know - email info@tcdailyplanet.net

Click here to report a problem, or to see more detailed reports from your zip code, city or neighborhood. Minneapolis 311 and the St. Paul mayor's office in St. Paul monitor SeeClickFix.

Advertise in the Twin Cities Daily Planet
view counter